Conversion: Baptism is a Burial

By Cecil Willis

In our last lesson we addressed ourselves toward a discussion of the Greek word baptidzo, from which our English word “baptize” is derived. It was seen from over one hundred different Greek scholars that this word could mean but one thing in substance, and that is a burial. Therefore we have called this lesson, “Baptism is a Burial.”

The First “Baptism”

It is our purpose in this lesson to notice the way in which the word “baptize” is consistently used in the Scriptures. It would be well for us to notice the first baptism of which the Bible speaks. Paul spoke of this baptism in 1 Cor. 10:1,2. In this passage it is clearly seen that baptism is a burial, and cannot be sprinkling or any other act. “For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea.” Notice that Paul said that this event may be spoken of as a baptism. It should be noticed that Paul was not using this instance as New Testament baptism as commanded by Christ. This baptism was not to receive the remission of their sins, as is ours, but here it may be seen that the act of baptism is a burial. All surely remember the occasion of which Paul was speaking at this time, but let us very briefly rehearse the major events. The Israelites had gone into Egyptian captivity. God had promised to deliver them from this bondage inasmuch as He had heard their cries. Moses was chosen to be the leader in this deliverance. It finally was necessary for God to send the plagues upon Pharoah and the Egyptians before they would grant God’s people permission to leave, but finally when they were given the authority to leave, Pharoah pursued them with the army of Egypt. The Scripture says that God led them by day with a cloud and by night with a pillar of fire. With the Egyptian army bearing upon them, just as it appeared as though the Israelites were about to be driven into the sea, or be devoured by the swords of the Egyptians, Moses, the deliverer, stretched his hand out over the waters of the Red Sea, and they parted: “And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and Jehovah caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all the night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided. And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left” (Ex. 14:21,22).

Paul said that these people were baptized in the cloud and in the sea. The cloud was above them, and as thev went through the sea, it is said that the water made a wall on each side of them. They were beneath the cloud and in the sea. They were covered by the cloud, with the sea forming a wall on each side of them. This shows that baptism must be overwhelming, a covering up, It would be interesting to hear one who says that baptism is sprinkling or even pouring, try to explain this passage, and show someone how it was that the Israelites were baptized in the cloud and in the sea. It is conclusively seen that the baptism here is a burial.

John’s Baptism

Chronologically, the next significant baptism recorded, is that of John the Baptist, who preached in the wilderness of Judea, preparatory for the coming of the Lord. There were many that went out unto him, and that were baptized at his hands. Matthew says: “Then went out unto him Jerusalem, and all Judea, and all the region round about the Jordan; and they were baptized of him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins” (Matt. 3:5,6). Much of John’s baptizing was done in the Jordan River. While it is readily admitted that the fact that John baptized in the river is not conclusive and deductive proof that baptism is an immersion, yet it is plain that it was not likely sprinkling. If John had only sprinkled his converts, he could have carried a small container with him that only held a quart or so, and sprinkled or “baptized” thousands. But it is said that he baptized in”Anon, near to Salim, because there was much water there” (Jn. 3:23). Regardless of the act that John performed, it was one that required much water. Neither sprinkling, nor pouring require much water. One might sprinkle an individual with only three or four drops of water, or he might pour only a cup of water upon him, yet satisfy the meaning of the words sprinkle or pour. Yet, neither of these acts require much water. Whatever John did to the people, it required much water.

Were it not for the fact that baptism is a burial, or an immersion, John’s title would have no meaning. When you speak of John the Baptist, you are speaking of John the Immerser. Some years ago, a denomination made a translation of the Bible and each time they came to John the Baptist, rather than translating it John the Baptist, they translated it John the Immerser, which is a very accurate translation. They tried to recall all of these Bibles, though, for when they translated John’s title the Immerser, rather than the Baptist, they bad translated their name out of the Bible. John’s baptism was an immersion, or a burial.

