Redemption

By Johnie Edwards

A new movie was recently filmed in Bloomington, Indiana called, “Redemption.” The Bible often speaks of redemption. Thus, we take a look:

1. Christ Died to Redeem Us. Paul wrote Titus concerning Christ, “Who have himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (Tit. 2:14). Christ paid the demanded price that we might have remission of our sins. Paul told the Ephesian pastors that the Lord’s church was “purchased with his own blood” (Acts 20:28). Without the death of Christ, there would be no redemption!

2. My Redeemer Liveth. The Hebrew writer said of Christ, “he ever liveth” (Heb. 7:25). Job, of old, said, “For I know that my redeemer liveth” (Job 19:25). Our redeemer is not dead, but much alive. Didn’t Matthew report, “God is not the God of the dead, but of the living” (Matt. 22:32)?

3. Redemption Made Possible by the Blood of Christ. No blood, no redemption! It’s that simple. The Holy Spirit said, “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold . . . but with the precious blood of Christ, as a lamb without blemish, and without spot” (1 Pet. 1:18-19).

4. Redemption is in Christ. The Roman Christians were told, “Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 3:24). Paul likewise wrote the Ephesians, “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace” (Eph. 1:7). Do you know how one gets into Christ, where redemption is? Galatians 3:27 says we are “baptized into Christ” (Gal. 3:27). Have you been baptized into Christ to be redeemed?

5. Eternal Redemption Awaits The Faithful. The writer of Hebrews said, Christ “. . . by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us” (Heb. 9:12). What a promise to the faithful in Christ! Are you one of the faithful in Christ?

4121 Woodyard Rd., Bloomington, Indiana 47404

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 13  p12  July 6, 2000

Billy Ashworth Passes

By Steve Wolfgang

William Casey Ashworth, Sr., known to friends and Christians as “Billy,” passed from this life about 5:00 A.M. Tuesday, March 7. His loving wife of 57 years, Lois, and other family members were at his side when he crossed over. 

Billy is survived by Lois; a son, Bill; a daughter, Bette (Mrs. Steve Wolf- gang); five grandchildren; a sister and several brothers, and a host of other relatives. 
 
Funeral services were conducted on Thursday, March 9, at the Williamson Memorial Chapel in Franklin, Tennessee. A standing-room-only gathering, estimated by the funeral director to number about 400 persons, assembled to remember his life, and to honor his memory. Services were conducted by Steve Wolfgang, Donnie Rader, and Dorris Rader — Billy’s son-in-law, nephew, and  brother-in-law.

Born October 8, 1919 in Williamson County, Tennessee, Billy lived in or near Franklin all his life, except for military service during World War II. He was a 1938 graduate of Battle Ground Academy in Franklin, and later used his GI benefits to attend David Lipscomb College in the early 1950s. 

Enlisting in the US Army in 1941, Billy rose to the rank of artillery sergeant before accepting an officer’s commission in the Adjutant General Corps, carrying documents and messages under arms to and from the Pentagon. Transferring to the Army Air Corps in 1943, he completed pilot training, serving for the remainder of the war as a pilot of B-17s — the renowned “Flying Fortress.” During the Korean War, he was recalled to active duty, this time as a fighter pilot, flying P-47s. Ever patriotic, he flew the U.S. flag in front of his home and on his cars, and often fretted over the directions he feared his country was heading.  

But as patriotic as he was, his first loyalty was to Jesus Christ. Raised in a devout Methodist family, he often said he was brought up to hate liquor and liars, and love the Bible and the Lord Jesus Christ. It was that devotion, and his basic honesty, which caused him to study the Scriptures and ultimately to renounce all human creeds and churches, become simply a New Testament Christian, and preach the simple gospel of Christ,   eschewing all doctrines and commandments of men.

He was helped in that process by the other great love of his life, Lois Rader. The love story of Billy and Lois is remarkable even now — they had met and dated before the war, and their relationship continued even when Billy went into service. Even though Lois suffered from active tuberculosis in a day when people would cross the street to avoid contact with her, Billy’s love for her was unwavering, and they married on February 5, 1943. Fifty years later, in February 1993, a host of relatives and friends gathered in Franklin to celebrate with them a half-century of marriage. 

