Cecil Willis: A Friend to Preacher

By O. C. Birdwell

Before Cecil Willis was thirty years of age, he became editor of a widely distributed and highly respected religious journal called Truth Magazine. He knew what it meant to him to have the support of men like Luther Blackmon, Roy Cogdill, and a host of other older preachers. The encouragement and help they gave him, he tried to pass on to others, and especially to young preachers.

If my information is correct, in 1966, Cecil was given “The Friend of Youth” award by Florida College. His interest in and work with young people, especially young preachers, was not unnoticed. His primary interest in FC was the opportunity the school gave young men to study Bible and related subjects and to develop their skills as proclaimers of the gospel.

As editor of Truth Magazine, Cecil constantly encouraged young preachers to submit articles for publication in the paper. In the November 7, 1974, issue he announced a host of young staff writers. He gave them opportunity to teach multitudes and to be known by brethren throughout the world. Jerry McDaniel, Cecil’s good friend of Kansas City, reported that he and Cecil counted over one hundred men Cecil had influenced to begin preaching. I could take pages to discuss the many recommendations to churches on behalf of gospel preachers, hours of phone calls, thousands of letters, and much travel to assist preachers with doctrinal controversies or with local church problems. He loved the truth and loved preachers who taught the truth. He was instrumental in teaching many preachers the truth on institutionalism and encouraging them to stand. He was, indeed, a friend to preachers.

From 1959 I had a close personal friendship with Cecil that did more for my work as a gospel preacher than any other one thing. He contacted me and said the elders at Brown Street in Akron wanted me to speak on “The Mission of the Church” during their ten day meeting with different speakers. I was preaching on a lecture program with Frank Puckett, George Lemasters, and several other outstanding gospel preachers of that time. If I were out of place with such preachers, and I probably was, Cecil did not let me know it, but instead he commended my sermon and expressed sincere and warm appreciation for my efforts in discussing my subject. I later worked with churches in Kansas City, Missouri and Barberton, Ohio prima-rily because of his recommendation. Cecil was a friend to this preacher.

A Personal Letter From Cecil

The following letter is a very personal one, and I would never make it public except to let people see a side of Cecil that many did not know. Even Ann, one of Cecil’s daughters, ex-pressed to me a desire to have a copy of the letter because she felt there was a part of her father that she did not know. The letter was written when our son Gary, at nineteen years of age, was killed in a work accident.

June 5, 1972

Dear O. C. and Frances and Family,

Every since I received word early yesterday morning about the death of Gary, you have been constantly upon my mind and many times mentioned in my prayers. Sympathy, as I understand it, is entering into the feeling of another. I certainly have, so far as I am able, shared the bur-den of your grief in these recent hours. I think the fact that I have two boys so near the age of Gary has made me feel like I could better understand the burden of your grief.

I am sorry that I could not say more to you yesterday by way of expression of my feelings, but my feelings and emotions were such that I could hardly say anything at all. Perhaps had I borne your sorrow with you since Thursday night I would then have been better able to express myself.

Like George Lemasters said, I felt honored that you thought you would like for me to have some part in Gary’s service. O.C., I knew that I could not say what I really felt in my heart on that occasion, so I thought it best that I read Scripture and lead a prayer. My heart ached until I could not have said more, at the time. Through the years of our work together, particularly through our nearly daily contact in Akron, I came to love you two and your family. The thing that hurts me most about funerals is to witness the grief of people whom I love. I think I know enough about what the Bible teaches that I can stifle pretty well my grief at the passing of nearly anyone, but I have never learned to control the emotion I feel when I see people whom I love so crushed.

Both of you, as well as your entire family, certainly earned by highest esteem by the noble way that you bore your heavy sorrow. I sat and marveled at your composure. I know that I could not have done one-tenth as well. Perhaps by then, you had exhausted the means to express your grief further. I admire both of you so, as you sat there and were able to enter into the singing of those touching and meaningful songs. I was amazed as you so resolutely could sing, “Be not dismayed what ere betide, God will take care of you,” even as we proceeded out of the church building with Gary’s body being borne immediately in front of you. I am certain that your composed and faithful demeanor are bound to have had a salutary effect upon everyone present. During such a time, one’s faith is being severely tested, and you really showed you could apply, in a most difficult time, the Faith which you have preached.

I called home immediately after services last night to report the tragedy to Ioma and my children. Steve was not at home, but I know he will be terribly distraught when he learns of the accident. Ioma certainly joins with me in sending her sincerest consolations. I am sorry that I could not continue with you to the cemetery. I so much wanted to do so, and would like to have been able to spend some time with you afterward. However, I imagine by that time you were about worn out with people, and needed to be alone. We only got back eight minutes before time for services.

An incident like this is one that you really never get over. There is no point in kidding ourselves about that. There will be a certain blight over your life for the remainder of your days. Probably the experience will so affect your heart that you will be able to reach out to people in a way that you never quite could do so before. I believe that a lot of brethren have severely misapplied Romans 8:28 and try to make what-ever occurs as “good” whereas Paul specifically was talking about suffering for Christ being for our good. Such an accident is one of the misfortunes of life. I know you had such high hopes for Gary and the usage he would make of his life. No doubt in my mind, he would have followed in your steps and preached the gospel, which intention itself is a noble tribute to both of you. So many preachers have murmured and complained about their suffering as preachers until preaching is the last thing their sons would want to do.

My primary impression of Gary was that he was such a happy and cheerful boy. Whenever I saw him at Florida College, he always was smiling so, and appeared to have such a wholesome outlook on life. The large attendance of people, and particularly preachers, at the funeral service to me speaks volumes as to what brethren think of you and your life of service to God. This morning when I woke up, the first thing I thought is that I wish it were just a bad dream, and I know that such a thought must be what hits your mind every morning.

I wish so badly there were some how some way I could lift a part of your burden and bear it for you, but as we both know, there is no real way that such can be done. I can only weep with you as you weep. Beyond this we seem to be unable to go. There are apt to be days when the burden may tempt you to become bitter and cynical, but resist that temptation as much as possible.

The admirable way that you conducted yourself during the funeral service makes me even hesitate to mention that admonition. Perhaps I am only thinking as I might think, in similar circumstances.

Frankly, I nearly am glad that you were unable to get me to ask me to preach the funeral service, if that were your intention. Even that fact that you even once entertained such a thought makes me humble to know that you hold me in that esteem. George did such a beautiful job that I think it would have been unfortunate if you had gotten me and asked me to preach the funeral. I just could not have had the composure to deal with the personal matters that George so masterfully covered in his lovely speech. I would have had to have steeled myself to the occasion and merely preached a gospel sermon. My feelings would have been so wrapped up in yours that I could not have spoken as intimately as did George.

While the whole incident was crushing to me, both of you stood ten feet tall in my sight as you so nobly bore your grief. I am sure that in years to come, when I get where I can talk about the occasion, I will have occasion to use you as an ex-ample of what faith can do for persons. I shall continue to mention all of you very frequently in my prayers. I wish there were somehow some means wherebyI could vicariously bear some of your burden, but his I cannot do. However, be assured that I shall be mourning with you even as you mourn. Neither will I soon forget.

