Truth Magazine

By Shane Carrington

Baptism involving absolutely no water! At least that is the claim. “Dry baptism” supposedly describes the process through which people become Christians. God does teach baptism “in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38), but does this baptism include no water? Let’s examine this waterless (dry) baptism idea; what does the Scripture really teach?

The Claim: Dry Baptism Places Believers Into Christ

People portray “dry baptism” as the process the Holy Spirit uses to “place the believer in Christ.” In their terminology “dry baptism” equals “Holy Spirit baptism.” Notice the following passages and comments from “dry baptism” advocates.

For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body; whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free; and have all been made to drink into one Spirit” (1 Cor 12:13). “… we were all baptized. The Spirit joins all believers to the body of Christ (The Ryrie Study Bible New Testament 305).

“For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ” (Gal. 3:27). “. . . baptized into Christ. Not water baptism but Spirit baptism, which brings believers into a living union with Christ (cf. 1 Cor. 12:13) (Ryrie 336).

For similar comments see Ryrie on Romans 6:3, 4 (Ibid. 271); Unzer’s Bible Dictionary 496; and Word Studies In The Greek New Testament, Treasures of The Greek New Testament 3:86-88, by Kenneth Wuest.

Baptism In Jesus’ Name: The Truth!

What does the Bible really say about baptism in Jesus’ name? “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age. Amen” (Matt. 28:18-20). People baptize people. The Holy Spirit was not commissioned to baptize people. Note this:

1. Jesus commanded disciples to baptize people “in the name” of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:18-20; Mark 16:15, 16).

2. But the baptism of the great commission “in the name” of God is water baptism (Acts 10:47, 48).

3. Therefore the baptism Jesus commanded is “water baptism” not Holy Spirit baptism.

Water Baptism in Jesus’ Name

More proof? When disciples began carrying out the great commission, what did they do?

Philip “preached Jesus” to the eunuch (Acts 8:35). “Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, `See. here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?’ So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him. Now when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught Philip away, so that the eunuch saw him no more; and he went on his way rejoicing” (Acts 8:36-39). You cannot miss the water in this passage!

After teaching Cornelius and his family, Peter said: “`Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?’ And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord” (Acts 10:47, 48). They had already received the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:44-48; 11:15-17). After they received the Holy Spirit, Peter commanded them to be baptized in water! Peter would not “forbid water” (Acts 10:47); he “commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord” (Acts 10:48). Therefore when disciples “baptized in the name of the Lord” they were baptizing people in water” not the Holy Spirit.

The above passages prove Jesus’ disciples practiced water baptism “in the name of the Lord” (Acts 10:47, 48), not Holy Spirit baptism. Take note:

1. Baptism “in the name of the Lord” is water baptism (Acts 10:47, 48).

2. Baptism in the name of Jesus is “for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38). Peter said, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:38).

3. Therefore water baptism, not Holy Spirit baptism, is “for the remission of sins.”

When people with the right disposition of heart  faith and repentance  are baptized in water, they become Christians. “And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22:16).

Two Baptisms Today?

Most who believe that non-miraculous Holy Spirit baptism “places people into Christ” also believe water baptism plays a part in God’s scheme. Sometimes they use the same passage to discuss both water and Holy Spirit baptism (Ryrie Study Bible New Testament 271). However they must choose one or the other. “There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Eph. 4:4-6). We have no more scriptural foundation for two baptisms than for two Gods, Lords, or faiths. In the past, God employed several baptisms. By the time Paul wrote Ephesians, there was only one. What is the one baptism of Ephesians 4:5? Water baptism!

Reasons:

1. It was for all people (Matt. 28:19, 20; Mark 16:15, 16).

2. It was for all time (Matt. 28:18-20).

3. It is unto salvation (Mark 16:15, 16; Acts 22:16).

Reasons Holy Spirit Baptism is Not the

“One Baptism”

1. It was miraculous, with evidence of speaking in tongues (Acts 1:5-8; 2:1-4, 14-21). Miraculous power in men would not last throughout human history (1 Cor. 13:8-13). Water baptism was a continuing provision (Matt. 28:18-20; Mark 16:15, 16). Therefore Holy Spirit baptism is not the “one.”

