That Museum Mentality

By Connie W. Adams

Some of us have been accused of having a “museum mentality” about the church, we just want to “dust off the displays and make sure nothing disturbs the scene.” That put me to thinking. I remember a speech delivered by James P. Miller at the 1951 Florida Christian College lectures on “An Unchanging Kingdom in a Changing World.” While it was acknowledged that social customs and technology change (transportation, communication methods, medical procedures, etc.), it was also pointed out that the kingdom of God has features about it which cannot be changed without inviting the displeasure of God.

In the years since, I freely admit to having preached on that subject with the same emphasis. In 1974, when I edited and published Searching The Scriptures, we did a special issue of the paper using that title as a theme. It was well received and we had to do a second printing to satisfy all the orders for it. To the best of my knowledge, nobody accused us of having a “museum mentality.”

An Archaeological Dig

The editor who has issued this charge, Floyd Chappelear, says that some of us think “the Restoration work has been done” but that he is among those who believe “it is an archaeological dig which must go on continually.” Those connected with the Restoration Movement in this country and abroad, were not right about everything. But they were right about one thing: their plea was valid. It was a call to go back to the Bible and speak as the oracles of God. From the Bible alone can we learn what to do to be saved. It teaches that God’s grace provided a plan of action by which the sinner appropriates the grace, mercy, and love of God. The sinner must hear the word of God (Rom. 10:17), believe it (Mark 16:16), repent of his sins (Acts 17:30), confess his faith (Rom. 10:10) and be baptized for the remission of his sins (Acts 2:38). Has the spade of this editor dug up anything else? Or would he seek to preserve this truth, perhaps “dust off the display and make sure nothing disturbs the scene”?

From the New Testament we learn of the nature of the kingdom. It is spiritual (John. 18:36; 1 Pet. 2:5). Its organization is on a congregational level with elders in every church (Acts 14:23; Phil. 1:1; 1 Tim. 3:1-7; 1 Pet. 2:2-3). Its work is (1) evangelism (1 Thess. 1:8; Phil 4:15-16; 1 Tim. 3:15); (2) edification (Eph. 4:16); and (3) relief of needy saints (1 Cor. 16:1-2; 1 Tim. 5:16). Public worship consists of: (1) singing (Eph. 5:19); (2) praying (Acts 2:42); (3) teaching/preaching (Acts 2:42; 20:7); (4) breaking bread on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7); and (5) laying by in store on the first day of the week (1 Cor. 16:1-2). Has the editor dug up something different from this? Would he contend that these ought to be preserved? If so, does he have a “museum mentality”?

Grow in Grace and Knowledge

Of course, we must all continue to study, learn, and grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (2 Pet. 3:18). To accomplish that we must search the Scriptures (Acts 17:11). The word of God is an inexhaustible treasure which can never be depleted. In that sense we must continue to dig into its riches.

Bad Names

Those whose spirits lag, or feel stifled by the “same old things” have found some bad names to call those who think in terms of a divine pattern, or the need for scriptural authority. Some have called us “legalists,” “Pharisees,” “keepers of orthodoxy,” “watchdogs,” and other terms meant to belittle. If “museum mentality” is not a blood brother to these bad eggs, it is at least a first cousin.

I am as ready as the next fellow to adapt modern expedients to the scriptural work the Lord has given us to do in his kingdom, but I will give the last drop of blood I have to see that nothing disturbs the scene when it comes to what the Bible teaches we are to believe, teach, and practice. I will oppose and expose those who seek to change it, water it down or compromise it. If that makes me a museum keeper, then so be it. Jude just called it con-tending for the faith once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 3). The saints are custodians of that faith and they are under obligation to him who delivered it to see to it that “nothing disturbs the scene.”

Guardian of Truth XLI: 11 p. 3-4
June 5, 1997

Have I Become Your Enemy?

By Kyle Campbell

Paul wrote to the churches of Christ in Galatia to expose the erroneous doctrines introduced by the Judaizing teachers and to re-indoctrinate the brethren in their earlier faith. He said, “You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace” (Gal. 5:4, NASV). They were looking to Moses’ law for justification, being seduced to accept circumcision and other facets of the Old Testament, as requirements of the New Covenant.

In Galatians 1:6-7, Paul describes their perverted state: “I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you, and want to distort the gospel of Christ.” He was fearful that he had labored among them in vain (Gal. 4:11). Though his relationship in the past with these brethren had been cordial, yet their acceptance of false doctrine now greatly concerned him (Gal. 4:11-15, 17-20). In his concern and anxiety for them, he asked, “Have I therefore become your enemy by telling you the truth?” (Gal. 4:16).