For months to come, I will so frequently pray for you, even as I know that hundreds of your brethren will be doing. Gary probably was too young to have begun to think of life as those of us who have reached maturity think of it. People often advise me to slow down, and tell me that my life could end so suddenly. The prospect of a shortened life does not dismay me or deter me in the least. I have no desire to live to be an old man. I would like to “check out” going full blast. To me, to do so would be no tragedy at all, but would be the answer of my specific prayers. I regret that what Gary could have accomplished with his life, some-one else will have to do. However, I doubt not that his passing will affect you and Johnny in such a way that you might yourselves redouble your efforts so as to accomplish what Gary might have accomplished had he lived.

Certainly this mutual loss will draw you and Frances, as well as your entire family, closer together. You now have something more in common. The passing of one so young is bound to have a beneficial effect upon everyone who seriously contemplates the incident. I grieve also for your other little ones who are so deeply hurt. I wish there were some way I could lift the weight of sorrow from young hearts. But all of you have inspired those of us who have witnessed the admirable way in which you stood up through an unbelievably trying experience. Even this occurrence has done us all good. I shall seek to imitate this honorable aspect of your faith. You have set a high goal before us who observed you struggling under a heavy load, and I shall not soon forget this wonderful example of faith.

Please pardon this reference to mundane matters, but I know that the accident and funeral services have subjected you to unexpected sizable expenses. Perhaps you had some kind of insurance that will enable you to meet the expense. But if for any reason, you are short of cash right now and need some money to meet these unexpected bills, I would count it an honor to be able to help you financially at this time. I think you know that most of us preachers do not have any backlog of cash, and neither do I. However, I would be most honored to secure for you a few hundred dollars which could be repaid whenever you wish to do so, if you need money at this time. I carry all my insurance on myself, so such an event in my family would severely press me. I would most gladly help you, to whatever degree is needed, in order to meet your bills and to pay them in full promptly. Please do not be bashful or embarrassed to take me up on this proposal. If I did not sincerely mean it, I would not propose it. Whatever you need, to the limit of my capability is at your immediate command.

If in the immediate days to come, there is any way that I can serve you, even if it is only by a brief visit with you to talk, please let me know, and I would be wonderfully happy to come on a moment’s notice, no matter if you do not think the get-together to be that important. Any thing that I can do to lighten your load right now to me is tremendously important, and I would be honored to serve you in any way!

Meanwhile, my tears shall mingle with yours until this short life shall end. I send my most fervent brotherly love and sympathetic concern to both of you and to your other dear ones. Perhaps I can only weep with you, but weep with you, I shall! I send to you my tenderest emotions and highest admiration. Please use me in any way that I can render any service to you and yours.

Brotherly, Cecil

This letter is one of the many reasons that I have said, “Cecil was a friend to preachers.” It is also one of the many reasons I had a deep and abiding love for him. I thank God that I knew him.

Guardian of Truth XLI: 15 p. 10-12
August 7, 1997

 

From a brother’s memories Granville Washington Tyler

By Leonard Tyler

Granville answered death’s summons April 13, 1996. We, in our evaluation of his life, confidently feel that he is safely moored in the harbor of God’s eternal loving peace. Granville wanted to live for both his physical and spiritual families. He loved us all so joyfully and affectionately that he craved to remain with us and offer his abilities to help guide, sustain, and maintain the purity of faith in our lives. Notwithstanding, he truly concurred with Paul’s statement, “We are confident I say, and well-pleased rather to be absent from the body and be present with the Lord.” Nevertheless, he was moved at the thought of dying, the sting of death, leaving his family and all his friends, but comforted in the hope of being at home with the Lord.

We feel that all is well with Granville, but miss him so and long for his presence; yet reality predominates and we must submit. However, we have and treasure his words of wisdom and example of life which pervades our hearts and influences our lives in the way of righteousness.

Granville was strong in character, considerate in disposition, compassionate at heart, but stubbornly firm in faith, sacrificial in life, and unquestionably confident in hope. However, he understood the need and effectiveness of prayer and freely requested the prayers of the saints.

To him, there was no compromise, substitute, or alternative for God, his word, ‘the faith” and hope it produced. It was  accept-the message of faith  or reject the God, the hope and every spiritual blessing to which “the faith” so firmly secures one. There is no God  but the one true and living God. There is no saving faith  but the faith “once for all delivered unto the saints.” God promises through this one faith, working by love the salvation for “whosoever will” come to him. Granville firmly believed this and preached it for some seventy years.

He completely depended upon the “one faith” and said to me, just a few days before surrendering to death, “Leonard, all that I have now is my faith.” He understood that his health condition was terminal. I tremblingly repeated the words spoken to our sister, Hattie, a few days before she answered death’s call. “We understand that the time will come when we can-not do or even know what can be done, and no one else on earth has the answer nor can help. But being a child of God, we “by faith” take hold of our Lord’s hand  who can and will sup-ply affectionately our every need: peace, comfort, happiness  even eternal life, in a new incorruptible body and a heavenly home with him forever and ever. Just think of that and “what must it be to be there?” We cannot imagine what God has prepared for those who love him. But we can be sure  “This is the victory that overcomes the world, even our faith.” Think on these things and hold fast to the hand of him who can and will help when all others fail.

Family Life  How Important

I cannot tell the story of Granville’s faithful, preaching life without mentioning a little family background. It may seem redundant to you but, believe me, it was relative to his life and is to ours. The powerful influence of a true mother and father upon the lives of their boys and girls is inestimable. I hope that relating this will help impress the true value that a Christian mother and father, poor economically or materially, but rich in faith, can and will help mold their children’s lives when they bring them up in the “training and admonition of the Lord.” This is not just vain thinking, family pride, nor simply a glorification of our parents. It is stating the true value of parents who fill their place in God’s divine arrangement and responsibility placed upon mothers and fathers to their own children. As to our parents some facts follow and you judge. But we know what it means to us.

The Fourth Sunday in July 1907

James Edward Tyler and Mattie Derinda McGahey were on their way to worship, riding in a buggy, at Beech Valley, Hickman County, Tennessee. The meeting was to begin that Sun-day. They met the preacher on their way and were married, sitting in the buggy. This was to be a surprise, but turned out a surprise to them. The preacher reached the pulpit, he smilingly turned and announced, “Brother and sister Jim Tyler are to be congratulated. They were married by me on their way to church this morning.”

This was the beginning of their happy, harmonious, but brief lives together of sixteen years. To this union eight children were born: four boys; Granville, Gilbert, Leonard, and Ellis, and four girls; Hattie, Florida, Mary Alice (died at birth), and Florence (Glenda) about two years apart.

Papa and Mama made a paradoxical claim, “We never had a real fuss.” No, it was not Papa’s dictating to Mama. They discussed their choices and made decisions. It is true Papa made the final judgment, but Mama’s voice was heard before the decision was made. He, on going to town (we lived in the rural community), would not even buy an apple without bringing her one and later sharing with us. You may question the statement, but they confidently affirmed it and we had no reason to doubt it. They should have planted this disposition a little deeper into our hearts.

