Speaking Smooth About . . . The Holy Spirit

By Aude McKee

I commend brother Edwards for his selection of topics to be discussed under the above heading. Everyone is vital to the purity of the Lord’s body and everyone is under attack, not only by the religious world in general, but by some of our own brethren. Fifty years ago it would have been unnecessary to discuss most of the subjects given consideration in this issue, so far as our brethren were concerned, but times have changed! Several of the fourteen subjects are of special significance because of their broad, encompassing effect. This is certainly true regarding the Holy Spirit. The “smooth things” you hear today regarding the Spirit and his work result in a minimizing of the power of the gospel of Christ.

In a volume entitled The Christian Minister’s Encyclopedia and Pulpit Companion I ran across this observation: “It seems unaccountable that intelligent beings should become so foolishly infatuated, that they should prefer deceit to sincerity, and falsehood to truth. And yet men do so, not in reference to temporal things, which are only of secondary moment; but in reference to the soul and the great realities of the eternal world. The more important the subject, and the more valuable is the truth relating to it; and the more needful to avoid error. So that to be willingly deceived in the highest of all concerns amounts to nothing short of moral insanity. Yet of this worst form of madness, men are most extensively guilty” (Sermon No. 15, Isa. 30:10, 559).

Some of the “smooth things” about the Holy Spirit that you hear today from some of our brethren:

  • Don’t get hung up on word for word inspiration.
  • The word is not the sole influence leading to conversion.
  • The prophecy found in Joel 2:28- 32 is being fulfilled now.
  • The Spirit is working mightily among our denominational neighbors.
  • The Holy Spirit personally in- dwells the Christian.

In Hendersonville, Tennessee there is a group that identifies themselves as The Community Church of Christ. In less than ten years, at least nine people have left the Lakeview church and joined Community. The ones who left and went to Community, while I preached at Lakeview, were continually complaining about the preaching. “You are not giving us what we need. We need more preaching on love. We need more inspirational sermons.” And what has happened in Hendersonville is occurring all over the country. The teaching that the people at Community want and get is a concrete example of all the five points made above. On April 1, 1995, they had this recorded telephone message: “Hey, you’ve got the Youth Message and Prayer Line. Can you imagine what the Lord is doing? It is mighty and powerful, isn’t it? ‘It shall come to pass in the last days, saith the Lord, I will pour out My Spirit on all people: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy’ (Acts 2:16-17). Pray for an outpouring of the Holy Spirit in your home and in your school. God is doing mighty things right now. Don’t let any part of your life be left out.”

In 1 Corinthians 2, Paul forever set- tles the matter of the verbal inspiration of the Scriptures. The revelation was made, he affirms, “not in words which man’s wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual” (KJV). The NIV translates the passage: “We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us. This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words” (vv. 12, 13).

If it takes more than God’s word to convert the sinner, it is strange that the Holy Spirit had Paul to write: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise. So as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also. For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith” (Rom. 1:14-17). All of us remember well the commission of Jesus: “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned” (Mark 16:15-16). The gospel is the word-for- word revelation made by the Spirit and when a person is led by the gospel, he is being led by the Spirit (Rom. 8:14).

The affirmation that Joel 2:28-32 is being fulfilled now is ludicrous (“Laughable or hilarious through obvious absurdity or incongruity,” New American Heritage Dictionary). Can those who make such a claim speak in tongues (languages they have not learned)? Can they prophesy (speak by the Holy Spirit’s inspiration)?

Any time respect for the author- ity of the Spirit-inspired Scriptures diminishes, regard for religious institutions unauthorized by God increases. Several illustrations of this point could be made from the Nashville area, but we will continue with Community. On October 29, 1993, this item appeared in the Hendersonville Star News. “For the first time in Sumner County history, churches are combining their youth for an evening of celebration. This is historic be- cause it involves Baptist, Methodist, Catholic, Assembly of God, Church of Christ, Interdenominational, and Nazarene churches. The event will be Sunday, Nov. 7, at 7:30 p.m. at Music Village.” And then the list of denominations participating are listed and among them is the Community Church of Christ. The Holy Spirit says that “whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God” (2 John 9-11). He then went on to say that anyone who bids God speed to such is a partaker of his evil deeds!