2. We possess only two possible recorded occurrences of Holy Spirit baptism (Acts 1:5-8 with 2:1-4; 10:44-48 with 11:15-17). God never promised Holy Spirit baptism for all people! Peter appealed to “the beginning” (Pentecost, Acts 2) to find another occurrence (Acts 11:15-17). Holy Spirit baptism happened seldom, while water baptism occurred often (survey the book of Acts).

3. God baptized the apostles with the Holy Spirit to guide them into all truth and give them power to prove they were preachers from God (Acts 1:5-8; John 16:13; Acts 2:1-43). The Holy Spirit came upon Cornelius and his family to convince Peter and the rest of the brethren that God was willing to accept Gentiles (Acts 10-11:18). No passage suggests God made Holy Spirit baptism necessary to salvation! Water baptism places people into Christ (Rom. 6:3, 4; Gal. 3:26, 27)!

What About 1 Corinthians 12:13?

Some think they have strong evidence for “dry baptism” from 1 Corinthians 12:13 (cf., the works cited earlier). They interpret other passages in light of this one: “For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body; whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free; and have all been made to drink into one Spirit” (1 Cor. 12:13). But this does not teach Holy Spirit baptism.

Notice several reasons:

1. It says baptized “by” the Spirit, not “in” (in spite of what some translations say). “By” comes from the Greek word, en, which has several possible meanings: “in, on, at, with, by, among” (The New Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon 209). Since multiple possibilities exist, we must determine its meaning by the context. In 1 Corinthians “by (en) the Spirit” means the Holy Spirit is the source: of spiritual cleansing (1 Cor. 6:11), information (1 Cor. 12:3), and power (1 Cor. 12:9). Therefore, “baptized by the Spirit” means the Holy Spirit is our source of information concerning baptism  not the element into which we are baptized! The Holy Spirit is the baptizer here, not the element into which people must be baptized!

2. Only Jesus baptized people in the Holy Spirit (Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:7, 8; Luke 3:15, 16; John 1:25-34). Yet the Holy Spirit  through the word (Eph. 5:26)  teaches people the baptism of 1 Corinthians 12:13. So the Holy Spirit baptizes us in the sense that he revealed God’s instructions about baptism.

3. Jesus baptized people in water, yet not personally. “Therefore, when the Lord knew that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John (though Jesus Himself did not baptize, but His disciples)” (John 4:1, 2). Jesus taught; others baptized. Similarly, the Holy Spirit teaches us water baptism via the word (John 16:13; Acts 2:38; Eph. 6:17), while humans baptize us in water. No one is scripturally baptized otherwise, for the Holy Spirit revealed the Scriptures! Jesus “made and baptized more disciples than John” (John 4:1, 2)  though not personally. Similarly the Holy Spirit baptizes us  though not personally  in the sense that his word (the gospel) teaches us to be baptized.

Conclusion

Baptism is necessary to salvation  water baptism, that is! Holy Spirit baptism was temporary, ending before the first century closed. Holy Spirit baptism never directly saved anyone! But we must preach and practice water baptism unto salvation  until the Lord returns. “And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, `All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.’ Amen” (Matt. 28:18-20). And this is immersion in water  nothing “dry” about it!

Guardian of Truth XLI: 23 p. 14-16
December 4, 1997

By Johnie Edwards

The Bible often refers to the Lord’s people by the term “fellow,” including the preacher! Instead of thinking of the preacher as the hire of the church, we need to think of the gospel preacher as a Bible fellow.

Fellow Citizens

Paul referred to Christians at Ephesus as fellow citizens. “Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God” (Eph. 2:19). There was a time when the Gentiles had been aliens from the body of Christ, but they now possessed citizenship and family membership in the New Testament church. Every Christian is a citizen in the kingdom of God when he obeys the gospel (Col. 1:13). By the way some act toward the preacher, you would think that he, although a member of God’s family, is not a fellow citizen!

Fellow Workers

In writing the Colossians, Paul named three Jewish Christians as being his fellow workers as he said, “. . . These only are my fellow workers unto the kingdom of God, which have been a comfort unto me” (Col. 4:11). Paul said of Onesimus, “. . . a faithful and beloved brother, who is one of you” (Col. 4:9). I sure wish more brethren thought of the gospel preacher like this! Preachers and other members are working together for a common cause  the spread of the gospel.