Mama liked to cook and was a good one. She endeavored to keep a cookie jar with cookies in it most of the time, even though most of them were sorghum molasses cookies. But they were delicious and our buddies (playmates) would try to trade us out of them. Al-though Mama had taught us to share, we somehow learned to protect our cookies. If the trade was not a little in our favor, there was no trade.

Mama was more fortunate than Papa educationally. She was a great help to Papa in studying the Bible. It was hard for him to read comprehensively; however, in due time he was a pretty good Bible student and later in life was able to preach some. He enjoyed preaching (Mama never got to hear him). She deeply loved and respected him and taught us to do the same. We were taught to appreciate and obey our parents, or as Papa would say, “If you do not, you will suffer for it.” He didn’t mean just his discipline but throughout life. They believed that respecting parental authority was basic to any and all authority in life.

Mama often reminded us that we were poor financially. We wore home-made jeans and patched clothes “but there is one thing for sure, you don’t have to go dirty.” She made it her business to see that we didn’t. She especially wanted us to have a good education and advised us to use it wisely. She warned us against taking advantage of others’ physical handicaps or weaknesses, “They cannot help these, so be understanding and helpful. Always treat others with respect, for we need the respect of others. But we want to be respectful, regardless. If you will respect yourself, you’ll have respect for others. Remember that God loves and respects you and you should always love and respect him for his ways and judgments are true and eternal. Seek him in your life for his ways are always right and lead to eternal blessings.”

Mother knew that her health was rapidly failing and would soon terminate. One night she was discussing the children with Papa. Granville over-heard their conversation. She explained each of us to him. (Her expressions are not direct quotes. I have repeated them as they were given to me, however I use quotation marks to identify them.) “Granville can be a great help with the other children. He is the oldest and very sober minded. Gilbert is high-strung, quick-tempered, hard-headed and determined. Leonard is light-hearted, talkative, and playful. Ellis is still just a little boy. The girls are so young. Hattie is growing fast and thinks well for her age. Florida is more dependent, emotional, and sensitive. Florence is only a baby and needs so much care. They are all good children but need someone to share with them. Jim, I believe that you can depend on Granville  with God’s help  you all can make it.”

I wondered why we were respected as we were, being as poor economically as any of the rest. Yet, we were accepted and treated as if we had more. Gilbert asked some of his friends this question. His report was, “They said, your family does not act, look, or talk like the others.” Why was that? My answer: Our parents were trying to make an honest living working, respecting others, being Christians, and rearing us to be good citizens and Christians. Another thing, Papa al-ways found some work sufficient to put bread on the table and clothes on our backs. He believed in work and was busy doing something most of the time.

Mama was sick about eighteen months before death claimed her. Granville, being the oldest, naturally became the leader in helping care for us. Most families were large, at this period in history, and the older would help care for the younger. Granville was serious-minded, tender-hearted, and very protective. We, the other boys, were not too cooperative. We felt that we were able to take care of ourselves and once in a while we tried to enforce it. It was at this period that Granville got one of his favorite stories about my crying to go with Gilbert and him. He delighted in telling it after we began to conduct meetings together. It went like this:

“Leonard was the third boy and Gilbert and I, being older, felt that we should be able to go places and do things with-out Leonard tagging along. We would get permission to do so sometimes; but when Leonard saw us leaving, he would call out, ‘I wanta go.’ We would object and he would appeal to Mama. If she agreed with us, he would start crying and finally Mama would call to us, `You boys let Leonard go with you.’ We did, but the welcome was not too gracious. We walked faster than he could or would. He would holler `Wait fer me,’ and start crying. One day it started to rain, and we took off running. Leonard began to cry and call out, `Wait fer me  wait fer me!’ I looked back and yelled, `Stop that bawling and come on! We are getting wet too.’ Naturally, when he told the story, he colored it up to suit his purpose. He drew it out and, I thought, put too much emphasis on crying. Notwithstanding, when problems or challenges came our way, we turned to Granville. He responded, most times, in our favor but gave us a stem warning, ‘Never, and I mean never again.’ But it happened over and over again.”

Mama passed from this life about 4 a.m. March 24, 1924, making her stay upon the earth thirty-five years, four months and nine days. Her funeral was conducted in the Little Rock meeting house, Hickman County, Tennessee, a rural community about fifteen miles north of Centerville, just off of 100 Highway where she attended the services of the church when a small girl and her daddy preached sometimes. Granville confessed his faith in Christ in this same building (it still stands with a little addition) and was baptized in Mill Creek which continues to flow just behind it.

After the burial, we were sitting together by the grave side while friends passed offering their condolences and sympathy. Mrs. Anna Rice, an old friend of the family (we called her “cousin Anna”), leaned over Papa’s shoulders patting him on the back and wonderingly asked, “Jim, what in the world are you going to do with the children?” Papa looked up, then dropped his head, shaking it and stammeringly answered, “I don’t know, Anna, but we are going to stay together.” How? He had not thought about the “how.” Neither had any of us, so far as I ever knew. We all knew that we belonged and that this was some-thing that we must bear together. But hearing Papasay, “I don’t know, Anna, but we are going to stay together,” were the most comforting words he could have spoken.

The marks of Mama’s death we still bear, and the decision, “I don’t know, Anna, but we are going to stay together” we treasure. That is what we all wanted to do and these words still echo in my heart: “I don’t know, Anna, but we are going to stay together.”

The cemetery is on a sloping hill overlooking the building where Mama’s funeral was conducted and Granville confessed his faith in Christ. Mill Creek still flows gently along at the foot of the bluff where he was baptized into Christ. In this beautiful historic landscape Mama was laid to rest on March 26, 1924. Some forty years later Papa was placed by her side where he often requested to be placed at death. Side by side they lie in death’s slumber and we affectionately say, “Mama, you and Papa sleep on in God’s peaceful care until the trumpet sounds and we will meet you with the Lord in the air.”

After Mama’s funeral, we returned home on “Hunter’s Hill,” to begin, it seemed, our lives all over. This tragedy bound us closer together bearing and sharing the responsibilities, successes and joys of life with its disappointments, burdens, and sorrows when reality suddenly bore upon us. Notwithstanding, and factually speaking, we stayed together but our lives were never the same. Yet, the older children had an advantage over the younger. The younger never enjoyed the warm influencing, stabilizing security that we had for a very seasoning, powerful and loving part of the family was lost. However, they accepted Papa and the older ones became advisors, examples, and leaders. But as time passed, one by one, we accepted the responsibilities of life and left home. Granville was the first  the next in age became the leader. One can understand the younger had a rougher road to travel. We commend them for maintaining the purity of attitude and disposition in building beautiful characters. We greatly appreciate and love them dearly and they reciprocate freely with an open heart.