Finally, teaching that the Holy Spirit indwells the child of God personally has the potential for great harm to the cause for which Jesus died. In a sermon delivered at Highland in Abilene, Mike Cope asked, “But what are you going to do with the many wonderful Spirit-filled, Jesus-like prayerful believers who don’t go to church where we go, who weren’t baptized the same way we were baptized, and whose doctrine doesn’t line up exactly like ours? This was the crisis for me” (The Spiritual Sword, Vol. 29, No.2). Brother Cope’s “crisis” exists because he believes the Spirit can fill (indwell) a person separate from the word. It is a fact that deity indwells God’s people.

1 John 4:12-16 teaches plainly that God dwells in the Christian, Romans 8:10 affirms that Christ indwells, and 1 Corinthians 6:19 tells us that the Spirit is in the Christian. But Ephesians 3:17 makes it clear how Jesus indwells — it is through faith. Note verses 14-19:

For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named, that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with might by His Spirit in the inner man; that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith; that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, may be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; and to be able to know the love of Christ, which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God.”

The heart of man is the abode of God, his Son, and the Holy Spirit and this condition of heart is brought about by the power of God’s word. Some claim that the Spirit indwells personally, but does nothing as a result of that indwelling. One difficulty with that position (in addition to it being unscriptural) is its potential for harm. I tell my little boy that a butterfly is in his stomach but not to worry be- cause it is dormant — it does nothing. Time passes and then one day he has a queer feeling and the result? “Dad was wrong! That butterfly is doing something to me.” I attended a meeting at one of the churches of Christ in Murray, Kentucky a number of years ago, and the preacher affirmed that he had been guided to a parking place on one occasion by the Spirit and at another time was directed to a hospital room where an opportunity to teach was afforded. The indwelling Spirit, he believed, was acting supernaturally on his behalf.

When we read Isaiah 30:10, we need to remember that it was the people of God who wanted God’s message watered down. Someone wrote some years ago that “this generation has been indoctrinated, brainwashed, and conditioned to react against ‘war,’ ‘defense,’ ‘militancy,’ ‘contention,’ and other such words with contempt. To this group the con- notations which these words conjure up are repulsive and abhorrent by their very nature. In contradistinction, such words as ‘love,’ ‘peace,’ ‘harmony,’ ‘unity,’ ‘brotherhood,’ etc., are pleasing to their ears and essential elements of their vocabulary.” These are the kind of people in the church who are crying the same words that Isaiah heard about 700 years before our Lord was born — “Speak unto us smooth things.

Speaking Smooth Things About . . . Bible Baptism

By John Isaac Edwards

History repeats itself! The children of Israel cried out to the prophets, “speak unto us smooth things” (Isa. 30:10) and Jeremiah declared, “The prophets prophesy falsely. . . . and my people love to have it so” (Jer. 5:31). What happened then is going on today!

The time has come “when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall heap to them- selves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables” (2 Tim. 4:3-4). Many today “by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple” (Rom. 16:18).

We must always demand the truth, no matter what, and we need men among us who have the courage and the conviction to preach the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth no matter what! Paul penned, “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine” (2 Tim. 4:2).

Some Baptism Smoothies

There are a lot of smooth things being said today in regards to Bible baptism. Logan Fox, a Pepperdine professor, said, “It is possible to be filled with the Spirit without being baptized.” In his book, The Peaceable Kingdom, Carroll D. Osburn wrote, “There should be room in the Christian fellowship for those who believe that Christ is the Son of God, but who differ on . . . whether baptism is ‘for’ or ‘because of’ the remission of sins.” How much smoother can one get than this? This man is Professor of New Testament at Abilene Christian University. No telling how many young preachers are being affected by this smooth doctrine!