Baptism of Suffering

In Matt. 20:20-28, Jesus spoke of another baptism, which is called the baptism of suffering. With His divine foresight, it was possible for Him to look ahead a few days to the terrible agonies and pains through which He was to go on the cross, and these sufferings, Jesus calls a baptism. It means that he was to be covered or overwhelmed in suffering. Baptism here bears the same connotation, that of a burial.

Baptism in the Holy Spirit and in Fire

John the Baptist said “I indeed baptize you in water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you in the Holy Spirit and in fire” (Matt. 3:11). In both these baptisms mentioned in this verse, the baptism of the Holy Spirit, and also the baptism of the fire, baptism means the same thing. On the day of Pentecost when the apostles were, baptized with the Holy Spirit, they were overwhelmed, or engulfed with the Holy Spirit. At the last day, those that are rejected will be baptized with fire. They will be overwhelmed in fire.

Regardless of when or how the word is used, it still means the same thing. Baptism cannot mean anything other than immersion. In many instances in secular history, the word baptize occurs, and each time it means to sink or immerse. For example: a great battle might be spoken of, and it is said that so many ships were baptized. In other words, a certain number of ships were sunk. No matter how you use the word, it still means the same thing. It always means a burial.

The Baptism of Christ

In the third chapter of John’s gospel, we read the account of a discussion that Christ had with Nicodemus, the ruler of the Jews. Men have come to call this discourse “the discourse on the new birth,” Even though men have, not been in complete agreement as to what the Lord meant by some of the words he used, there has been virtually universal agreement on others. Jesus told Nicodemus, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except one be born of water and the spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God” (Jn. 3:5). When Christ referred to the birth of the spirit, men have been somewhat in disagreement as to what he meant, but almost all admit that when he spoke of the birth of water, he meant baptism. Some who do not want to admit that baptism is a prerequisite to entering the kingdom of God might differ with this, but all reputable scholars admit that Christ was speaking of baptism on this occasion, and referred to it as a “birth of water” necessary to one’s salvation.

When Christ spoke of the “birth of water,” He gave us a definition of the act of baptism. This expression, “birth of water,” rules out both the acts of sprinkling and pouring as being baptism, for they could not be spoken of as a birth. In some sense Jesus was saying that baptism resembles a natural birth. “Natural birth contemplates delivery, so when a man is born of water, he must be delivered from or come forth out of it. As he cannot be delivered from or come forth out of that in which he has never been, it follows that a man must be placed in water before he can be delivered from. or born of it. Hence, in order to be born of water, a man must be immersed in it that he may emerge from it. But what resemblance to a birth has sprinkling or pouring water upon any one? Can a man be born of a substance less than himself? Such a thing is impossible with everyone save him who practices sprinkling or pouring water as baptism. (Actually, it is impossible with them too, but they are not willing to admit it. No one can be, born of anything smaller than himself. That should be admitted by all.) How a grown man or woman may be born of a drop or a spoonful of water is a mystery which needs explanation” (Brents, The Gospel Plan of Salvation, pg. 322). So even here, Christ taught that only immersion can be baptism, for only immersion may be spoken of as a birth.

Let us notice another instance in which baptism is shown to be immersion. In speaking of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch, Luke said, “And as they went on the way, they came unto a certain water; and the eunuch saith, Behold, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thy heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they both went down into the water, both Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him. And when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip; and the eunuch saw him no more; for he went on his way rejoicing” (Acts 8:36-39). Let us observe how this baptism took place. They came unto the water, which means nothing more than they arrived at a certain water. Then they commanded the chariot to stand still, got out of the chariot, and went down into the water. Philip baptized him, and tben they came up out of the water. Remember that the word “baptize” means to immerse, or Submerge, Now then, these questions? Did Philip and the Ethiopian go down into the water, and there Philip sprinkled a few drops of water on the nobleman? It is possible for those who sprinkle and pour for baptism, to speak of their baptism as this eunuch’s is spoken of? Is it possible for the administrator and the candidate to go down into and come up out of the water when one is sprinkled a few dfops of water on the nobleman? Is it for two people to go down into and come up out of a few drops of a jar full of water? The answer to all these questions is an unequivocal, “No!” We may look elsewhere in the New Testament and see exactly what Philip did to the eunuch when they went into the water.