Fellow Helpers

Paul did not look upon the young gospel preacher, Titus as a hire of the church, but rather as, “. . . my partner and fellow helper concerning you . . . they are messengers of the churches, and the glory of Christ” (2 Cor. 8:23). Preachers and other members of the church are partners (Phile. 17), and fellow helpers in the work of the Lord.

Fellow Servants

All Christians are fellow servants. The Holy Spirit refers to the gospel preacher, Epaphras, as “. . . our dear fellow servant, who is for you a faithful minister of Christ” (Col. 1:7). Please notice how Paul refers to a gospel preacher.” All my state shall Tychicus declare unto you, who is a beloved brother, and a faithful minister and fellow servant in the Lord” (Col. 4:7). Instead of referring to the preacher as a hired-hand, why not refer to him like the Lord said  a beloved brother, a faithful minister and a fellow servant?

Fellow Soldiers

It is penned concerning Epaphroditus, “Yet I supposed it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother, and companion in labor, and fellow soldier, but your messenger, and he that ministered to my wants” (Phil. 2:25). Paul thought of this preacher as a companion, fellow soldier and his brother in the labor they were engaged in. What a refreshing way to refer to the gospel preacher! As the letter to Philemon was being written, Apphia and Archippus were referred to as, “. . . our beloved, our fellow soldier” (Phile. 2).

Fellow Heirs

God’s children, including preachers, are fellow heirs when faithful to serve God. Paul encourages Gentile Christians by stating that they, “. . . should be fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel” (Eph. 3:6). Remember Paul said, “And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ …” (Rom. 8:17).

It is past time that we begin to think of gospel preachers the way the Lord thinks of them and quit calling faithful gospel preachers, a professional hireling, a manipulator of the innocent, a cancer in the body, obstructer of spiritual growth, proxy for others, a paid functionary, the professional sermonizer, and the like. If a gospel preacher is any of these, he should stop being such immediately.

Guardian of Truth XLI: 23 p. 20
December 4, 1997

By Gene Ramsay

One in three American girls and one in seven boys will be sexually molested by age 18. Children ages ten and younger are frequently “well versed” on sexual matters. More children contract sexually transmitted diseases each year than all the victims of polio in its eleven-year epidemic from 1942-1953. An average serial child molester has between 360-380 victims in his lifetime. Twenty-two percent of boys and 23% of girls who are sexually abused are abused before age eight. As you read this listing, let me mention that this is only the beginning. Your next question may be, “What do all these things have in common?” The above is a sampling of some facts and statistics which are closely tied to pornography.

Now that I have your attention, let me shock you with some more facts and figures: A primary consumer group of pornography is adolescent boys 12-17 years of age (this in and of itself is illegal). There are now more hard-core pornography outlets in America than there are McDonald’s Restaurants. Eighty-six percent of convicted rapists admit regular pornography use. Fifty-seven percent of convicted rapists admit actually imitating pornography scenes in the commission of their crimes. The list could continue, but I am sure that you get the point. Pornography is the prime cause of many problems today, and the alarming fact is that it is free everywhere!

That’s right, Satan has it covered from video games to TV, music, magazines, telephones, and nowadays  computers. Now, don’t get me wrong, I am not blaming the actual components. I will, however, offer this question, “Who is watching and/or listening to it?” We are all, in some form or another, exposed to varying degrees of pornography. Some people, sadly, seek it out to get their “fix,” and Christians are not immune. Anyone can become desensitized to the various forms pornography takes if he allows himself to. The temptation is there all the time, and especially if they have a computer and can “surf the net.”

This brings me to some more important facts and figures: There are computer bulletin boards setup especially for the seduction of children. (They lure kids in with games and establish relationships with them online. Then they arrange to meet face-to-face.) Child molesters are using the electronic highway to look for victims. There are currently over 1,000 computer bulletin board services which offer pornography in the U.S. (This means that the number of actual accessible web sites is in the multiple thousands.)