Papa was working at the rock quarry ten hours per day, six days a week to provide a living while parenting seven children. Yes, it was troublesome times but we were together. One of Papa’s old friends asked him, “Uncle Jimmy” (as most of his old acquaintances called him), “does all this cause you to doubt your faith?” He unhesitatingly responded, “No, I had to give up Mattie! But my faith is what holds me up and gives me reason to live with a steadfast hope that after a while we shall meet again.” May I insert, “So far as any of us ever knew Papa never questioned his faith, much less doubted it.”

How Our Family Adjusted

Granville continued watching after us in Papa’s absence after Mama’s death. He accepted the responsibility seriously and, all considered, did a commendable job. However, it was needful that more help be obtained since Florida and Geda were under school age. Uncle Mort and Aunt Bessie, Mama’s brother and his wife, were of great help; and with some acquired help, we (with time  the two girls reached school age) made it through. During this period, we moved into Wrigley, a little village of company-owned houses for the employees. The environment was not the best. There were a large number of unkept, undisciplined boys and girls just running loose. We joined them and came up with head lice.

Papa’s mother, “Grand Mammy” we called her, came to visit and was sorely grieved at our situation. One day after delivering my Grit Papers, I came home to find Grand Mammy with Geda kneeling on the porch with her head in her lap, a fine tooth comb, combing her hair, weeping. She was talking to herself, “This poor little girl has no mother to care for her and just look what I have found  head lice.” She reported it to Papa and he went to Centerville, the nearest drugstore, and got the prescribed remedy. We all saturated our heads with it. It worked. This became al-most a common practice through the years because we got just about every catchable thing that came to school. Papa followed the same procedure  go get the remedy, apply it and we were well again. On one occasion, several years later, Papa brought enough medication for the itch to share with our neighbors, took it over to them and requested that they use it. He told them that there was no need curing the itch on his children and theirs giving it right back to them. They accepted it, used it and all was well for awhile.

The summer after Mama’s death Granville’s first job was a water boy at the rock quarry for $1.25 per day. We kids managed ourselves while Papa and Granville were working. It was not as glamorous as we thought it would be, but we pulled through. That fall he returned to school and finished the eighth grade. He then went to work as oil boy at the main plant. After reaching seventeen, he was promoted to engineer over the pumps, large turbines, and blowing engine of the blast furnace. His pay was $3.60 per day, the hours were from six to six, seven days or nights per week, shift work  two weeks days and two weeks nights.

Papa transferred to the main plant as fireman in the boiler room on shift work just as Granville. We were still walking to Little Rock for worship, a little over a mile. Several had joined us in the walk. Among the group, a young lady, Nannie Hethcoat, caught Papa’s eye. She was much younger than he; nevertheless, they became very close friends. Their interest grew in each other very rapidly. Soon Papa concluded that she would fit right into our family. They were married in 1925.

Soon after the wedding we moved to the Baker Hollow, about a mile and a half northwest of Lyle. We worshiped at Lyle while living here. Papa remembered the cliché, “An idle brain is the devil’s workshop,” only he substituted the word “boy” for “brains.” His thinking was to keep us out of evil’s temptations, “keep us busy working and the farm would do that.” It did keep us busy. After two years we moved into Lyle about halfway between Dickson and Centerville. Papa rented some land near Lyle for us to work.

The boys who attended “Sunday School” formed the habit of going to town after Bible class. We kind of liked that so we asked Papa about our doing the same. He suggested that we came to worship God and thought that we should stay for the worship. We stayed.

At home this same spirit prevailed. Papa had prayer every night, except when we attended church services and had prayer there. He also gave thanks before each meal. On some occasions, humorous happenings occurred. One noon when Papa was saying thanks, Junior, the youngest, had formed the habit of repeating the “amen” with Papa at the close of the thanks, so he said, “amen.” Papa continued right on with his prayer. Junior said, “hush Papa, Papa hush, I’ve done said `amen.”‘ Papa stopped and we all laughed.

One night it was time for the prayer, but Papa was a little late. The girls were in another room studying or playing; Geda, the youngest girl, had gone to sleep. The custom was for all of us to come into one room for the prayer. Papa called for all to come in for our prayer. We all gathered, except Geda. Papa noticed her absence and inquired, “Where is Geda?” One of the girls answered, “She is down in yonder.” Geda was so sleepy that she had just rolled off the bed and kneeled. Papa said, “Tell her to come in here.” She came in and the prayer was said.

Papa’s sincerity was shown at the church services just as it was at home. For instance, we were engaged in a series of gospel meetings one fall. The weather was extra cold and rainy, a good number had assembled for the service, but the preacher did not show. One of our standard-bearers stood up and said, “I guess we had just as well go home; the preacher is not here.” Papa spoke up, “Don’t you think that we should at least sing, read the scriptures, and have a prayer, since we came to worship God?” This gentleman stood up, looked around and asked, “Where is my old hat? I am going home.” His hat was hanging on the wall. He got it and stalked out.

We stayed, sang, read Scriptures, offered a few words of admonition, sang another song and dismissed. Papa asked us after we got home, “Boys, don’t you feel that we did the right thing? I know I feel better.” We all agreed.

This was typical of Papa’s life. He didn’t practice this only in the presence of others, but in any crisis or trouble-some problem he could be found reading the Bible and in his prayer, he would always ask God to help him make the right decision. He truly trusted the Lord. Mama’s faith was just as strong. She led us early in life, but her powerful influence in our home formation was a cornerstone in our spiritual life. Our parents appreciated, proclaimed, and practiced their faith in the Lord. What a blessing for the children!

This kind of practice and influence ingrained in us an appreciation of Biblical morality, self-respect, reliance, and virtue in all of life. Moral virtues were implanted mostly through conversation arising from some incident or occurrence which happened in our community. And many of various stripes were evident. They explained with feelings toward the guilty, but no mistake was ever “white-washed” or overlooked. The results were pointed out with emphasis. Then they would kindly but firmly suggest how much better the victim would have been had the wrong never been committed. If young people could grasp the tragic results of these flamboyant acts or deeds, surely they would never corrupt their bodies and destroy their lives by them.

During the moves and passing of time to this second marriage three children were born: one boy, Junior; two girls, Hazel and Evelyn. For a number of years everything moved smoothly with no evident problems. But time brings changes in environment, associations, and age which affect feelings, dispositions, and even lives. It seems that these life-affecting influences, as well as an adventurous spirit or attitude, bore upon this relationship until problems arose. The relationship continued until, it seems, that about the time the girls really needed a true mother for love and guidance, she found interest elsewhere and left Papa and the children. There was never a question, “with whom shall the children stay?” They stayed with Papa.

A Broken Home

A broken home is most injurious regardless of how passionately, soberly, and carefully handled. Scars are left in the hearts of all in the destroyed relationship, especially the children. It takes years of sober thinking and patient effort to even free oneself of guilt. Children are not responsible for separations. The responsibility rests upon the husband and wife, both, or the faltering one. The best solution to rebuild confidence in self and others is a strong faith in Almighty God. This will help to reestablish self-respect and even faith in others. There are weak people everywhere one looks. However, there are trustworthy, caring people who will lend a helping hand. One must never allow the failures of the weak and blundering to destroy his life. Yes, you can overcome through determination, patience, perseverance, and years of hard, expectant labor. The goal for which one seeks is peace at heart, self confidence, contentment, stabilization, and hope for the future. This may be attained by scrutinizing your situation and observing the paths of opportunities and start working. When one climbs out of the fog of blame and doubt, he can see the clear blue sky with the sun shining brightly. He can sing, “what once I sowed in tears, I can now reap in joy.” One must remember  faith is in God. “If God be for you, who can be against you?”

