Truth Magazine

By Leslie Diestelkamp

A few years ago when some denominational missionaries were murdered in the Belgian Congo some brethren seemed to rejoice that no members of the Lord’s church died in that African land. But I didn’t rejoice! I was ashamed! I realized that there were no brethren in Christ there to live or to die! And, though the Congo is completely at peace now, and though a Christian is probably safer there than he would be in New York or Chicago or Miami, I think it is still true that there are none in the Congo who truly follow Christ. What about that?

Most Christians are aware of the abundant harvest that has been produced by the gospel in Nigeria in the last 25 years. Perhaps well over 100,000 souls have been immersed into Christ and even much over half that many remain there, alive and working, after surviving the civil war in that country. But, though we have gone into almost all of the English and Spanish speaking countries with the gospel, we have neglected the French speaking nations. Dahomy is one of those countries. It lies next-door to Nigeria. Ivory Coast is not far away and is a large, progressive country. There are a dozen others nearby plus many in other parts of the world that are virtually untouched by the pure gospel. Surely there are some preachers who speak French or who will learn it, and who will respond to this challenge. There is no reason to suppose the harvest would be significantly less in the French-speaking countries than it has been in fruitful Nigeria. Who will go?

But world evangelism also, includes many bard and barren fields of labor right here in our own land. This we must do and not leave the other undone. In other words, we have the men and the money; the gospel is God’s power to save all who believe; we ought to go everywhere preaching Christ in this generation. This is not I just a visionary dream. It is a New Testament directive. And this battle for souls is not ours, it is the Lord’s. But we are his soldiers! In fact, the Lord has no hands except the hands of Christians with which to reach out in helpfulness to all. He has no lips except the lips of his own people with which to bring the saving message to lost humanity everywhere. He has no feet except the feet of living saints with which to go here and to go there and to go everywhere with the pure gospel. And he has no money except that which the Christians give to support the willing and faithful men who go into the four corners of the earth.

What will you, dear reader, do about this? Will you go? Will you help others to go? And what will the church do where you regularly worship? Actually, you know the church only has one use for money and that is to spend it! If you have a church savings account, unless it is for a specified purpose and a very limited time, you should realize that such money is being wasted. Indeed, the church is neither a money-collecting nor a money-saving body, but when Christians give, the church then becomes a money-spending body. And souls are dependent upon us. Some will die today who could not be saved. What of tomorrow? Will we help others to have a chance?

TRUTH MAGAZINE, XVI: 20, p. 6
March 23, 1972

By Cecil Willis

Some of our brethren act rather strangely regarding the subject of fellowship. Brethren’s concepts of fellowship have undergone some unusual evolution. In Luke 5:26 the miracles that Jesus performed are referred to as “strange things” (from the Greek word paradoxa). His miracles appeared to be contrary to fact. A paradox is something that seems contradictory. Some of our brethren have a very contradictory position regarding fellowship.

There is a little country congregation just a few miles from my home that is well over one hundred years old. In fact, the congregation was established in 1836. I have read their business meeting notes all the way back to their beginning. In years gone by, this congregation has been associated with the Daniel Sommer sentiment. They have objected to full-time local preachers, and have never had one, though they have continued to have regular appointment preachers throughout the years.

In recent years, they have taken a more favorable attitude toward those of us who oppose the church support of human institutions. Probably this has been partially out, of necessity. There are very few of the old-time Sommer — type preachers left. A little over ten years ago, this congregation first asked me to conduct a gospel meeting for it. I have since held about three other meetings there. When I was first invited, the elders told me, “We do not care where you learned to preach; we are only concerned with whether you can preach.” Apparently they thought that when I came for a gospel meeting, I would feed them a dose of the college issue each night.

Throughout the past forty years or so, this congregation has meticulously kept to itself. They had a “failing out” of some sort with the old-time Sommer-type preachers. I think

I was invited to hold them a meeting because they considered me to be the lesser of two evils, when compared to institutional preachers, though they also have had meetings held by a few liberals. Sometime they have not been very discriminating in the kind of preachers they had for meetings. Some would consider they were not very discriminating when they invited me!