“Buried . . . in Baptism”

Paul said, “having been buried with him in baptism, litrein ye .vere also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead” (Col. 2:12). What is baptism? It is a burial. Any act that may not be described as a burial is not baptism. Paul says: “Or are ye ignorant that all we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him through baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised through the glory of the Father, so we also might walk in newness of life” (Rom. 6:3,4). In both these passages Paul affirms that baptism is a burial. We were buried with Christ in baptism into death.

I have talked with men on different occasions who teach that sprinkling and pouring, as well as immersion may be baptism. Sometimes they will say that they do not know what the act of baptism is. I have asked them to let nie read to them two passages, Col. 2:12, and Rorn. 6:3,4, and then I will let them tell me what baptism is, in these passages it is said that baptism is a burial. Never have I had anyone tell me that sprinkling or pouring is a burial. Paul said baptism is a burial. Now, is sprinkling or pouring a burial? If not, then they are not baptism.

What would you think if you went out to the cemetery to witness the burial of a body, and instead of burying the body, a man were to walk up and sprinkle a handful of dirt on it? If you walked up to him, and asked hini why he did not bury the body, and he answered, “Oh, but I did bury it”, what would you say? The point I am trying to bring out is that sprinkling and pouring are not burials, but baptism is. Immersion is a burial, and immersion is the only act that is baptism.

Paul said in Romans 6 that when we obey the gospel, our actions are similar to the death, burial and resurrection of Christ, He said that we have died to sin, are buried with Christ in baptism, and are raised to walk in newness of life. At the time that we are baptized, we are dead to the practice of sin, having repented, but are yet alive to the guilt of sin. We are baptized to have the guilt removed. We see, therefore, that only immersion is baptism, and that if you were sprinkled or had water poured on you, you were not baptized. We beseech you to die to sin by repenting, to be buried with Christ in baptism for the remission of sins, and then be raised to walk the life of the spirit, having quit the life of the flesh.

Truth Magazine XX: 38, pp. 595-596
September 23, 1976

Why Denominations Exist

By Dennis L. Shaver

Denominationalism is one of the greatest evils ever to face mankind. Through this device Satan offers false hope to an innumerable host of individuals. Have you ever wondered why such institutions came into existence and how they are perpetuated? Why does the cry for oneness of our Savior fall upon deaf ears? Why do so many accept the way of denominationalism? I am sure that these are questions continually in the mind of sincere Christians. Perhaps if we understood the reasons, or attitudes, behind denominationalism we could better defeat it. I would like to suggest the following reasons, or attitudes, behind denominationalism.

Denominations Exist Through Man’s Ignorance

Every individual has at least one area in which he is ignorant. Among the many things of which I am ignorant is electricity. When I do battle with electricity, I end up the loser. The times have been many when my ignorance concerning electricity gave me a “little tingle.” However, ignorance does not have to continue, unless I allow it. It can be easily corrected with knowledge.

Ignorance of God’s Word caused denominations to begin and it fans their flame today. Ignorance of the Lord’s will will cause man to devise his own ways of righteousness and to ignore the way of God. The apostle Paul said, “Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves to the righteousness of God” (Rom. 10:1-3). When man is ignorant of God’s way of salvation and righteousness he seeks his own ways and fails to submit himself to Almighty God. This is what denominations do-they fail io submit themselves to God. I do not mean to say they do it purposely. Many times they fail to realize, as did the Jews, their wrongs. Jeremiah said that the way of man is not in himself. Those who would perpetuate denominations fail to realize this important fact, for they are trying to reach God through ignorance instead of submission.

There is a way to remedy this problem. Study. If we are to rightly divide the word of God we must study it, know it, and understand it (2 Tim. 2:15; 1 Cor. 14:20; Jn. 8:31,32). As long as men continue in ignorance of the Bible, denominations will continue to stand and grow larger. We need to encourage men everywhere to study their Bibles. As the apostle Peter declared, “. . . to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of life” (Jn. 6:68).