Please keep in mind that “cyber porn” is not just a danger to children. Teenagers have given information (name, address, phone number) “online.” Some people seem to be oblivious to the obvious dangers. Even adults are making their trips to the pornographic web sites that are in such abundance on their computers.

Excuse #1: “But it is in the privacy of my own home.” True, but every web site keeps track of its visitors through a counter. If you have ever visited a web site, even for a moment, it has a record of your visit on their counter. You are now part of a “number” of people who have either “stumbled into” (Yea, right) or purposely entered that web site.

Excuse #2: “I didn’t know that the site was porno-graphic in nature.” Wrong again. Those web sites that have any amount of nudity on them must post a warning that checks to see if you are 18 or not. This sounds good, but it is merely the click of a button on yes and you’re in. Computers don’t lie, people do.

I could go on, but just thinking of all the excuses that can be used to justify actions like this makes me sick. Let’s put some of this into biblical perspective (the only perspective we should have). God made us all in his image (Gen. 1:27), but sex has been misused and abused (Rom. 1:24-25). Pornography attacks the dignity of men and women created in the image of God. It also distorts God’s gift of sex, which should only be expressed in the bonds of marriage (1 Cor. 7:2-3). The practices that result from pornography are condemned including things such as exposure (Gen. 9:21-23), adultery (Lev. 18:20; 20:10), bestiality (Lev.18:23), homosexuality (Lev. 18:22; 20:13), incest (Lev. 18:6-18), and prostitution (Deut. 23:17-18). The Bible warns against the misuse of sex. Premarital and extramarital sex is condemned (1 Con 6:13-18; 1 Thess. 4:3). Even thoughts of sexual immorality (often fed by porno-graphic material) are condemned (Matt. 5:27-28).

Parents, monitor your children and their use of “online services.” Know more about your computer than they do so you can set restrictions you feel are necessary. Try keeping the computer in a “main room” in the house and explain to them the dangers of online “chat.” The “chat” lines on computers allow anyone to be anybody they want to be. This option is thrilling to child molesters and anyone wishing to exploit someone else.

Teenagers, never give vital information over your computer. Names, addresses, and phone numbers are great tools for “cyber-sickos” to find innocent young people. My ad-vice would be to stay out of “chat” spots all together unless you are speaking with someone you know (and even that can be dangerous).

Husbands and wives, far too many marriages have been destroyed because of meeting someone “online.” Discussions can turn sexual in nature at the push of a button. Face-to-face meetings are arranged and suddenly fantasy turns to reality. Warning signs are written all over this use of the computer. Christian beware! If you need to rekindle your love for your spouse, there are better ways (Prov. 5:15-23).

What else can we do? We must keep pure by fleeing immorality (1 Cor. 6:18) and by thinking on those things that are pure (Phil. 4:8). Proverbs 23:7 says, “As a man thinks in his heart, so is he.” We cannot make any provision for the flesh (Rom. 13:14), and we must “abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul” (1 Pet. 2:11).

Pornography is an $8 billion-a-year business. Pornography ruins families, degrades people, is offensive, promotes destructive fantasy, is addictive, damages children, is linked with corruption, triggers sexual assault, and destroys God’s creation. These things anger me because they are sin. So, in the words of a Captain who has continually been faced with adversity from an unrelenting enemy, “The line must be drawn here!”

Guardian of Truth XLI: 22 p. 5-6
November 20, 1997

By Steve Curtis

Information contained in this article is taken from “Mother Theresa’s Sainthood Not Automatic,” written by Philip Pullella (Reuters via Internet, Sept. 6, 1997). Since the death of Mother Theresa, several things have been writ-ten and said about her sainthood. Those who loved her want to pressure the Catholic church to elevate her to sainthood immediately. However, being recognized as a saint by the Catholic church is no automatic thing.

If most people got their way, sainthood for Mother Theresa would be automatic. People already considered her to be a “living saint” and “Saint of the Gutters.” So, why not just go ahead and say she is a saint? The Catholic church will not let Mother Theresa be called a saint until she satisfies all its human doctrines and commandments. Despite the feelings and emotions of the grieving, only time (a lot of time) and the Catholic Church will tell whether Mother Theresa will be a saint.