Max Lucado, who preaches for the Oak Hills church of Christ in San Antonio, Texas, said in a television inter- view in Nashville, Tennessee, July 2, 1997: “I believe in baptism. Jesus was baptized. The Bible teaches baptism. I just don’t believe that baptism saves you. I believe that Jesus Christ saves us. And baptism is one of those ways we celebrate our salvation. It’s really the initial step of the faithful believer.” In a radio broadcast, When Your Heart Needs A Father, KJAK, Lubbock, Texas, Lucado encouraged his listeners who were in need of salvation to pray a “sinner’s prayer” asking God to receive them as his child. Lucado then said, “Today is the first day you’ve ever prayed a prayer like that. Could you do me a favor? Could you write me a letter? I don’t have anything I am going to ask from you. I do have a letter I would like to send to you; I’d like to give you a word about the next step or two. I want to encourage you to be baptized, I want to encourage you to read your Bible. But I don’t want you to do any of that so that you will be saved. I want you to do all of that because you are saved . . .” Pretty smooth, don’t you think? And on and on it goes!

We must always demand the truth, no matter what, and we need men among us who have the courage and the conviction to preach the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth no matter what!

The Truth About Bible Baptism

As long as there are men who come along and speak smooth things about Bible subjects, there will be a need for us to teach the truth and expose and refute error. Whatever the Bible says about baptism is the way it is, and we need to believe it and obey it! What does the Bible say?

1. Bible baptism is for the remission of sins. The apostle Peter said very plainly, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38). To say that baptism is because of the remission of sins is to teach something the Bible just does not teach! We are not baptized because our sins are already forgiven. We are baptized in order for our sins to be remitted. The language of Peter in Acts 2:38 is parallel to that of Jesus in Matthew 26:28, “For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” Did Jesus shed his blood because men had already been forgiven of their sins? No! He shed his blood to make the remission of sins possible. And, the remission of sins is not possible without Bible baptism! That is the truth! Which will you accept: the truth or a smoothie?

2. Bible baptism saves. Some will tell us, “I don’t believe that baptism saves.” Why not? The Lord said that baptism saves. “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned” (Mark 16:16). The word “and” is a copulative conjunction that ties “faith” and “baptism” together. It takes both faith and baptism to save! Faith alone is not enough, as James declared, “Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only” (Jas. 2:24). If that’s not enough, listen to the apostle Peter, “The like figure whereunto baptism doth also now save us” (1 Pet. 3:21). I take my stand with the apostle Peter. What about you?

3. Bible baptism is a planting and a burial. Too many have the idea that salvation comes at the point of faith, and that baptism is something you do after you are saved as an outward showing of an inward feeling. Whatever that is, the Bible teaches otherwise. Paul taught, “Know ye not, that so many

of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death. . . . For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection” (Rom. 6:3-5). If you are made alive (saved) at the point of faith, then in baptism you are burying them alive! If not, why not?

4. Bible baptism washes away sins. Somebody may say, “Now wait a minute, I thought the blood of Christ washes away sins.” It does. John recorded, “Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood” (Rev. 1:5). The question is not, “Does the blood wash away sins?” The question is, “How does it do it?” According to John 19:34, Jesus shed his blood in his death. To contact the blood of Christ we must reach his death. This is accomplished in the watery grave of baptism, as Paul penned, “baptized into his death” (Rom. 6:3-4). The blood washes away sins as we are baptized into Christ. Until an individual submits to the Bible command to be baptized, he is yet in his sins! This is why Saul was instructed, “And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22:16). That may not be very smooth, but that is the truth and Jesus said, “Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

 

We need to take John’s advice, “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (1

John 4:1). May we be as the noble Bereans, who “searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so” (Acts

17:11).

Speaking Smooth Things About . . . Romans 14 and Fellowship

By Tom M. Roberts

The militancy and aggressiveness of the gospel of Christ is an undeniable facet of New Testament Christianity. The uniqueness and distinctiveness of Jesus as the Son of God, the church which he established, and the “one faith” that the Holy Spirit revealed allows no quarter or compromise with false Christs, counterfeit churches, and perverted gospels. A battle has been engaged between the forces of good and evil and we are involved whether we like it or not. Jesus said, “He who is not with me is against me” (Matt. 12:30). Timothy was urged by the apostle Paul (who, as much as any other disciple, exemplified militancy) to “fight the good warfare” (1 Tim. 1:18). He also instructed the Ephesian brethren to “Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand” (6:11ff).

