Truth Magazine

Ron Halbrook

[The following article is taken verbatim from my letter dated February 27, 1993 in answer to a letter from brother J.T. Smith dated February 17, 1993. His letter asked if I would affirm the proposition stated below. He wrote because he had heard I would "answer in the affirmative" if the question was raised when I preached on marriage, though he did not identify the source of the report. Since I have known brother Smith from my childhood days, my letter began with some unrelated news and some remarks expressing my personal gratitude for his help through the years. That part of the letter is omitted below, along with a brief closing paragraph.]

Continue reading “Halbrook’s Answers to Smith’s Question in 1993”

Ron Halbrook

I want to thank brother J.T. Smith for the opportunity to make this statement regarding his March 2001 editorial in Gospel Truths as I am preparing to leave for six weeks in the Philippines. He is concerned about our critics charging us with hypocrisy in opposing their unity-in-doctrinal-diversity while we differ among ourselves in some ways. This charge is directed at brother Donnie Rader, myself, and other faithful men such as brother Smith. "Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse" us (Acts 24:13).

Continue reading “Why Halbrook Fellowships Smith, Rader, and Other Faithful Men in Spite of Some Differences”

Harry Osborne

The following article was written by brother Earl Kimbrough and originally appeared in the bulletin of the East Bay Church of Christ in Sun City Center, Florida. Its presence on this web site should not be seen as an endorsement of the teaching. Neither should it be implied that brother Kimbrough’s stated thoughts on dealing with those in unlawful marriages is encouraged by this author. In fact, this author finds that the view which "makes sense" to brother Kimbrough is a view which conflicts with New Testament principles.

Continue reading “Dealing With Marriage And Divorce by Earl Kimbrough”

Donnie V. Rader

The reference I make in my printed lecture to Earl Kimbrough was,

When a man teaches that one who has no right to remarry can remarry, his teaching leads his hearer to commit adultery. Most agree that we can’t fellowship the man who is in adultery. However, we are told we can fellowship the man who teaches him that it is scriptural (See: Harrell, Homer Hailey 6; Bounds ; Owen, Dawson, Kimbrough).

Continue reading “A Reply To Earl Kimbrough”