It is interesting to note that Papa with all the problems, adverse circumstances, unwise choices and misjudged decisions, led the ten children left with him, without a mother, to obey the gospel before leaving home. Papa was very human and made many mistakes (we recognized some of them), but he bore it all with faith and kept struggling. We may wonder, “why did he do some things?” But a greater question is, “How did he do what he did?” The only answer I can give, “He did it with faith in God and love toward all.”

Granville was innately endowed from his family relationship and association with a good mind, not a genius, but a workable, comprehensible intellect applicable to any occasion or situation. His reasoning power was evident and exemplified in his spirit-led physical life. His attitude enabled him to live in the world but not be of the world. His faith in and deep respect for both God and man gave him a moral consciousness of right and wrong with a passionate desire to advance in the right. These characterizing attributes motivated him to advance rapidly in whatever he chose to do. In his work at the Wrigley plant he enjoyed unexpected advancement from water boy in the engine room at the main plant to engineer over the large turbines and water pumps which supplied electricity and water to the Wrigley community, as well as the entire plant plus the big blowing engine for the blast furnace. Within two years from 16 to 18 years of age he went from a beginner’s salary of $1.20 to a top dollar of $3.60 per day. This proved true in his high school work. He completed his courses and graduated within three years.

His becoming a preacher of the gospel of Christ was no exception. He found support and magnified encouragement from the time he began to read, lead prayer, teach a class, make talks, and visit other churches. Their voices were al-most in unison, “You will make a great preacher.” Of course, there was the resounding echo, “Don’t let all this go to your head.” But remember, this was after the missionary society and instrumental music problems and before the institutional-centralization division. The church of our Lord was at peace. A faithful gospel preacher was welcomed wherever the saints met and encouraged to preach “the old Jerusalem gospel in its purity and power.” Oh yes, there were “soft and hard preachers,” but most congregations wanted good sound Bible-filled sermons and the church was growing. The members studied the Scriptures and could quote them to confirm their faith. They even taught others God’s saving power.

Within this setting and time, brother W.B. West, Jr., a young preacher, came to Lyle where we lived for a series of gospel meetings. He learned of Granville’s interests in the work of the Lord and invited him to speak at one of the day services. Granville accepted. Brother West was impressed and from that day on Granville had a dear friend. Brother West encouraged him to prepare himself better for preaching. He went with him to Nashville, Tennessee for a conference with brother H. Leo Boles, president of David Lipscomb College. Granville thought that he might take some special course and start preaching. However, brother Boles learned his age (20 years) and encouraged him to finish high school.

Granville preferred David Lipscomb High School, but the expense was more than he could afford. Brother West recommended the Tallahatchie Agricultural High School at Charleston, Mississippi, where he could work on the farm for his board and tuition. He accepted the proposition and resigned at Wrigley, packed his belongings and tearfully left home for Charleston, Mississippi. That September 11 he was 21 years of age. He said, “That is when I began my education and my life’s work as a preacher of the gospel.” Even here he found favor. The superintendent of the school, Mr. W.W. Gunn, although not a member of the church, learned that he wished to preach and gave him extra time off from farm work to study with no cut in pay. Several of the churches near Charles-ton invited him to preach for them. This helped him financially. He never received a penny from home all through school. During the depression he helped some of the younger ones.

During the summers, while other boys and girls were vacationing, Granville conducted gospel meetings. Hickman County had sixty-five churches with open doors and a welcome to him. He had all the meetings he was able to preach. This continued into the last year of his life. He declined invitations in 1995. No preacher was more appreciative and thankful for such confidence than he. He said to me, “Leonard, I hate to tell people I can’t come.”

These observations do not exalt Granville above human limitations. He was just a common country boy grasping every opportunity to advance in life. He was humble, deeply concerned for others, and emotionally and conscientiously devoted to preaching the gospel of Christ. However, he never forgot where he came from or who he was. This does not imply that Granville was special with God or above others in the favor of God. He was just a young man with a burning desire to live a useful life in the service of the Lord and to willingly work for it. This disposition was recognized by others  they freely gave their encouragement and help. I believe that such will be as true today as it was then for those who will dare to set their ambition on living a useful, beneficial, righteous life and are willing to work for it. God’s blessings will be upon them. Our society may have trodden underfoot many of our moral and virtuous standards, but never so low but what she will appreciate and encourage one who lives a virtuous, useful life.

Granville’s disposition made it a real challenge for him to point out differences when it seemed to hurt or stir ill feelings  notwithstanding, he would always plainly and positively state his understanding of biblical teaching. Yet, it was done with full consideration of his opponent’s feelings and understanding. Some of his lifelong friends view differently concerning the institutional and centralizational work for the church  they take a much more liberal stance. Granville felt that Paul’s question to the Galatians, “Have I therefore become your enemy because Hell you the truth?” applied to the speaker as well as to the hearer. His view, “You do not become my enemy because I tell you the truth. I love you and want you to understand  This is God’s truth, not my opinion.”

Could I humbly assert? “No two brothers were ever more closely bound together through blood and faith than Granville and I. We were at times separated for several months without contact, but the love and closeness were ever present and still fills my heart. I seriously doubt if any two preachers ever agreed more understandingly on any and all the “brotherhood questions” and difficult passages of the Bible than we. Yet, as stated before, we had many long and hard discussions on just about all the problems. When a new one would reach the papers, I wondered, will this one be the dividing of understanding between us. It was not. The last one was Jesus Christ  is he both divine and human while upon the earth? We both accepted Jesus the Christ as both Deity and human. He is both the Son of God and the son of man.

It seemed to me that he had a little more trouble getting a clear and firm understanding of the orphan problem than I. However, when he studied, he reached the firm conclusion that extra organizations had no right attaching themselves to church for support, claiming to be doing the work of the church. The church is sufficiently designed and equipped to accomplish whatsoever God commissioned her to do even as she did in the first century. The church is God’s divine creation to serve upon the earth his divine purpose  as created, de-signed and commissioned so shall we serve and “give glory to God throughout all ages, world without end,” even to the saving of the soul. We must keep “speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head  Christ.”

There was no preacher whom I ever knew more sincere and emotionally involved in the Lord’s service than Granville. He believed what he was doing was fulfilling the commission of the Lord for the salvation of the soul. Al-though, I have heard people say, “He cried too much,” that was his deep respect for the Lord, his message and concern for the lost. There was no false manifestation portrayed in Granville’s life to deceive  much less in his preaching. He recognized that an account would be made to the Lord for his life and preaching. He sought to make both accept-able to the Lord. He, again, accepted Paul’s statement as his: “Necessity is laid upon me; yes, woe is me if I preach not the gospel  I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more (KJV).