Lois’ uncompromising belief in the Lord would not permit her to renounce the Lord’s church to join a denomination, and it was her staunch refusal to compromise her faith that led Billy to study on his own. He was baptized by his brother-in-law, Dorris Rader, on March 3, 1950. But as Dorris observed at the funeral service, his basic honesty and search for the truth led to his conversion.

He often said he was baptized in the middle of a fight, as the churches in Middle Tennessee and elsewhere were in the early stages of the turmoil over the support of human institutions and aspects of the social gospel. Billy soon determined to preach, and when most of the Middle Tennessee churches were swept into an institutional mania, he and a few other stalwarts stood their ground. His preaching was clear, direct, and straight to the point. A common refrain of many in the throngs who visited in the funeral home was, “You never wondered where he stood on an issue.” Billy preached with zeal and conviction — there was fire in his message. 

Billy preached his first sermon at the West End church in Franklin in December 1952, and began preaching regularly during 1953 at Peytonsville, then at Jones Chapel (1953-55), Old Lasea (1955-58), Almaville (1959-60), Berea (1961-63), New Hope (1963-64), and Kingston Springs (1965-67).

From 1968 to 1973, Billy preached at the Hillview church in Nashville where he enjoyed an especially close relationship with many of the brethren, returning there for his last local work from 1987-1990. In 1973 he began preaching at Oak Avenue in Dickson, one of the largest of the Middle Tennessee churches which had resisted the rush to support human institutions. While preaching there, he also served as an elder for several years. In 1982, he and Lois moved to Lewisburg, working with the Hickory Heights church until December 1986. After finishing his second work at Hillview, he and Lois became active members of the Collegevue church in Columbia, Tennessee, where they had retired. Lois still resides in Columbia with their son, Bill. 

Much of Billy’s early preaching was done while employed in a full-time secular occupation. Even before World War II, he had begun a career with the U.S. Postal Service. Returning to the Post Office after his military service, he was appointed in 1957 as Postmaster in his home town, Franklin, by President Dwight D. Eisenhower — a point of particular satisfaction for Billy, who was keenly interested in politics (although prohibited by civil service regulations from participating or publicly endorsing a candidate). 

His secular employment allowed Billy to serve several small churches which could not otherwise afford to have regular preaching. He served as Postmaster at Franklin until 1975 when he retired from government service after more than 35 years (including his military service). His early “retirement” allowed Billy to devote “full-time” efforts to the preaching of the gospel. His meeting work, mostly in Tennessee and the surrounding states of Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, and Kentucky, also took him further afield to Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, Oklahoma, and Oregon.

One small anecdote illustrates his painstaking honesty. When Billy took over the Postmaster’s office vacated by his predecessor, the only thing in the office, other than government-issue furniture and official files, were three pennies in an ash tray on the desk. One day, years later, when Lois was in his office, she noticed that they were still there and asked why he didn’t get rid of them. “They’re not mine,” was the simple reply from the man who taught his children “If it’s not yours, keep your hands off it — treat it like a rattlesnake.” When he left the office on 31 July 1975, they were still there.   

But possibly Billy Ashworth’s most significant contribution was his radio preaching. Beginning in 1953, Billy preached for 18 years continuously on station WAGG in Franklin, sometimes paying for the air time out of his own pocket (though the time was often purchased by the local church with which he was working at the time). Through his radio preaching many listeners in Middle Tennessee heard teaching on the nature and work of the church, godly living, and the necessity to contend earnestly for the faith (as well as a host of other issues) which they might not otherwise have heard. He continued his radio preaching on stations in Dickson in the 1970s and Lewisburg in the 1980s, and thus, for nearly 40 years, Middle Tennessee heard the word of the gospel through the radio preaching of brother Billy Ashworth. 

