Does God Exist?

By Keith Sharp

Have you ever stood alone on a star-filled evening and marvelled at the silent majesty of the infinity into which you gaze? Have you ever paused to meditate upon the unmeasured enormity of that expanse, its known portion being measured in billions of light years? Have you considered the astounding precision of each movement of this awesomely complex universe? Then did you wonder from whence it all came? Did unthinking forces in matter cause all this unimaginable precision and beauty? If so, from whence came the forces and matter? Is it not obvious that an all-knowing, all-powerful God is the only reasonable answer? “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made” (Romans 1:20; New American Standard Bible). In the presence of such undeniable evidence that surrounds us all, only the fool can save, “There is no God.” (Psalm 14: 1) Indeed, “The heavens declare the glory of God!” (Psalm 14: 1)

TRUTH MAGAZINE XVII: 42, pp. 12-13
August 30, 1973

On the English Scene Dear God – Don’t Forget Our Children

By Fred C. Melton

While in conversation with a local English merchant, I received the pointed comment, “You Christians are a dying race” to which sadly replied, “Only in England, Sir, only in England.” I then assured him that although the world community did not reflect it, the number of fundamental Bible believing people were on the increase while the traditional or “orthodox” groups were indeed waning badly. This brought him rather skeptically to the subject of why “fundamentalism” was so much stronger in southern America than in southern England (the English know much more about America than Americans know about England).

Irreligious Atmosphere

Comparatively speaking, the whole religious atmosphere throughout Europe is non-religious, even anti-religious, except where Catholicism is predominate. Children being raised in such a community learn quickly to either be apathetic or cynical toward all religions. In any country where a -state religion” prevails, zeal, individualism and leadership are stifled. State religions are simply an effort to emulate such closed communities as Old Testament Israel or Catholicism, but fail completely because precious few of their citizens are the slightest bit inclined to be obedient believers, nor do they ever intend to become so. Men should have learned by now that God does not wish anyone to be a Christian against his will.

Compulsory Religious Education

A pathetic effort to force “orthodox” religious views upon English school children through the state educational systems has been disastrous from the very start. Conventional attitudes might be seen in a simulated teacher’s meeting to select a “religious instruction” teacher. Headmaster: “Well, who is going to teach the R.I. class this year?” -(silence)- Headmaster to English Teacher: “What about you taking it this time, Mr._______? English Teacher: “Sir, I’m just too busy this year, I’m terribly sorry but could you get someone else?” Headmaster to the Science Teacher: “How about you, Mr._________? Science Teacher:

Wel-l-l, Oh, very well, I suppose we must be fair about this matter.” Many such teachers neither understand nor believe the Bible.

My own son’s teacher at the moment believes and teaches both modern miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit and the millennial reign of Christ on earth. Consequently, students are presented with Bible truths intermingled with error in such a way that they neither believe nor respect the Word of God. The common complaint about religion in England is that it is boring and hypocritical. The former arrogance and the modern apathy of the clergy have taken a terrible toll upon the potentially religious. The average Englishman sincerely believes that he knows just about all there is to know about religion and often ridicules the “gullibility of the naive Americans.”

Attitude of Brethren Toward Children

I’m afraid that our own brethren in England have adopted much of the traditional sectarian attitude toward the teaching of children. It is widely held by religious groups in England today that Sunday Bible classes are only for children while the assemblies are only for adults. The “closed communion” concept among the churches of Christ here has tended to further isolate the children from the morning assemblies. I recall that one visiting child at a morning worship service was seen putting a “tupence” into the collection plate. Some of the brethren were quite alarmed at this because as they reasoned, “these children are not vet Christians and only Christians are permitted to contribute to the Lord’s church.”

When Bible classes are held for children, it is usually in the afternoon, while the mother often stays home Sunday evening “because of the children.” Consequently, our own brethren are losing their children to the world at an alarming rate. If such attitudes and influences continue in the Lord’s church, we shall indeed become a “dead race.” The age of the average member of the Lord’s church in England is now well over 50 years old with a few voting people hanging on for dear life.

What is the Answer?

The answer is, of course, to thoroughly Indoctrinate our children in the teachings of Christ, both in the church and at home. Parents must set an example of belief and faithfulness for their children to follow. The Lord’s church in America should heed the warning of their English brethren’s plight and-watch out for your children! Even as God has said to Israel, who were His people at that time, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou has forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” (Hosea 4:6) Dear God, don’t forget our children.

TRUTH MAGAZINE XVII: 42, pp. 6-7
August 30, 1973

Editorial – Training Young Preachers

By Cecil Willis

Though many problems confront the church today, one of the most acute is the shortage of trained men to preach the gospel. Timothy was told to transmit that which had been committed to him “to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also” (2 Tim. 2:2). The perpetual need for the dissemination of the gospel assures the continuing need for a supply of gospel preachers.