In such a battle, there can be no fraternizing, no compromise with the enemy. The Bible is replete with examples of those who compromised: Adam and Eve, Balaam, Samson, King Saul, Judas, Demas, and many others. The Judaizing teachers wanted compromise on which gospel they accepted and were soundly rebuked by Paul (Acts 15:1ff; Gal. 1:6-9; etc.). From ancient times, advocates of “unity in diversity” (compromise) have had prominent spokespersons. The theme of this issue of Truth Magazine reflects the warning of Isaiah against those of his day who said, “Speak to us smooth things, prophesy deceits” (30:10). Against this sentiment, Paul warned that we must, “Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering  and teaching. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables” (2 Tim. 4:2-4).

Every generation has those who are ashamed of the gospel (Rom. 1:16), those who want “smooth things” and those who have “itching ears.” Like those of Israel who wanted to be “like the nations about us” (1 Sam. 8:5), we have some in the church who plead for unity in diversity, who want tolerance toward error, who are willing to sheath their sword and sit down at tables of compromise with those in error. Reactions against strong preaching abound. The editor and staff writers of Truth Magazine have been accused of “turning off a whole generation of younger preachers” because of the “hard preaching” being done. Many churches today are filled with unrest because strong preaching of- fends some while others feel that distinctive preaching is being omitted. I know of churches which have had to plead for their preachers to speak plainly, to preach a distinctive gospel message. Some of these preachers have gone into the liberal, institutional fellowship because they refused to preach the distinctive gospel in a local church and courted unity in diversity until asked to leave. When they leave, they find a church where smooth things are more palatable, where tolerance for error has a home. Epithets of disdain are hurled against those who preach “the whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27). They are “watchdogs,” “guardians of orthodoxy,” “new Catholics,” “buzzards looking for dead carrion,” or “brotherhood managers.” Please note the disparity between those who want smooth things in doc- trine but who are willing to use vitriolic language toward brethren who insist on sound doctrine.

Some who are currently espousing “smooth things,” who want tolerance toward error and unity in diversity, those who are embarrassed by strong preaching, have found what they believe to be comfort in Romans 14. This chapter of the Bible which directs brethren to receive one another in “matters of scruples” (v. 1), “authorized liberties” (1 Cor. 8:9; 10:23), is being twisted and wrested (2 Pet. 3:16) so that some are willing to receive one another in sinful doctrines and practices. A rationale for open-ended fellowship with sin is being preached across the nation and around the world by esteemed brethren who, because of their reputation and popularity, are leading many astray. Of course, different brethren accept varying degrees of smooth preaching, but that there is a movement, a voice, a rationale for apostasy cannot be denied.

The leading voice for smooth things today is Christianity Magazine which began its maiden voyage into the sea of religious journalism by the keynote: “accentuate the posi- tive; eliminate the negative.” That this is thematic and not incidental nor accidental is indicated by instructions to its writers from an editor to limit the use of Scripture. “Each article is thus to be short and limited to one major point. Do not tell us all you know, but what you know most surely. Generally speaking, two or three passages should provide a sufficient base for such articles — perhaps even one.” Not content just to limit the amount of Scripture, the same editor proposes suggestions to make the articles “popular.” “Obviously, what we are after is a piece of journalistic writing. The thrust of the article should be practical, speaking to the real needs of people. The style of writing should be popular. We urge you to be your creative best: think of interest-catching leads, sharp illustrations, and, if appropriate, and if possible, sprinkle in a little wit.” (Contrast that with the instruction of Paul to Timothy and Titus and the difference is obvious.)

Lest someone think this approach to religious writing inconsequential, error has been boldly taught by Ed Harrell in his series on Romans 14 in defense of Homer Hailey’s error (cf: Homer Hailey: False Teacher?, Nov. 1988; The Bounds of Christian Unity, Feb. 1989-May, 1990). Though this series of articles was a bold departure from the stated editorial theme of non-controversial material, that same editorial policy was reinstated when numerous brethren asked to respond. In effect, error was taught smoothly by Ed Harrell and no rebuttal was permitted. None of the other editors ever publicly rejected the error that was taught. Thus, Romans 14 was twisted by brother Harrell to teach that it “tolerates contradictory teachings and practices on important moral and doctrinal questions” (May 1990). The “important moral and doctrinal question” put under the aegis of Romans 14 by brother Harrell was the error taught by Homer Hailey on “aliens who would come to God” in adulterous marriages.