We are apt to cut our ties with and dislike those who have the courage to tell us the truth about sin in our lives. We do not like for people to be acquainted with our faults. We desire to be flattered, but shrink away from exposure of sin and calls to repentance. We often become easily offended when preachers expose and reprove sin. One of our greatest difficulties is to regard, with steady and unwavering affection, the person who earnestly tells us the truth, yea painful truth! “Faithful are the wounds of a friend, but deceitful are the kisses of an enemy” (Prov. 27:6).

Children of God sometimes need to be rebuked! In fact, most of the New Testament was written to instruct, rebuke, and encourage Christians. There are several examples in the New Testament where men had to rebuke one another to save them from sin: Peter rebuked Simon who had recently obeyed the gospel (Acts 8:18-23); Paul rebuked Peter to his face (Gal. 2:11-12); John called Diotrephes by name and exposed the sin he committed (3 John 9); Paul told Timothy to rebuke elders and others, who continue in sin that the rest may fear (1 Tim. 5:17-21).

There are many examples in the Scriptures showing that preaching God’s word often creates enemies. Moses was truthful to Pharaoh but Pharaoh hated him, saying, “Get away from me! Beware, do not see my face again, for in the day you see my face you shall die!” (Exod. 10:28-29). And Moses responded, “You are right; I shall never see your face again!” (Exod. 10:29). The wicked Jezebel, due to the deaths of her prophets of Baal at Mount Carmel and in the matter of Naboth’s vineyard and death, hated Elijah with unbounded enmity (1 Kings 18:16-46; 19:1-18; 21:1-24). Herod and Herodias hated the truth so vehemently that they had John the Baptist beheaded for telling them the truth (Matt. 14:1-12). The enemies of Jesus feared the truth so much that they bribed the soldiers to lie (Matt. 28:11-15). King Ahab said of the prophet, Micaiah, “I hate him, because he does not prophesy good concerning me, but evil” (1 Kings 22:8).

Often people today hate gospel preachers for the same reason. The only difference between them and Ahab is they are not honest enough to admit the real cause of their opposition to God’s messenger. Very few people are honest enough to say, “I do not like that preacher because he tells me the truth.” Instead they hypocritically attribute their dislike to some pretended reason. Isaiah says that people of his day said, “You must not prophesy to us what is right; speak to us pleasant words, prophesy illusions” (30:10). This cry has been heard in every age. The greatest fault in the religious world is man’s efforts to change the Bible to conform to him-self rather than change himself to conform to the Bible.

People generally have fought the truth for two major reasons. The first is that some have been unconscious enemies of the truth, i.e., they fought God and his will ignorantly. Saul of Tarsus did so (Acts 26:9; 1 Tim. 1:13), but seeking truth, and being honest of heart as Saul was, finding the truth he renounced his error and embraced it (Matt. 7:7-8; 13:44-46; Acts 26:9-23; Gal. 1:13-24). Those who do not love the truth will remain blinded in their ignorance and error (2 Thess. 2:10-12). The second reason men fight the truth is that they love darkness, which to them covers their evil deeds. Jesus said, “And this is the judgment, that the light is come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light; for their deeds were evil” (John 3:19). Spiritual creatures of darkness despise light. Their deeds are evil and sinful; therefore, they do not want to hear the truth.

No matter how much the truth of God is opposed, it will survive. Paul’s question and the context of Galatians 4 con-firms the fact that truth must be preached at the expense of making enemies. The truth is the most valuable commodity in existence because it is the revelation from God which can save us from our sins. “Buy truth, and do not sell it; get wisdom and instruction and understanding” (Prov. 23:23). A compromising attitude toward error will always lead to apostasy. Paul details the steps toward apostasy in 2 Timothy 4:3-4: (1) They would not endure sound doctrine, which is the attitude of compromise. They accumulated for them-selves certain teachers who would proclaim their views (?) of truth. Paul called it “having their ears tickled.” (2) They turned their ears away from the truth, not only refusing to hear the truth but in time rejecting the whole counsel of God. (3) Finally they turned aside to myths. All truth was eliminated from their lives. This sad progression began with a disposition of mind and ended with a total rejection of God’s will. It is urgent that Christians realize the trends toward apostasy and meditate upon this frightening succession of ungodly attitudes. Now, in our generation, we are seeing dispositions developing which, if accepted and practiced, will weaken and eventually destroy us.