Many friends and fellow Christians have responded upon hearing of his death. Any who wishes to contact Lois may do so at 2148 Nashville Highway, Columbia, TN 38401. Typical of the many tributes received by E-mail was that of James P. Needham, who said, “I always appreciated him for his love for truth and willingness to stand in the face of great odds. His work in Middle TN will be long remembered and will bear fruit long after he has gone the way of all the earth.”

But perhaps the most eloquent tribute was that of brother Don Alexander of Sacramento, California, who wrote: 

I was saddened, as were many other brethren, when I read of the passing of brother Billy Ashworth. I was a child in the 1950s, growing up in Middle Tennessee during a time of great preachers and great preaching, but also sadness and conflict over institutionalism. My family were members at Locust Street church of Christ in Mt.  Pleasant, Tennessee, and my father served as an elder during those days, James A. (“Lonnie”) Alexander. Many wonderful preachers came to Locust Street both as located preachers as well as those who held gospel meetings. I remember these princes of God’s people very well, for they made an impression on a young boy and young Christian trying to do what was right. When my father and other men like brother Robert Jackson, brother Rufus Clifford, brother Martin Lemon, and others made a stand against unauthorized innovations in the work of the church, men like brother Billy Ashworth were right there. My parents loved him and always spoke highly of him. 

Brother Ashworth I remember as a true Southern gentleman with a Christian demeanor. I also remember him, as I think back on him tonight, as the first preacher I had ever met who also had a job besides preaching, which made him a “part-time” preacher, I guess by today’s vernacular. He would often preach at Locust Street on an “appointment” basis, ate in our home, and enjoyed brotherly love. Through the years as I have tried to preach the gospel, usually while working a “secular” job in addition to preaching, I have thought of brother Ashworth, as well as Gilbert Tyler, another Middle Tennessee preacher who “worked” and preached. Though often not mentioned with the “full-time” preachers, these men did their work in an unassuming way for the good they could do without a lot of fanfare. I admired them then without fully understanding the reasons why, other than that they loved the Lord, his Word, and his people and quietly did their work. In fact, I believe men like them have influenced my life in ways I may not have fully known until I read of their passing.

Please stand and salute as another of God’s noblemen passes by and into eternity.” Don Alexander (DMAeagle @aol.com)

One of Billy’s favorite scriptures was Acts 27:25, where Paul said, “I believe God, that it shall turn out just as I have been told.” He lived in his life with firm belief in God, the surety of his promises, and his watchful care for his children, determined to tell others the old, old story.  Let us follow his example.

A sobering addendum: I have often noted, in preaching and teaching my series on the history of efforts to restore New Testament Christianity in this country, that there are certain dates which symbolically demarcate the changing patterns from generation to generation. For instance, an 18-month period during 1940-1941 witnessed the deaths of J.D. Tant, Daniel Sommer, Joe Warlick, and F.B. Srygley — all old stalwarts who had become household names for several generations for their attempts to stand for truth and right and preach the whole counsel of God in the face of opposition and apostasy. 

Within a decade of their passing, the churches were embroiled in a controversy, not unlike a similar controversy sixty years earlier in the 1890s, which swept many of them into a digressive boosterism totally unlike anything revealed in the New Testament. It is sobering to think, in a year gone by which has seen the passing of James R. Cope, Clinton Hamilton, H.E. Phillips, Billy Ashworth, and others, what the next two decades may hold as a younger generation rises up to replace those who, having fought the good fight, have finished their course. 

385 E. Lexington Ave., Danville, Kentucky 40422

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 13  p8  July 6, 2000

Baptism: In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, or in the Name of Jesus Christ?

By Ron Halbrook

From time to time, discussions have occurred over whether baptism is “in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” or is “in the name of Jesus Christ” (Matt. 28:19; Acts 2:38). It is both! 

“In the Name of”: Authority, Power, the Right to Command

“In the name of” does not prescribe a ritualistic formula of words to be called out while baptizing a person, but explains by what right or authority baptism is commanded. The Jewish leaders asked Jesus concerning the things he taught and practiced, which included baptism, “By what authority doest thou these things? And who gave thee this authority?” Jesus said their question about authority would be answered if they answered an equivalent question: “The baptism of John, whence was it? From heaven, or of men?” They refused to answer the question (Matt. 21:23-27). In this debate over the issue of authority, the Jewish leaders and Jesus were not discussing what ritualistic formulas were in order but whether the things taught and practiced were divinely authorized. We do not know what John or Jesus or the Apostles said during the act of baptizing anyone, but we know they all had divine authority for what they preached and practiced regarding baptism. 