As this controversy has spread, and as Romans 14 has been widely used as a defense for fellowship on adulterous marriages, other brethren have advocated this twisted use of Romans 14 to allow fellowship in other areas. We have seen the beginning of departure, not the end.

The Language of Smoothness

It is not hard to recognize the voice of those who want “smooth things” to be advocated today. There are key phrases and “Shibboleths” that reveal a softness toward sound preaching and a desire to promote compromise. Have you been hearing this lately?

We need to have unity in diversity. We have more in common with some people than we have disagreements. Let’s just emphasize our agreements.

Let’s eliminate the negative and accentuate the positive. We have heard too much of preaching that is against sin.

We need to love one another and stop all this preaching against things. The Bible is just a love letter, not a pat- tern book.

We are hearing too much about the church and not enough about the cross; too much doctrine and not enough about Christ; too much law and not enough about grace.

We need to stop judging in matters of opinion such as shorts and swim suits, the use of wine, how many times members ought to attend worship services, clapping in services, gambling, and such like.

Who can say for sure that a certain doctrine is absolutely wrong. Do you know everything? Are you setting yourself up to the another’s judge?

There are so many different positions on this subject (remarriage and adultery, use of wine, etc.) that who can be sure which is right. The Bible is just not clear on this subject.

It seems like there are some brethren who are intent on controlling the brotherhood. We need to have a moratorium on controversial preaching.

Let’s just let each local church decide for itself who it is going to receive into its fellowship. It is nobody’s business but the local church.

Have you heard about the large crowds that turned out to hear brother P.M.A. Goodspeak? We need to get him here for a meeting so we can have large crowds too. He doesn’t condemn anyone.

Aren’t you tired of the old church of Christ traditions? We need to tune in to the Spirit more and liven up our worship with new songs like they sing at camp, clap our hands, be less formal and have shorter sermons.

We need to learn the language of young people. They are the church of tomorrow and we need to do things for them to keep them interested in the church. If we don’t watch out, we are going to lose our young people to other churches that have planned youth programs.

Brethren, the battle against unity-in-diversity will never be won. The cast of characters and list of issues will change from generation to generation. Within the Lord’s church are some that are “ashamed of the gospel.” However irate some become when this charge is made, it must be emphasized that there are brethren who want to be tolerant of error, fit into modern society, eliminate strong preaching against sin, and go smoothly into apostasy. Their policy for smoothness is to use Romans 14 as a chapter of permissiveness, allowing error to be fellowshipped. Of course, some are ignorant of the danger and are shocked to hear this condemned, blaming those who oppose the error as the instigators of controversy. Some stand on the side lines, shaking their heads, dismayed that names are called, hoping it will all go away of its own accord. However, we need not be naive. Error will disappear only when it is met by the “sword of the spirit” (Eph. 6:17). Such battles do not permit smooth sailing into apostasy. There will be controversies, battles, debates, and discussions. Through this fiery time, truth will triumph and those who want “smooth things” will depart into their place. Has it ever been any different?

Speaking Smooth Things About . . .God’s Righteousness Versus the Imputed Righteousness of Christ

By Connie W. Adams

The ecumenical mood has caught up with us. Instead of uniformity of belief and practice, based on objective truth, the going concern is for “unity in diversity.” In an attempt to broaden the base of fellowship, a smooth, but deadly Calvinistic doctrine has been pressed into service. It opens the door for fellowship with those who advocate instrumental music, institutionalism, pre- millennialism, false teaching and practice on marriage, divorce and remarriage, and who knows what next.

The Protestant doctrine of the imputation of the personal righteousness of Christ to the Christian, makes the grace of God an umbrella to cover sins of “weakness” and “ignorance.” Instead of working to bring all to agreement with “the faith once delivered to the saints,” a warm syrup has been poured all over us so that we can “build bridges, not fences” as some like to express it.