A few months ago, this congregation had Ed Matthews, a graduate student in “Missions” from Abilene Christian College, to hold them a gospel meeting. I was not at home, and hence did not get to hear the lessons first hand. They asked Brother Matthews to speak each night on “Legalism and the Law,” whatever that was intended to mean. In f act, they asked me to hold the meeting and to speak on the same theme. I turned them down, stating that I had spent too much time trying to teach brethren carefully to follow the “law of Christ” now to speak several nights minimizing gospel law keeping. This subject was right down Brother Matthews’ line.

Brother Matthews began the meeting by using some historical material to show that some brethren had always thought of the church as being comprised of the good people out of all denominations. He made a featured point out of Alexander Campbell’s famous Lunnenburg letter. These nearby brethren have arrogantly thought of themselves as super Bible students because they did not need a full-time preacher. The truth of the matter is they were so ignorant that they were gullible to error. When one came teaching palpable error, apparently not one person in the congregation recognized it as error.

In the course of the gospel meeting, Brother Matthews several different times stated that instrumental music should not have been made a test of fellowship, and that he could fellowship those in the Christian Church who used instrumental music in their worship. Rather than reprimanding this false teacher, the elders of this nearby church publicly commended him. Apparently they had not so exercised their spiritual senses so as to discern good from evil.

Brother Norman Midgette preaches for one of the churches here in Marion. Brother Steve Wolfgang then preached for the other faithful church here in Marion. The nearby church had announced there would be a question period following the lessons presented by Brother Matthews. After about one session of questioning by Brother Midgette, and later by Brother Wolfgang, these brethren decided to discontinue their question period. In fact, they rather rudely told Brother Midgette that if he came back, he was to keep his mouth shut.They gave the same order to several other brethren who were chagrined at the blatant error taught there.

Brother Matthews taught the “fellowship-everybody” (meaning every baptized believer) position now being popularized by Brother Carl Ketcherside and Leroy Garrett. When I returned home and requested permission to listen to the tape recordings of Brother Matthews’ lessons, I was adamantly forbidden to do so. One of the elders told me that Brother Matthews preached precisely what they wanted him to preach.

Since these brethren publicly endorsed the “fellowship-everybody” position, you would have thought they would at least have been charitable toward their brethren who disagreed with them. But not so. These brethren now will not attend our services at all. During our most recent gospel meeting, only two or three ladies from that congregation attended our services, and they came only a night or two. Yet for several years these brethren have professed to agree with us, and heretofore have been most cordial.

It is very strange, yea very paradoxical, that these brethren will publicly endorse the statement that we should fellowship those in the Christian Church, but yet they will not fellowship those of us in the church of Christ. Another of the Ketcherside-type churches nearby publicly taught that those in the Christian Church should be fellowshiped, until about fifty members from the church joined the Christian Church. Then the brethren there became upset. I fail to see why they were upset, since the departing brethren merely put into practice what they had been taught for several years. In fact, these brethren became so upset they even asked me to come and talk to them. When I walked into their church building, I picked up one of every tract they hid on display. Not one of the fourteen or go tracts on display had been written by anyone even remotely connected with the Lord’s church. Every single tract had been written by some denominationalist and distributed by a denominational tract society. Yet these brethren pretended to be unable to see why brethren would leave the Lord’s church to join a denomination.

It is very strange how these misguided brethren can so strongly contend that every baptized believer should be fellowshipped (even those in denominations), but then they treat us who really are their brethren as though we had the plague. It reminds me of some of the capers of the Ohio Valley College brethren. They pretend to be strongly opposed to church support of colleges, but then load their lecture programs with brethren who advocate this which they affect to believe to be serious error. Meanwhile, they refuse to use any of us with whom they pretend to be in agreement on the church-supported college issue. Indeed, some of our brethren do have a paradoxical fellowship!