One expression of compromise is the statement, “Preach the Bible but let everybody else alone.” Every true student of the Scriptures knows this is impossible. You would have to shun preaching the creation of the world and of life (Gen. 1:1-31; Heb. 11:3) for fear of enraging the atheist and evolutionist; avoid preaching the Ten Commandments (Exod. 20:1-17) for fear of irritating the polytheistic pagan; forego preaching pleasing God through faith (Heb. 11:1-40) for fear of annoying those who live their lives by their con-science. If the general of an army were to say, “Shoot, but make sure you do not hit anybody,” it would bring certain defeat! Several years ago an elder of a church said, “The trouble here is our preacher is a professional ball player. He winds up on Sunday morning and throws a curve around everybody in the house.” A preacher has advanced spiritual astigmatism if he cannot hit some of us sinful creatures once in a while! One preacher would not preach on heaven nor hell because he said he had friends in both places! We desperately need men who will “break unto us the bread of life” and deliver “the whole counsel of God” (John 6:31-35; Acts 20:20, 27). Preaching the Bible, while making sure that we do not step on anybody’s toes, will do nothing for the saving of souls, development of the local congregation, and preparing saints for eternal life in heaven (Acts 20:32).

Another sentiment is, “Don’t preach a negative gospel.” How can we not preach a “negative” gospel? This thinking indicts God, himself, because he did not always deliver a “positive” message to his prophets and apostles. A careful study of Exodus 20, will show eight of the ten commandments stated in a “negative” fashion. Paul said, “I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom: preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction” (2 Tim. 4:1-2). Two of the three of those commands are “negative”! In naming the works of the flesh, Paul mentioned seventeen “negatives” (Gal. 5:19-21). In naming the fruit of the Spirit, he lists only nine “positives” (Gal. 5:22-23). We need to preach the “positive” truths of the gospel. We need encouraging lessons which comfort us in difficult times, which help us understand God’s love, and which aid us in becoming better servants of Jesus. We need to know we are doing God’s will correctly! But we also need preaching on adultery, fornication, gambling, smoking, hatred, envy, lasciviousness, drunkenness, church discipline, immodest apparel, respect for authority, and other vital subjects.

A final attitude of compromise is, “Let’s please the people instead of saving the people.” Paul’s statement to the Galatian brethren needs to be read and imprinted in our hearts: “For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ” (Gal. 1:10). Pleasing the people has caused a steady moral and spiritual decline in our nation and in the kingdom of God. Denominational churches allow homosexuals, adulterers, and heretics to fill pulpits and proclaim a “saving gospel” while their souls are condemned to hell! Anyone who can read the daily newspaper, or watch the television news, can see the religious world in a mad race to see which one can make religion the most palatable to the public. I am convinced that if we do not improve our preaching and teaching, to make such more Bible-centered and Scripture-filled, the Lord’s church, in an effort to please the politically-correct public, will become a sect among sects. Let us always stand for and preach the truth of Jesus Christ, else we will pay the disastrous consequences of lost souls at the judgment seat of Christ Jesus (2 Cor. 5:10; Rom. 2:16).

It is shameful to hear of and see preachers fired and meetings canceled for preaching truthful messages which are so needed in our time. It is even more shameful to see congregations and their elders unwilling to stand for and back up the truth. We ought to never consider as enemies whose who have our soul’s best interest at heart. If I am indulging in a course of conduct which will condemn my soul or cherishing erroneous doctrine which endangers my salvation, my greatest and best friend is the one who will warn me of my perilous, dangerous course.

Guardian of Truth XLI: 11 p. 6-8
June 5, 1997

In God Do We Trust

By Mike Willis

One of the statements on our currency is the phrase, “In God do we trust.” Unfortunately, more seem to be trusting in currency than in God. Solomon wrote,

He that trusteth in his riches shall fall: but the righteous shall flourish as a branch (Prov. 11:28).

This proverb contrasts the one trusting in riches and the righteous (the one trusting in God) with reference to the eventual outcome of their lives.

The One Trusting in Riches

The word trust is translated from Mn; (batach), which is accurately represented by the English word “trust.” Riches is translated from 1 P (`osher). The one who trusts in riches is one who thinks that his riches can preserve him from the consequences of his sin.

We have seen how riches are sometimes used to protect men from the consequences of their sinful action. A rich drug dealer can hire the best attorneys to buy “reasonable doubt.” Hush money can keep witnesses from testifying in political scandals. Corporations can buy legislation with the right contributions to the party in power.

Others trust in money by making it the supreme purpose for their lives. Their chief aim in life is the accumulation of wealth. They don’t care who they step on or hurt in order to attain their wealth, for they believe that wealth can provide them everything in life worth having.

The wise man said that such men will fall. Fall is translated from In; (napal). The word literally means “fall” but is used figuratively to mean “go to ruin, perish” (BDB 657). Many who trust in riches experience temporal judgments that destroy them. Others who trust in riches live out their lives without experiencing a “fall.” However, in the day of death and judgment, these souls will meet the same sad eternal fate as the rich man in Luke 16:19-31. That man went to torment because his love of riches kept him from helping poor Lazarus. His trust in his riches led him to the worst fall of all.