If one ignored issues like the infallibility of the Pope, infant baptism, the doctrine of transubstantiation, etc. and just considered the issue of sainthood alone, one could easily see that the Catholic Church does not teach what the Bible teaches. Therefore, regardless of whether Mother Theresa is ever recognized as a saint or not, she will not be a saint as recognized in the word of God. Let us compare the Catholic saint with the biblical saint.

Does It Take Years and Does The Church Decide?

According to the above mentioned article, “People the world over considered Mother Theresa of Calcutta a ‘living saint’ but `years or decades may pass before the Roman Catholic Church can elevate her to sainthood.’ Where in the Bible can one read that it takes years or decades before a person can become a saint? In Ephesians 1:1, Paul ad-dressed the “saints who are in Ephesus.” What process taking years or decades did the Ephesians go through before Paul recognized them as saints?

Furthermore, where does the Bible say that in order to be a saint the Catholic Church must elevate you to that position? In the first place, the Catholic church cannot be found in the Bible. In the second place, the New Testament church never elevated anyone to sainthood. The New Testament church was made up of those who were saints (1 Cor. 1:2).

Why does the world allow such to go unchallenged? If a gospel preacher was to state that Mother Theresa is not a saint because she was not a member of the New Testament church, he would be booed and hissed. Unfortunately, some of his own brethren would be in that number. Yet, the Catholic Church can declare that sainthood is a process that takes years, at the end of which the church will decide the outcome, and people think nothing of it.

Does Death Precede Becoming A Saint?

The next statement in the article is this. “Despite a person’s reputation during his or her life, the process that leads to saint-hood cannot begin until after death.” Read

Ephesians 1:1. Paul addressed his letter to “the saints who are in Ephesus.” He did not write to “the saints buried in Ephesus.” If one accepts the Catholic doctrine of sainthood, he must necessarily accept the fact that Paul wrote to a group of dead people in Ephesus.

What would be the purpose of writing to a group of dead people instructing them in the way of the Lord? Exactly how would the dead saints at Ephesus “walk worthy of the calling” (Eph. 4:1)? In what way could the dead at Ephesus have “fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness” (Eph. 5:11)? It is clear that the Bible’s concept and the Catholic Church’s concept of a saint are not the same. This is not hardheartedness or sarcasm. Friends, the obvious truth is the Catholic Church, its doctrine, and its practices, are not from God.

Miracles And Sainthood?

Now, according to the process of becoming recognized as a saint by the Catholic Church, miracles have to be attributed to the deceased. Here is the statement. “And whatever Mother Theresa did during her lifetime, two miracles after her death have to be recognized by the Church.” This is amazing! If a gospel preacher was to get up and read directly from the word of God, the very words of Jesus in Mark 16:16 without adding comment  “He that believes and is baptized shall be saved,” there would be some who would get upset, angry and make all kinds of accusations against him. “He’s preaching his opinion. He believes in water salvation. He does not believe in faith and grace.” On the other hand, a religious group can decide that in order to be a saint two miracles have to be attributed to the individual after his death, which is not even hinted at in the Bible, and no one gets upset at all.

Friends, if this was God’s will, it would be in the Bible. In 2 Peter 1:3, Peter said, “as His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue.” Peter said we have all things, not some, not a few, not a lot, but all things. If miracles were necessary to be a saint, God would have told us. Not only can we see that the Catholic Church makes it harder for a person to be a saint than God does, but we can see that Catholicism is a man-made religion.

Earning A Reputation of Sanctity?

“If a person has earned a `reputation of sanctity’ among people, the local bishop can begin the process but he must wait at least five years after the person has died.” If the Catholic Church believes what the Bible teaches, according to them, the apostle Paul did two things before penning his epistle to the “saints at Ephesus.” He considered their previous reputation and waited five years after the death of everyone at Ephesus before he referred to them as saints.