Any church that recently has gone through the ordeal of trying to locate an experienced, able, and faithful preacher to work with them is aware of the shortage of preachers. A few years ago, some of the liberal brethren tried to warn young preachers that if they did not “line-up” with the liberal clan, they would be without a place to preach. But our liberal brethren have proved to be very poor prophets. Apparently there are considerably more faithful churches than there are faithful preachers.

This shortage of faithful preachers has caused a number of churches to begin giving more attention to the need for training men to preach. A few years ago, some “sage” (?) concocted the aphorism, “If you can keep from preaching, don’t preach.” Certainly every gospel preacher must have a strong commitment to his duty as a preacher. But many competent young men never become preachers simply because they never get the encouragement to prepare themselves to preach. Quite frankly, I was not having, any trouble at all keeping from preaching. But some brethren encouraged me to consider devoting my life to gospel preaching. I now am very much appreciative to those who were not passive about whether I preached or not.

Preaching Schools

Every church should be a preaching school. 111indreds of churches which have used the fulltime services of a gospel preacher for a score or more years never have produced one gospel preacher. Why is this true? Frequently the reason why young men do not devote themselves to preaching is because they do not get the encouragement and the necessary training at home. Hannah planned from his birth that Samuel should be the Lord’s servant (1 Samuel, Ch. 1). Timothy was trained by his mother and grandmother from his childhood (2 Tim. 1: 35). The initial encouragement for young men to preach the gospel should come from godly and consecrated parents whose greatest delight would be to see their son devote his life to faithful preaching.

Recently I read where 35 gospel preachers have come out of one congregation. Yet there are many other churches, which have not produced a single gospel preacher. Why the difference? Some churches deliberately try to prepare competent young men to preach. Just as one does not accidentally become a child of God, neither are gospel preachers produced by accident. Someone must devote attention to encouraging and training young men to preach.

Several churches, in recent years, have really begun to concentrate on trying to qualify men to preach the gospel. Some are doing an outstandingly good job in their effort. The Expressway church in Louisville has devoted considerable time for several years to classes especially designed to qualify men to preach the gospel. As a result, at least three men are now preaching the gospel full-time, and a host of others regularly preach on weekends. The Brown Street church in Akron, Ohio has conducted some special classes that would be helpful to young men who aspire to preach. At least three or four men who studied in these classes now are preaching full-time.

The Valley congregation in Phoenix, Arizona recently has announced some special preacher training classes, which will begin in October. Teachers in these classes will be Tom Baker, Maurice Barnett, John Coffman and Homer Hailey. These special classes will last two or three weeks each. Classes will meet daily for four hours, and then four to six hours will be spent daily in the library. Students will take only one course at a time, but will complete 40 to 60 class hours in two or three weeks. Each course will be followed immediately by another. The complete series planned will be covered in two eight-month sessions.

Perhaps the most concentrated effort to train preachers being made by any faithful church known to me is that of the Kirkland, Washington church. This church employs two men on a full-time basis. These men, Lowell Williams and Jim Puterbaugh, constantly are conducting classes to edify the members and to train preachers. I am not referring to just a class or two a week. These men teach several hours every day. Another brother or two share in this teaching program of the Kirkland church in classes especially designed to qualify men to preach the gospel. There are nine men now preaching the gospel full-time who have been schooled by the Kirkland church. Last Spring when I was in a meeting at Tacoma, Washington, I learned that nine additional men were at that time engaged in a two, three, or four-year training program designed to prepare them to preach the gospel.

Recently the Nacogdoches, Texas church (Mound and Starr) has announced its intention to try to devote more time to preacher training type classes. W. R. Jones, the regular preacher for the Mound and Starr congregation, will assist in this teaching program. For several years Harold Tabor has been supported by the Mound and Starr church just to teach special classes for those interested in such studies. James W. Adams, a former Mound and Starr preacher, and who now lives at near-by San Augustine, also is going to assist in this special training effort.

Using Young Preachers

Another very encouraging practice has become fairly prevalent among faithful churches. This is the scriptural practice of using a young man in a training program as he works along side a more experienced preacher. Some of the churches known to me which have been using a young preacher to work with an older, more experienced one, are South Johnson Street in El Cajon, California; Manslick Road in Louisville, Kentucky. Floral Heights in Wichita Falls, Texas; Bellaire in Houston, Texas; and East Florence church in Florence, Alabama. Certainly there are a good many other churches engaging in this same excellent procedure.