Yet, Granville cultivated a joyful heart. He loved and often illustrated his lessons with a good, clean, true, comical story. This, he thought, would help relieve the unnecessary tension and help to open their ears to his message. If he could touch their hearts with the word of truth, it would produce the faith and move them to accept the Lord. His illustrations must be subservient to the message, whether a one-liner or a true story.

Granville loved to visit brother Thad Henley, a faithful member of the church and an elder at Ettna, Tennessee. He and his brother, Dave, were born, reared, educated and lived country. They were happy with whom they were and every-body liked them. They had somewhat of a whine, unintentional but pronounced. Each of them had some very interesting happenings in their lives to tell that they could make a grouch laugh. Granville conducted several gospel meetings at Ettna and stayed with brother Thad. He loved the association and the stories brother Thad told. He also loved to repeat the stories to others and even illustrate his lessons by some of them. He would mimic brother Thad’s voice and actions so well that he was often asked to do so.

He was living at Russellville, Alabama when brother I.A. Douthitt conducted a meeting for them. Granville told some of the stories in brother Douthitt’s presence. He was living at Hohenwald, Tennessee, which was near Ettna and brother Thad visited there often. Brother I.A. saw him and related Granville’s imitating him. A few weeks later Granville came to Ettna for a meeting. After one of the services when most of the crowd was gone, brother Thad confronted Granville with: “Brother Granful, brother I.A. Douthitt tells me you can mock me as good as I can talk.” He said, “If you was in one room and I was in one room, side by side, and we was talking and he wanted to see me, he wonten’t know which room to go in.” Granville knew that brother Thad would not mind, but the sudden confrontation puzzled Granville. He responded, “I guess that is right. Would you like to hear me?” “Well, if you want to,” brother Thad replied. Granville started in on one of his stories. The people heard Granville and gathered around. They wondered about it  Granville talking like brother Thad and him standing, looking, not saying a word. Those gathered around almost fell out laughing. Brother Thad didn’t say a word. Granville was staying with him during the meeting. He had lunch with him that day and visited all afternoonnot a word was mentioned about the imitation. That night after the services, they were sitting out on the porch, in the dark, in the cane-bottomed chairs, leaning against the wall. They had talked out so they were silent, just kind of pondering. Brother Thad broke the silence, “Brother ‘Ganful’, don’t you think you whine a little bit mor’n I do?” Granville said, “I guess you are right. You know one has to exaggerate when imitating another to make it stand out.” “Well, I thought  shorely you did.”

Granville and brother Thad were very close and enjoyed one another as much as two could, I guess, although he had a story or two about brother Dave, Thad’s brother, alike in speech and thought. Granville loved good clean, non-reflective fun and had his share. He always kept a sense of humor and it bridged him over so many hard situations. The statement has been made, “His sermons could have you laughing and crying during his delivery but each emotional response impressed the value of his lesson.” He didn’t use them to entertain nor to attract attention to himself, but to illuminate the thoughts he was endeavoring to present.

Guardian of Truth XLI: 14 p. 16-22
July 17, 1997

Cecil Willis – The Akron Years

By Connie W. Adams

Cecil Willis moved to Akron, Ohio in 1958 to work with the Brown Street congregation which had begun in 1941 as a peaceful “swarm” from Thayer Street. Charles M. Campbell had preached there for several years. Cecil followed Jesse Wiseman. The church had grown to over 300 in attendance by the time Cecil came. During his years at Brown Street, attendance often ran to 350-360. Akron was then the rubber capitol of the world with a number of large plants producing tires.

During the early part of his work here, he preached a series on Masonry. After the first sermon, one of the men asked to meet with the elders and told them that there were a number of Masons in the congregation and that if they did not shut that preacher up about it, he would see to it that they withheld their contributions so they would not be able to pay his salary. He also told them that if any of them told what he said he would deny it. The elders met with Cecil and passed on the information. He told them they could decide whether he could occupy the pulpit or not, but they could not determine what he would preach and that if allowed to continue he would proceed with his series. They assured him they knew he would say that and stood behind him. Before Cecil left Brown Street there were no Masons in the congregation.

The Situation in the Ohio Valley

The division over church support of private institutions and sponsoring churches had become a reality in most parts of the nation by the late 50s, except for the Ohio Valley. Many congregations were oblivious to the issues which received so much attention elsewhere. There were well known and highly respected men who took a neutral position, and many congregations attempted to follow that lead. In the early 1960s the Ohio Valley College was founded in Parkersburg, West Virginia and it soon became evident that the school would be managed by men sympathetic with the institutional movement. Through the influence of the school, a number of men who were well known in the south and southwest for their convictions in favor of the innovations, were brought into the Valley to teach at the school (J.M. Powell, brother-in-law of B.C. Goodpasture, editor of the Gospel Advocate, served as president for several years, and Clifton Inman became head of the Bible Department), speak on annual lecture programs, or conduct meetings throughout the Valley.

A Counter Offensive

In September 1962, Cecil Willis began his work as editor of Truth Magazine. In time this paper, then based in Akron, became a powerful influence in awakening brethren throughout the Ohio Valley as to what was taking place and provided a forum through which the issues could be studied. A number of strong men in the 1960s added the weight of their influence to ground as many churches in the truth as possible. Franklin T. Puckett preached at Thayer Street, followed by Guy Roberson and then Truman Smith. O.C. Birdwell preached at Barberton, Weldon Warnock at Kenmore where he followed Paul Casebolt. Morris Norman worked at Southeast in Akron. George LeMasters had considerable influence. Largely through the influence of Cecil Willis, Luther Blackmon came to preach at Bedford, Ohio. A.E. Dicus was at Lorain Avenue in Cleveland and Paul Kelsey was at Berea. Austin Mobley came to work at Tallmadge. Earl Robertson published a bulletin and had a radio program at Moundsville with wide influences. William E. Wallace worked in the area. Strong men were brought into the area for gospel meetings.

In 1965 the elders at Brown Street decided to support two preachers and I was invited to join Cecil Willis in this work. The plan was to have one of us free to go anywhere a door opened for us to preach. For five years this work continued. We conducted 30-40 meetings a year. We also began a bulletin published monthly called The Enlightener which was sent free to any who requested it. We developed a mailing list of 9,000. We gave the institutional issues heavy attention. Some were irate. Preachers condemned it from the pulpit and urged members to “throw it in the trash.” But many read, at first out of curiosity, then developed interest and many learned the truth. Few were ambivalent toward such efforts.

We were warned in some places not to speak on “the issues.” That was the surest way to get us to do exactly that! Preaching the principles was fine. Some would readily agree until they realized what the application involved. Cecil used to say, “You have to draw a picture of a pig on the board, and then right down under in big letters you have to write P-I-G.”