This same word translated “authority” in Matthew 21 is translated “power” in Matthew 28:18. In giving the Great Commission, Jesus said, “All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.” That statement affirmed his deity, for only God can possess all power or authority. His divinity or Godhood had just been proven by his conquering death. Therefore, whatever he commands is the command of the Godhead — it is of God, not of mere man. 

There are three persons in the Godhead: the Father, the Word or the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The Godhead works in perfect harmony because each person fully shares the same divine nature. All three members of the Godhead were active in the creation of the universe (Gen. 1:1-2, 26; John 1:1-3). The miracles of Jesus were the deeds of deity, proving, “I and my Father are one . . . I am the Son of God . . . the Father is in me, and I in him.” The Jews properly understood that Jesus was claiming to be God in the flesh (John 10:22-38). 

The perfect unity and absolute authority of the three persons in the Godhead are to be affirmed in the preaching of the gospel. “Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matt. 28:19). The gospel, including the command of baptism, is to be preached and practiced in the name of God, deity, or the Godhead. “Name” is singular, representing the unity or oneness of the divine nature shared by three persons. It is exactly like our expression, “in the name of the law.” “Name” is singular, representing the united authority of the many arms and departments of civil government. The “name” of God — his being, nature, power, and authority — represents his right to command. Men are to be taught and baptized by the authority of the one true God: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. 

Baptism “In the Name of Jesus Christ”

On the day of Pentecost in Acts 2, Peter preached, “Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved,” or in other words, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost” (vv. 21, 38). If “name” here refers to a formula of words, it must be spoken by the one being baptized, not by the baptizer. The formula must be called out at least twice: once when the sinner repents and again when he is baptized. Also, the formula does not match in the two verses: “the name of the Lord” and “the name of Jesus Christ.” Furthermore, since we are to do “all things in the name of the Lord Jesus,” this ritual must be performed for everything we do for the rest of our lives — someone must walk beside us calling out the formula over our every deed seven days a week, 24 hours a day (Col. 3:17). 

Peter was not preaching a formula to be called out but was affirming that the message he preached is commanded by the Lord — that is, by Jesus Christ — that is, as Jesus himself put it, by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. When King David sent someone on a mission “in the name of David,” did someone else stand and call the name of David over the messenger when he did David’s bidding (1 Sam. 25:5, 9)? If not, then one may do a thing “in the name of” another without repeating a formula of words. Further, David opposed Goliath “in the name of the Lord” (1 Sam. 17:45). David was by himself, so who orally called the Lord’s name over him? No one did! David came against Goliath in the name of, by the authority of, the Lord, and he did so without anyone reciting a formula of words over him. Therefore, one may act “in the name of the Lord” ­— “in the name of Jesus Christ” — “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” — without having to repeat a formula of words.

There is perfect harmony in the Godhead as to what men must believe and obey in order to be saved. To obey the gospel is to seek and to receive salvation from the Lord, from Jesus Christ, or, to say it another way, from the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. 

Healing “In the Name of Jesus Christ”

In Acts 3 Peter healed a man “in the name of Jesus Christ” and explained that through his name all men may be saved from their sins (vv. 6, 19, 26). This does not mean someone called out a formula of words over Peter as he healed the man. As the Apostles continued to preach “through Jesus the resurrection from the dead,” the Jewish leaders demanded to know “by what power, or by what name” they preached and performed miracles. To clarify “by what means” these things were done, Peter said it was “by the name of Jesus Christ . . . , even by him . . . Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name given among men, whereby we must be saved.” After the Apostles were threatened and released, they reported these things to the brethren, who noted that Christ himself had been similarly abused: “The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ” (Acts 4:1-12, 26). The “name” is equivalent to the “power” or “means” by which something is done. These things were done by “the Lord” and “his Christ,” and when men resisted the Son they resisted the Father. 