Usually these young men are supported for a year or two to help in various ways in the local work. Then when they leave that congregation, they usually go to some beginning work, and the church that helped to train them then helps to support them until the church with which they are working is able to support a man on its own.

A part of the assignments given to the young preacher is one of special study in connection with the local preacher. Wayne Timmons of El Cajon church devotes three or four hours a day to study with a young preacher working with the congregation. That church is just now finishing work with a second young preacher, and intends to support him as he begins full-time work. Already they have begun looking around for another young man to work with them.

The young preacher is not looked upon just as a congregational “flunky.” He is expected to be at work in the congregation’s program of work. Such young men get experience at writing and preparing a bulletin, usually they get some beginning experience in radio work, they have the opportunity to engage in some gospel meeting work, they have the opportunity to participate in various aspects of the program of work of an active congregation including home Bible classes, and they have the experience of working with elders and mature preachers. Such young men are very fortunate indeed, and surely will make -less blunders and do more effective work, as a result of this experience and training.

The purpose in this article is to encourage other congregations, which are able to do so, to use more young preachers in their work. Unfortunately, churches sometimes think only in terms of what a preacher can do for them, rather than in terms of what they can do to help prepare a young preacher. Without doubt, having a young preacher to assist in the local work will be a benefit to any congregation. But perhaps the most important phase of work will be the preparation and experience gained by the young preacher.

In the section of East Texas where I grew up, there were very few full-time preachers. The smaller congregations out in the country were dad to get someone to preach for them. Luther Blackmon has said they would accept anybody who could even “mock a preacher.” That’s how I got in. I have often thought back on about six years of part-time preaching, which I did as a student. Probably I did not contribute much toward the edification of those churches, but they contributed wonderfully toward my edification and preparation. For all those beginning opportunities, I am very grateful.

Many young preachers would be delighted to have the opportunity to work with a congregation, if only during the summer months. Some small congregations, which I know, cannot support a preacher on a full-time basis. So they have employed student preachers, just for the summer months. Such a practice can be very helpful to a struggling work, and to a struggling young preacher.

A young man cannot learn to preach without opportunities to preach. Many of the young men, who are yet pursuing their college educational work, have virtually no opportunities to preach. The little congregations which used student preachers when I was a college student often have full-time preachers now. While a student for four years at Florida College, I had the opportunity to preach nearly every Sunday. Some of the young men there now who plan to preach get very few opportunities to preach. This circumstance is unfortunate for these young preachers.

In some instances, young men have begun full-time work with congregations when they have not preached more than 25-50 sermons in their lives. How can brethren expect young brethren with such meager experience to do a first-class job of preaching? I propose to churches, who can possibly afford to do so, to consider employing these beginning preachers in order that they might get the experience they need really to be qualified to preach the gospel. For about $1500, imagine a church could get one of these young preachers to work with them during the summer months. Such an opportunity would do wonders for these young preachers. Perhaps men who hold a good many gospel meetings then could concentrate them in the summer months, and the availability of the young preachers would be helpful in the ongoing of the local church’s work.

This idea of the proper training and use of young preachers has been upon my mind for many months. I now toss out the idea for the consideration of brethren, hoping that it will lead to the development of more and abler young men who might continue to preach the gospel after the “old-timers” among us are long dead and gone. Think not only of what a young preacher may do for you, but think of what you may do to help encourage and prepare young preachers.

TRUTH MAGAZINE XVII: 42, pp. 3-6
August 30, 1973

Genesis

By Robin Peiser (13 years of age)

In the beginning of what was to be, 
God created you and me. 
First He made the heaven, earth and light, 
He let it shine for a while,
Then created He night. 
God said he liked it that way, 
and it all became the first day.
Next, God gave a few other orders; 
He divided the firmament from the waters. 
God called the firmament heaven, to say, 
I have made the second day.
Now God created the earth and seas, 
He also created grass, seeds and trees. 
God said he liked it that way, 
and it all became the third day.
God now made two great lights, 
The greater light to rule the day,
The lesser light to rule the night. 
Now God had created the sun, moon and stars, 
He did all this so it could be ours. 
God said he liked it that way, 
And it all became the fourth day.
God created the fish and fowl, 
He also created the whale and the wise old owl, 
God said he liked it that way, 
And it all became the fifth day.
God made the cattle and creeping things,
He also made the bird that sings. 
Now, He had one more duty to do, 
He had to create me and you. God said he liked it that way, 
And it all became the sixth say.
Now that I have done my best, 
I think I’ll take this day to rest, 
This was all God had to say,
For He had created the seventh day.

TRUTH MAGAZINE XVII: 41, p. 13
August 23, 1973