When one of the Willis children developed a serious illness, Cecil moved his family to Indiana so he could be home more until that situation was stabilized. We arranged for Ferrell Jenkins to join us in the work and the same arrangements continued. Lest anyone think all we ever did was preach on “the issues” during those years, we averaged baptizing 120 people a year between the meetings and the work at Brown Street. We began a series of special winter classes out of which came a number of preachers and teachers. Many of our meetings were ten or eleven day meetings and most of the baptisms came the last two or three days of the meetings. We preached in nice buildings but also wherever the brethren had to meet. In one year I conducted meetings in a small house with partitions removed to provide seating space (in Michigan), in a court house, (Illinois), in an American Legion building (also in Illinois),and in a store front (Ohio). Cecil and I alternated in going to Salem, Ohio on Thursday nights to teach a mid-week Bible class. We drove many miles just to meet and study with interested brethren. Many came to Akron to study with us.

Three Significant Debates

In September 1966, Cecil Willis met Clifton Inman of Ohio Valley College in a four nights debate in Parkersburg, West Virginia. The debate was conducted in a school auditorium with a large, attentive and respectful crowd present each night. This debate was printed in 1968 with the introduction written by James P. Needham who moderated for Cecil Willis. A second debate between these two men took place the following spring in Dayton, Ohio.

In December 1967, Ferrell Jenkins met Bill Heinselman in debate in Akron, with two nights in the Brown Street building and two at Westside in Akron. 500-600 attended each night of this discussion. Good order prevailed and much good was done. The December 1967 issue of The Enlightener carried the debate charts used by Ferrell Jenkins.

The combined impact of all these efforts was significant. I know of twenty-five congregations which got off the fence and took a stand for the truth during those years. While many factors came together to bring that about, there is no doubt that Cecil Willis and his influence played a dominant role in that.

One of the Brown Street elders paid Cecil a compliment when, after seven years of work there at that time, he said “Cecil’s preaching is as fresh now as it was when he first came here.” The reason for that was that Cecil Willis never stopped studying. While he was not opposed to using good material he had prepared and used at other places, in local work he made it a point to prepare at least one new sermon every week and always reworked material he had used before.

True Yokefellows

Our work together was most pleasant. We traded the pulpit back and forth, leaving each other notes as to what we had preached on and where we stopped in the Bible classes we each taught. Each of us trusted the other to cover the material assigned in the Bible classes, so that we would not be in a continual review and make no progress. Both of us ruffled a few feathers with some folks. When someone came to me and complained about Cecil, I immediately began to praise his work. When some came to him and complained about me, he did the same thing and the complainers got nowhere and soon stopped. When we had an honest disagreement on the application of a passage, we each presented what we believed about it and left it to the class or congregation to study the matter and reach their own conclusion. We never had one cross word between us. Our friendship began in college days at Florida Christian College. But our work together in Akron was one of the most productive periods of my life as a preacher and I shall ever be grateful to Cecil for the influence he had on my life. For eight years I worked with him on Truth Magazine and benefitted greatly from that association.

Repentance

Others have detailed the tragic circumstances of about ten years in his life when he entered an unscriptural marriage and was not faithful to the Lord. Those were painful years for his family and close friends. Along with other friends, I made several attempts at reasoning with him about his life. These were all rebuffed. But in 1986, his unscriptural marriage ended. I was in a meeting in East Texas in June 1986 and called to see if I could come to Woodlake and see him. I made it clear that I wanted to talk to him about his soul. He told me to come on, he would be glad to see me. For several hours we sat on the back of a farm wagon at the Willis homeplace and talked. He admitted to me that his second marriage was adulterous and that he had “rationalized” his situation partly out of loneliness and frustration. He stated that he knew he had caused a lot of heartache for a lot of people. We discussed steps to make it right with the Lord and with brethren. Not long after that, he went before the church at Groveton, Texas where he had obeyed the gospel, preached his first sermon, where his parents then attended, and made a statement of repentance for any and all sins and for the damage they had done to so many. A copy of that statement was sent to the church at Huntsville, Texas (which had withdrawn from him), to other congregations where he had worked and where much pain and anguish had been caused. He sought the forgiveness of family members. A statement was published in Searching the Scriptures and in Guardian of Truth to let a wider audience know.

He accepted a very low profile the rest of his life. The eagle with the broken wing never soared as high again. If there was any resentment because he was not as widely called upon as before, I never saw any trace of it. He blamed himself for the damage done to his reputation. For awhile he worked with the small church in Fairbanks, Alaska. Then he came back to Woodlake, Texas to take care of his aging parents and was asked to preach for the small church at Groveton, which he did for several years. During these years he battled with increasing health problems and lived on the verge of kidney dialysis with only one kidney functioning at about 15%. His work at Salem, Ohio was off to a good start when health problems worsened and death resulted.

I shall miss my good friend. He left giant footprints on the sands of time in spite of the those tragic ten years. Good men can do wrong and damage their once powerful influence. God commands all men everywhere to repent (Acts 17:30) and then he requires that we forgive even as the Lord has forgiven us when we repent (Col. 3:13). I hope good brethren will remember the great good done by my good friend and brother. “The judgments of God are according to truth” (Rom. 2:2).

Guardian of Truth XLI: 15 p. 3-5
August 7, 1997

Observations on Thirty Years of Preaching (2)

By Dick Blackford

My wife didn’t think the first article on Observations was one of my better attempts at writing. I too, viewed it as mediocre so we were surprised that it sparked several responses. That was also the case with the articles written on this subject at ten and twenty year intervals. I am persuaded it must be the subject matter for I received nine letters, two phone calls, and several word of mouth comments  all from preachers. Two of them suggested I write a follow up. One asked that I write on changes I have seen in 30 years of preaching. Another on my theology of preaching. I am assuming I understand what that means. First, I want to consider some changes I have seen, both good and bad.

1. More Acceptance Of People From Different Races Or Social Classes. We still have a long way to go. Most congregations I am familiar with are made up of white middle class Americans. I hope we are not content with this for God is no respecter of persons (Rom. 2:11; Jas. 2:9). But this is a better mixture than what I remember 30 years ago. I have visited a congregation that literally had red, yellow, black, and white members. That did not cause any problems. I know some congregations that are predominantly white but have one or more black elders or deacons. I have also observed members who had professions which made them millionaires who regularly socialized with members that made less than $25,000 annually. This is as it should be (Jas. 2). The church at Antioch was a racially mixed church (Acts 11:19f). Yet they were the ones who grew and thrived and sent Paul and Barnabas out on their first journey. Race did not seem to be a problem. Is it any wonder the disciples were called “Christians” first at Antioch (Acts 11:26)?

2. More Willingness To Forgive Sins Of Immorality. I know cases where I thought it would be hard for an individual or a congregation to forgive a person of a particular sin and fully accept the one who committed it. But they did. We can-not afford to do otherwise. Jesus said one who can’t forgive should be delivered to the tormentors (Matt. 18:21-35).

Bad Changes

1. More Churches splitting. One brother made a joke upon his departure from a luncheon. He said, “Let’s make like a church and split.” A split church is no laughing matter, but it is becoming proverbial. Thirty years ago there were still churches dividing over institutionalism. Very few were dividing over anything else. The command is to “maintain unity” (Eph. 4:1-3). There is no command to physically divide a church. There is no example of such a thing happening. The only way one might arrive at the conclusion that he should leave a congregation is through a necessary inference. In a situation where one is being forced to practice error by his remaining in a congregation, he would be compelled to leave. Collective error, such as singing with an instrument or donating to institutional projects in which the individual becomes a partaker in sin (since he is commanded to sing and give), would fall in that category. More and more I am hearing of congregations dividing over personal problems and attitudes.