Harmony in the Godhead

Because of the harmony in the Godhead, what may be attributed to one may be attributed to the other, even though each member may perform some distinct part of the work spoken of. For instance, since each acted in the creation, we may properly recognize each as our Creator. Since each acted in providing our salvation, we may ascribe our salvation to each. Since each was involved in the origin and provision of the gospel, including the command of baptism, it may be properly said that we preach and practice baptism “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” To accept or reject baptism is to accept or reject “the counsel of God” because he commanded it (Luke 7:30). Also, Christ commanded it: “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved” (Mark 16:16). Also, the Holy Spirit revealed and commanded it, so that we are “born of the water and of the Spirit” (John 3:5). Truly, since baptism is in the name of Jesus Christ, it is in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. 

Before, during or after baptizing someone, we may use the words of Matthew 28:19, Mark 16:16, John 3:5, Acts 2:21, Acts 2:38, Colossians 2:12, Titus 3:5, or any other passage appropriate to the occasion. Insisting on the language of any such passage to the exclusion of another is “doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth.” We are to teach “wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ,” and that includes the words of Matthew 28:19 (1 Tim. 6:3-5).

3505 Horse Run Ct., Shepherdsville, Kentucky 40165

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 13  p14  July 6, 2000

Total Commitment

By James Hahn

We frequently hear some speaking of having “total commitment” in their lives. I think most of them expect us to believe that this “total commitment” is to Jesus Christ. There are several different groups who place much emphasis upon their members having this “total commitment.” As you examine these groups you will find that they have different teachings and practices. About the only thing they have in common is their criticism and ridicule of those they say are “traditionalists.” We sometimes find such attitudes among those who identify themselves as members of the body of Christ.

These individuals who place so much emphasis upon this “total commitment” make claims of sincerity, devotion and love for themselves while, at the same time, maintain that the “traditionalists” (which happens to be anyone who questions their activities) are insincere, not devoted and lacking in love. 

One sure way of being classed as a “traditionalist” by these individuals is to stress the need to respect the authority of God’s word in everything you teach and practice. I have never been able to understand why one who ignores the authority of Christ and simply teaches and practices what he pleases and is filled with sincerity, love and devotion, and on the other hand why one who stresses that a person should teach and practice only those things authorized by him is insincere, not devoted and lacking in love. Can you figure it out?

Maybe what we need to do is go back and look at this matter of “total commitment.” When you speak of someone having “commitment” this really doesn’t tell you much unless you also reveal that to which he is committed. In my talks with those who claim this “total commitment” for themselves, I have found that they truly are committed. Let’s note some things to which they are committed.

Many of them are committed to doing that which pleases them. If it makes them “feel good” about themselves or brings pleasure to them they are committed to it. Oh, I know they talk about Jesus and would have you believe that he is the center of their lives, however, Jesus, himself, said, “And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” (Luke 6:46).

As we study through the pages of God’s word we realize that the  teaching of Jesus or the apostles did not make those who heard it feel good about themselves. It made them realize that they were guilty of sin and were separated from God in their present condition. The dishonest and insincere became angry and often resorted to violence against the one telling them the truth (see Acts 7:54-60). Those who were honest also felt badly upon learning of their condition, but they received and obeyed the truth and then rejoiced (see Acts 2:41; 8:39).

By what standard do these individuals determine that if one emphasizes strict obedience to and respect for the authority of Jesus he is insincere and not serving from the heart? How can they judge the hearts of others? It just may be that those who teach and practice only that which is authorized in the word of God are doing so because they are “totally committed” to pleasing and glorifying the Lord rather than themselves. In fact, this is the kind of “total commitment” we need to have. Don’t be deceived by those who say they are “totally committed” to Christ but show otherwise by their actions. The person who is committed to Christ will demonstrate that love by keeping his commandments (see John 14:15, 21; 1 John 5:3). To what are you committed?

1212 Melaine Ct., Lawrenceburg, Kentucky 40342-1724

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 15  p3  August 3, 2000