False Assumptions

“For the Lord promises nothing except to perfect keepers of his law” (John Calvin). “His perfect law must be vindicated by being kept perfectly in a human life” (Edward Fudge, A Perfect Salvation). But we have a problem here. Man does not perfectly keep God’s law. Ah, but Jesus did. “As Bunyan so beautifully put it, for thirty-three years Christ wove a garment of perfect righteousness to be given away” (Present Truth, April 1977, 21). Since we do not perfectly keep God’s law, and Christ did, then somehow his perfect life must be credited to us. This is the doctrine of the imputation of the perfect righteousness of Christ. It is assumed then that the perfect life of Christ is a substitute for my sins. The truth is that his death was a substitute for my penalty.

What About Imputed Righteousness?

In Romans 4:3-8, Paul spoke of Abraham and said, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.” Even so, when the ungodly turns to believe on him who justifies, “his faith is counted for righteous- ness.” He then quoted David who describes the blessedness of those unto whom God “imputeth righteousness without works.” “Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.” To impute means to credit to one’s account. Paul said nothing here about imputing the personal righteousness of Christ to man. The man to whom God does not impute sin is the one whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered.

Paul said that in the gospel is “the righteousness (justification) of God revealed from faith to faith, as it is written: the just shall live by faith” (Rom. 1:16-17). That “faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God” (Rom. 10:17). When a sinner hears, believes, and obeys the gospel, then on the basis of the shed blood of Christ (his sacrificial death, not his perfect life) God forgives and sins are covered. To that man God does not impute sin. Why? Because his sin is forgiven, covered. He is now justified, proclaimed righteous. He has emerged from darkness into marvelous light (1 Pet. 2:9).

But this smooth false doctrine proceeds from one false assumption to another. If Christ’s perfect obedience is transferred to our account, then it is not necessary for us to obey the gospel to be saved. Then when we sin, either through ignorance or weakness, when God looks upon us, he does not see the sin at all, but only the perfect obedience of Christ. Even though we may persist in this ignorant or weak sin, it does not matter. We are under the umbrella of grace. When that good-hearted man worships with the instrument, or supports the missionary society, or endorses church support of various human institutions through which to do the work of the church, or that sincere preacher who advocates that we should extend fellowship to those who have divorced  and  remarried  without  fornication  as  the cause of divorce, then we should not be judgmental about any of that, for God only sees the perfect life of Christ, not the sinful practice. Smooth? Yea, verily! Wrong? To be sure.

Fallacies

Such a doctrine eliminates obedience. Christ is the author of “eternal salvation to all them that obey him” (Heb. 5:8-9). Saul of Tarsus was to go into Damascus for there he would be told what he “must do” (Acts 9:6). We can’t even get a verse like these quoted before the charge of “legalism” pierces the air. We are told that we have just ruled out grace. Grace is the basis of our salvation. God did not offer his favor because we deserved it. But the question that has to be settled is whether or not that favor is bestowed conditionally or unconditionally. If unconditionally, then there is no escape from universal salvation. Grace is still grace when we believe and act upon what God said.

This notion denies the truth of personal accountability. “The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him” (Ezek. 18:20). “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad” (2 Cor. 5:10). There is not a single passage which states that the righteousness of Christ is imputed to anyone. There is no passage which says that our sins were imputed to Christ.

This doctrine falsifies the nature of man. “Man . . . by nature utterly void of that holiness required by the law of God, positively inclined to evil. . .” (The Standard Manual For Baptist Churches, by Edward T. Hiscox, 60). “The fact that man, by nature, is a sinner . . . It is an eternal principle that man, because he is man, sins” (The Grace of God, by Edward Fudge, 14, 17). Does man sin? Yes. Does he ever obey the Lord? Yes. Now, when one obeys the Lord, does that mean that he is “inclined to good” and that “by nature”? If not, why not? The truth of the matter is that God made us with the power of choice. Every time I have ever sinned, I chose to do it. Every time I ever did something right, I chose to do it. Neither the nature of Adam nor the perfect life of Christ has been imputed.

This view offers false security. It leads people to think that error is as acceptable as truth. “Buy the truth and sell it not” (Prov. 23:23). A perverted gospel is not as good as the real thing. If you think it is, then ponder Galatians 1:6-9. Those who are determined, for whatever reason, to shelter those who teach error, do them no favor and render a disservice to the coming generation. Don’t be deceived by smooth things.