What was the reputation of the Ephesians? The Bible says it was far from “sanctity.” Before they obeyed the gospel, they were “dead in trespasses and sins” (Eph. 2:1). Even after obeying the gospel, “many who had believed came confessing and telling their deeds” of practicing magic (Acts 19:18-19). The reputation of the Ephesians was just like my reputation, your reputation, and everyone else’s. We are all sinners (Rom. 3:10, 23). Without Christ the Ephesians, like you and I, were without hope (Eph. 2:12). How were the Ephesians elevated to sainthood? Paul said it was “in one body, through the cross” (Eph. 2:16). Why did Paul not consider the minimal five year waiting period? Why did Paul not take into account the reputation of those who were once sinners? The reason why Paul did not consider these things is there was no such thing as the Pope and the Catholic church in his day. If there had been, the inspired apostle would have condemned them for such human doctrines.

The Process Of Sainthood

After waiting five years, what does this process involve according to the Catholic Church? “A `postulator’ is appointed to help gather information from people who knew the candidate, seeking evidence of holiness.” Then, “the evidence  usually amounting to many, many volumes  is sent under seal to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Causes for Saints. A `relator’ is appointed. His job is to evaluate the evidence and make a recommendation in the form of a `positio,’ or position paper.” May the gospel preacher have a strong backbone and thick skin who would dare suggest trying to find evidence of anyone’s holiness, not to mention Mother Theresa’s. Yet, the Catholic Church can look at someone like dear, Nobel prize winning Mother Theresa and question her holiness. Before they can take an official position they have to appoint special investigators and gather volumes and volumes of material. This is not found in the Bible. It just is not there.

What happens after this investigation? The article states, “If the investigation ends positively, a papal decree recognizing the person’s heroic virtues is published and the person is granted the title of `venerable.’ One miracle is required after a candidate’s death for the cause to move on to Beatification…. The candidate can then be beatified and declared a `blessed’ of the Church. This allows a limited form of veneration . . . Another miracle is needed between Beatification and Canonization, or the conferring of sainthood.” If this is in the Bible, I simply have missed it.

What if the Catholic Church’s investigation for saint-hood ends negatively? Is dear, Nobel prize winning Mother Theresa declared unholy? Will the “living saint,” “Saint of the Gutters” be lost eternally? What if she is recognized as having “heroic virtues,” but no miracles follow? An honest heart can see two things. First, the Catholic church makes it harder to be a saint than God does. So, why not just follow God’s word? Second, one can see that the Catholic Church does not teach what the Bible teaches. Once men leave the Bible, though “they draw near to God with their mouths and honor Him with their lips,” it is nothing more than vanity (Matt. 15:7-9). The end result for those who follow such man-made religions is damnation (Matt. 15:12).

What Does The Bible Teach Concerning

Becoming A Saint?

The word “saint” or “saints” appears several times in the Scriptures. Basically, the idea behind the word saint is “set apart.” To be a saint is to be “set apart for God, to be, as it were exclusively His” (Thayer).

When the Scriptures speak about saints, it speaks of those who are set apart to God (Rom. 1:7; Phil. 1:1; 1 Cor. 1:2). One is separated or set apart to God when he is called by the gospel. God calls men today through the gospel (2 Thess. 2:13-14; 2 Tim. 1:9-10). One does not become a saint through Catholicism.

In Acts 8:1, a great persecution arose against the church which was at Jerusalem. In Acts 9:13, Ananias was afraid to go to Saul because he had persecuted and done much harm to the saints in Jerusalem. Therefore, to speak of saints is to speak of the church, to speak of the church is to speak of the saints. The conclusion is whatever is necessary for one to be a member of the church is that which is necessary to be a saint. From Acts 2, we know that this is obedience to the gospel. Those who have obeyed the gospel call (hear, believe, repent, confess, and are baptized for the remission of sins) are saved and added to the church (Acts 2:38, 41, 47). Therefore, the saved are the saints, the church.

If the Catholic Church ever elevates Mother Theresa to sainthood, it would not mean that she is a saint in view of what the Bible teaches. If Mother Theresa was not a saint before her death, it is too late now. Death has robbed her of that opportunity regardless of feelings, human judgments, or the Catholic church. On the day of judgment, it will only matter if one is a saint according to the Bible definition. In view of your own mortality, have you obeyed the gospel call? Are you a saint, set apart to God?

Guardian of Truth XLI: 23 p. 7-8
December 4, 1997