TRUTH MAGAZINE, XVI: 20, pp. 3-5
March 23, 1972

By Luther Blackmon

The devil is not stupid. He is like the chameleon. He changes his color to match his surroundings. Satan knows he doesn’t have to worry about the drunkards, fornicators, murderers, etc. He has them in his clutches. But religious people present another problem. They live in a different atmosphere. So the devil “gets religion.” He “joins the church.”

I have sometimes said that denominationalism is the devil’s ablest ally. I know that a lot of people think I am wrong about that, because they simply cannot conceive of one’s being sincerely religious, and being wrong. But before you turn me off, notice some scriptures: Mt. 7:21-23: “Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my father which is in heaven. Many will say unto me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy’ name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” The rest of the chapter explains that these were not rejected because they did not build a good house. They didn’t build it where the Lord said build it! We don’t have to be wrong about everything to go to hell.

Again, in 2 Cor. 11: 13-15, Paul gives us a picture of Satan clothing himself in the “livery of heaven.” And Paul wants the Corinthians to beware lest they be deceived by him. Jesus said, “Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.” Marshall Keeble would say, “if you don’t believe that, just sit out there (in sin) ’till rootin’ time comes.”

Paul, in his speech before Agrippa, said, “I verily thought with myself that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth. Which things I also did in Jerusalem: and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death I gave my voice (his vote) against them.” Paul was the bitterest enemy of the church of Christ. But he “thought” he ought to be. God’s mercy provided for him a pardon, but his ignorance of the wrong he had done did not alter the fact that he had sinned.

Romans 5:13 says… “Sin is not imputed when there is no law.” Some think this means that if one does not know what God’s law is, he cannot violate it. But that is not what Paul said. Certainly one cannot violate a law that does not exist. But there is a difference between a situation “where there is no law,” and where there is a law which one does not know about. If God had given no laws, man could not be a transgressor. But He did give us laws, and when we violate one of these laws we become transgressors, whether we know it at the time or not. If a demented man shoots and kills his neighbor, he is a murderer, even though he may not be mentally responsible. The court may see fit to extend clemency because of his condition, but that does not alter the fact that he has broken the law.

God may be more merciful to people whose circumstances have not permitted them to know the truth, than I have any right to promise that He will be. I hope so. I am constrained to believe, from Luke 12:47-48, that there will be degrees of punishment for the transgressors. But even if this be true, it offers no solace to people who do not care to know the truth. The gospel is preached from the pulpit, the press, the radio and from door to door. He who goes to hell from here will go without a single excuse.

TRUTH MAGAZINE, XVI: 20, p. 2
March 23, 1972

By Fred Melton

If you want to see an evolutionist squirm, ask him how the termite evolved. Oh, he will have an answer all right, but you’ll have to try hard to keep a straight face when he explains it to you.

According to current evolutionary theory (it’s changed some since Darwin), “natural selection” progressing toward a higher organism is accomplished only when a chance mutation bestows upon the organism more survival ability — notwithstanding the fact that there is no such thing as a “progressive” mutation.

Now, there are to be found within God’s natural creation many partnerships that are essential to the immediate life of both plant and animal involved in this union. Typical of such interdependent systems is the lowly termite, order — Isoptera. The main problem appears to be the fact that this little creature keeps insisting on eating wood which he himself cannot digest because it contains cellulose. There is, however, a small protozoan animal which colonizes the termite’s stomach that dearly loves to digest wood.

While the Christian is ridiculed for believing in God, who is the designer and prime mover of all causes (including termites and protozoan), the evolutionists, without so much as raising an eyebrow, ask the world to believe that these little insects suffered a mutation which made them want to eat wood they cannot digest. At precisely the same time their bodies, by mutation, became adjusted to enable them to maintain numerous colonies of protozoan in their stomachs while again at that precise time, a mutation chanced to occur in the protozoan which enabled them to live in the stomach of the termite “after which both termite and protozoan lived happily ever after.”

It will not help to say that they evolved together for as typical of all such systems, they will not operate except in a perfected state.

Truly, it may be said that the evolutionist lives by faith alone.

TRUTH MAGAZINE, XVI: 19, p. 12
March 16, 1972