George Lawson wrote, “They that trust in riches shall fall like the flower of the grass, or like the leaves of a tree. Their riches shall leave them; or if they should die in the midst of their wealth, they can carry nothing of their glory along with them. Their wealth cannot keep them from falling into hell, or mitigate the horrors of the infernal lake; but the righteous shall flourish as a branch” (The Book of Proverbs 219).

Paul warned the rich not to trust (eATr’Io , “to hope.. . to build hope on one, as on a foundation,” Thayer 205) in their uncertain riches (1 Tim. 6:17). One should not hope in riches because, in contrast to God, they are uncertain.

The Righteous Shall Flourish

The righteous (from ^’7′., “just, righteous,” BDB 843) are the opposite of those who trust in riches; hence, it must be those who trust in God and obey his will. The righteous man is the one who does what God commands, even when his outward senses tell him that his earthly life will be better if he disobeys God. A man like Daniel could have reasoned that his life would be more pleasant if he would eat the king’s dainties (Dan. 1). Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego could have reasoned that life would be better if they would bow down to the king’s image. However, they concluded that their fate was better off to die in obedience to the Lord than to live in disobedience to him. They told Nebuchadnezzar, “0 Nebuchadnezzar, we are not careful to answer thee in this matter. If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, 0 king. But if not, be it known unto thee, 0 king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up” (Dan. 3:16-18). Men of such faith and trust in God are intended by the word “righteous.”

Such men shall “flourish as a branch.” The word flourish is from fl , “bud, sprout, shoot” (BDB 827). The word branch is translated from i 1 l%y, “leaf, leafage” (BDB 750).

The figure of the branch flourishing may include the concept that the righteous may experiences afflictions, like the loss of foliage a branch has in the fall. However, when the spring comes, the branches bud out again and issue its foliage. “A branch may during winter appear withered, but it drops not from the stock, and in the spring it revives and grows. So the righteous man, though he meets seasons of affliction, shall revive and flourish. He is in grafted into the true Vine, and partaking of his vital influence, shall abound in the fruits of comfort and righteousness” (Lawson 219).

Sometimes when one is going through the afflictions and distresses of life, he is tempted to think that serving the Lord will not profit and benefit him. One must hold on to the promises of God to sustain him through such times. God has promised that serving him will pay more than any other course of life.

The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree: he shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon.

Those that be planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God.

They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and flourishing;

To show that the Lord is upright: he is my rock, and there is no unrighteousness in him (Ps. 92:12-15).

One who believes God who cannot lie (Tit. 1:2) will have faith to sustain him through the hard times, knowing that those who are righteous truly shall prosper.

Guardian of Truth XLI: 11 p. 2
June 5, 1997

Does God Approve Those Whom He Loves?

By Harold Fite

While teaching a “Home-Bible Class” the man of the house came into the room. I invited him to take part in the study. He declined by saying, “I love God and he loves me. That’s all that matters.”

This person was not a Christian and did not pretend to follow the principles of Christ in his life. He relied on a faulty concept of love for his salvation. A common conception of God’s love is that “He accepts me, saves me, because he loves me. His love demands that he accept me.”

If God saved all whom he loves, no one would be lost. “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:16).

God has never acted in love, however, at the expense of truth. He does not love so as to pass over sin. His actions, whether punitive or rewarding, are always consistent with love.

The Lord loves the righteous and unrighteous. He loves the murderer, thief, adulterer, and the homosexual, but just because they come under the canopy of God’s love doesn’t mean that God is pleased with them and will save them.

God saves those who love him! Who are they? Those who “keep his commandments” (1 John 5:3). Jesus said, “If a man love me, he will keep my word: and my Father will love him, and will come unto him, and make our abode with him.” Contrariwise, “He that loveth me not keepeth not my word” (John 14:23, 24).

The world makes a distinction between love and obedience  believing that love will take care of sin. Love is essential to salvation, but no more than faith. “Love” and “faith” involve obedience: “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith working through love” (Gal. 5:6).

Love expresses itself in action: “For God so loved . . .that he gave” (John 3:16). As God expressed his love for mankind by sending his Son to die for us, our love for God will express it-self in obedience to his will. Jesus asked Peter, “Lovest thou me?” Then he called on Peter to prove it: “Feed my Iambs” (John 21:15).

To love God is to love him with all our faculties and power, to fix our affections supremely on him; to be willing to give up all we hold dear, to give our life to him and subject our will to his (Luke 10:27). We are to love him with all the faculties of soul and body and to toil and labor for his glory.

“I love God” is not some old theoretic platitude. Nor is it a magic formula for salvation. There is a lot more to it than “Honk if you love Jesus.” God’s love will not suffice for man’s disobedience. One can’t love sin away. “All the souls in hell will not be there because they were unloved by God, but because God was unloved by them.”

God loves everyone, but will only save those who love him, said love expressed by doing his will (1 John 5:3).

Guardian of Truth XLI: 11 p. 
June 5, 1997