The church at Sardis was condemned by the Lord for being a dead church, having “found no works perfected before my God.” It needed to repent (Rev. 3:1-6). However, he said there were some in the congregation who had not de-filed their garments and they shall walk with me in white, for they are worthy” (3:4). The error in Sardis apparently was not of a collective nature and one could still be faithful and serve the Lord in that congregation regardless of some-one else’s behavior. Though there were numerous errors in the church at Corinth, not once did Paul even hint at the idea that they should physically divide. He told them to solve their problems.

2. Less Churches With Elders. There are fewer men who desire the eldership today. Here are some possible explanations why: (a) It seems like a thankless task, a no-win situation in which you cannot please everyone. This may be because we are looking for our reward here and now. We are not here to receive glory from men, nor to please everyone. We should be seeking God’s approval. Christians who want to see the Lord’s will carried out should remember to encourage and assist godly elders. The Bible says they are worthy of double honor (1 Tim. 5:17-19); (b) Some don’t want to be tied down. They forget Jesus was nailed down. True Christianity involves a willingness to deny yourself. Are we totally or only partially committed to the Lord  when Christianity doesn’t interfere with our lifestyle)? (c) Christian men are not as spiritually mature as they were 30 years ago. This is a generalization. I know several exceptions, for whom I am grateful to God. But there are less men willing to try to qualify and make the sacrifices necessary. (d) Though more educated, young people have more worldly knowledge and less Bible knowledge than 30 years ago. The influence of music and TV has been far greater than we ever imagined. Given another 30 years, how much more difficult will it be to find men qualified? (e) Some brethren don’t want an eldership. The brother who can’t or won’t qualify himself won’t have as much say-so with an eldership as he did when decisions were made in business meetings. So he may find every objection to having an eldership.

The church has been greatly hurt by this problem. A church is not all God wants it to be until it is scripturally organized. It is “wanting” and not “in order” (Tit.1:5).

3. Less Young People. In recent years I have held meeting at places were audiences had more gray hair and fewer young people. The young are often involved in sports, social functions, and school activities. They are not being raised with the same philosophy as many of their parents  that the kingdom of heaven comes first, even before homework (Matt. 6:33). My mother always said she would rather see me make an “F’ and be faithful to the Lord than to make an “A” and put him in second place.

While day care centers meet a need in today’s society, more children are growing up without the spiritual training needed to help them be faithful. There will soon be a whole generation who were raised by someone who spent more time with them than their parents. There could be a connection between this and the fact that there is also more child abuse and parent abuse today. A mutual affection has not been allowed to develop in many cases. I do not imply that day care centers are responsible for training our children. They are not. This is primarily the parents’ responsibility (Eph. 6:4; Col. 3:21; Prov. 22:6). Too many parents are involved in making a living while neglecting to make a life for their offspring. Nor is it the responsibility of the church. However, individual Christians who are worth their salt will take an interest in those going through this crucial time in life and help them over the road. Parents need all the help they can get.

Suggestion For Young Preachers

I prefer “suggestions,” rather than “advice,” but call it what you will.

1. The purpose of preaching is to impart knowledge and edify in view of saving souls. At times reproof and rebuke are needed. But some brethren don’t think you are preaching unless you are giving someone a good skinning every time you enter the pulpit. A preacher can “skin” an audience without imparting any knowledge or edification. Try not to get out of balance and be sure to study verses which deal with proper attitudes, such as 2 Timothy 2:24, 25.

2. Where to deal with problems. Some problems can only be dealt with from the pulpit due to their widespread nature and when false doctrine has been publicly pro-claimed. It may seem expedient to handle all problems this way rather than talk heart to heart with those involved. Generally, it is a good rule of thumb to remember that problems are better settled out of the pulpit if possible, for a couple of reasons. Those who need correcting often appreciate it more if you show them you are not trying to publicly embarrass them or win a point at all costs and are more receptive. Also, the better a problem is contained among fewer people the less potential for greater and worse con-sequences. If it can be settled over a cup of coffee, things will be better for all concerned.

3. Frequent teaching on Matthew 18:15-17, 21-35 is helpful. It is better to do this before problems develop (preventive medicine) rather than afterward. There is great reluctance to do things God’s way, though his wisdom can-not be improved upon. When charges are made, ask for the witnesses, especially if they are made against an elder (1 Tim. 5:19). Notice that the accusation is “at the mouth” of two or three witnesses, “not at the ears.” The witnesses are to corroborate the testimony, not merely listen to charges they know nothing about.

4. “Trying out.” When “trying out” at a congregation, the brethren usually have a list of questions for the preacher. It is also good for him to have a list of questions for them. It will be easier to get an agreement at this point than it will be later. Are the brethren committed to doing their part? Get it in writing, preferably in the business meeting notes. This will be best for all concerned (1 Cor. 14:40).

5. Become a part of the congregation. Try to be personally acquainted with each member. Don’t be aloof or develop an attitude of paranoia “us” versus “them.” And be yourself.

6. Don’t do one-to-one counseling with the opposite sex. Even if innocent, you can be falsely accused.

7. Avoid crude language.

8. Try not to contribute to stereotypes among brethren  unless you want all preachers to be stereotyped.

9. Read Proverbs 27:2.

Suggestions For Churches

1. Preachers who receive outside support do not usually have any kind of agreement for cost of living increases. Try to be mindful of them.

2. Most preachers who receive outside support often live from paycheck to paycheck and most of their bills come due around the first of the month. Try to get the support to them on time. Also, please be more patient with men being supported in places that rely mainly on conversions to be-come self-supporting. It takes a while to make enough conversions and lead them to a point of maturity where they have learned to financially support the work. And keep in mind the nature of those wage earners. Some congregations are made up predominantly of “blue collar” workers and the congregation may not reach the point of self-maintenance as quickly as one made up of “white collar” workers.

3. Try to be patient with the preacher and from time to time mentally put yourself in his place. It is good for congregations and preachers to have a clear understanding of what is expected of each from the very beginning.

4. When new congregations are beginning or when a struggling one is trying to get back on its feet or has been hurt by problems, try not to kick it when it is down. There is a scarcity of pioneers who want to be involved with a congregation that is trying to become self-sustaining and fly on its own. For various reasons when Christians move to another city they usually unite with the larger, more established congregations. They often become a “number” whose talent is frequently buried. Sometimes it is good to “ask not what a congregation can do for me, but what can I do for a congregation that needs me.” Those in these circumstances need your help. It can be rewarding, both in this life and the next.

Conclusion

If some of these appear to be random (and often unconnected) thoughts, they are. They were written as they came to mind. There are some generalizations to which there are exceptions. I hope you kept that in mind and were charitable as you read. Thank you for considering these things.

Guardian of Truth XLI: 14 p. 8-10
July 17, 1997