Because of Man’s Pride-Solomon stated that pride goeth before destruction and an haughty spirit before the fall. So it is with denominations. Man is a creature that places much pride in his own creations and would rather “go down with the ship” than admit error. According to history, both Alexander Hamilton and his son died in pistol duels over a matter they knew they were wrong about, yet because of pride neither would admit wrong. Many in denominations know they are wrong, but rather than admit it they will lose their soul to the devil.

Denominations look with pride upon their accomplishments, from social work to large buildings and youth organizations. In many instances denominations are nothing more than a social club. When men build human organizations, and use their own wisdom in such building, they point to this thing he has done with great pride. Denominations depend upon such pride as their life’s blood, rather than the blood of our Lord.

As long as man puts pride before obedience, denominations will exist and prosper. Men must be taught that submission and obedience will please God, not human pride. The works man can point to with pride are not the works of God which lead to righteousness. We cannot take credit for the works we perform, for they are ordained of God (Eph. 2:10). The works of a Christian are not of his own making, but they are of the direction of God. As the apostle Paul stated, “For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me: yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel” (1 Cor. 9:16).

Christians can be thankful they are members of the body of Christ, the church of Christ. However, we cannot look with pride to the church, for it is not of our own making. God purposed it before man ever existed, and without the help of man. Christ died before it could come into existence. The Spirit had to reveal the plan of God unto man before he could know the mind of God. Without the purpose of God, the sacrifice of Christ, and the revelation of the Holy Spirit, man would still be without salvation, groping to find more than this life. Let us teach men to look to God and his divine organization, the church. Teach all men to submit themselves to the Lord of all, and obey with gratitude His will.

The defeat of ignorance and pride will do much in wiping away all denominations, no matter what name they wear. In the next article we will discuss two more attitudes of denominationalism.

Truth Magazine XX: 37, p. 588
September 16, 1976

How Long?

By Donald P Ames

Several years ago, while living in Arkansas, we were working with some Baptist neighbors, who had become slightly prejudiced against the Lord’s church. In order to help break down that prejudice, while inviting and working with them to attend services with us, we volunteered also to attend services with them whenever ,hey had a meeting come up at the Baptist church as well.

About four months later they were having such a meeting, so we began making plans to attend at least one night of their meeting. Much to our surprise, as the meeting time arrived, instead of going to their meeting or even expressing a desire we go with them, they traveled to a nearby town each evening and spent the evening there. Finally, curiousity got the better of us, and we inquired why they were absenting themselves from their meeting. The reply was very revealing: The visiting preacher was using a dummy and practicing ventriloquism each evening to keep the kids interested. They did not feel such antics belonged in the pulpit where the desire should be to preach the word and not to put on a show.

The interesting thing about their reaction is that our liberal brethren are rapidly moving in the same direction as this Baptist preacher was. I have noted in calalogs put out by the liberals over the past two years a growing emphasis on a “puppet ministry,” which is also cropping up fairly regularly in certain church bulletins as well. Now, in the latest issue of the Gospel Services catalog on Audio Visuals is a half-page, back page ad on “Magic Object Lesson Material-easy-to-do tricks illustrate spiritual truths.” Here is an ad of four volumes of “simple but professional magic tricks” one can learn !o use in sermons-“effective tricks with talks to accompany each trick.” These four volumes of Sermons In Magic by H. P. Wells can also be accompanied by Spiritual Applications For Tarbell, Vol. I by Jule L. Miller-“a companion book to Volume One of the famous Tarbell Course in Magic.” It is described as “a store house of simple magic tricks and effective spiritual talks.”

It is beginning look as if our brethren have forgotten that the gospel is God’s power to save (Rom. 1:16), and no, he idea that we must set up a talent show to seek to provide entertainment and fun for the kiddies-plus coffee and donuts for the adults, no doubt! Makes me wonder: How long will it be till we are unable to get Dot only the denominationalists, but our own members, to attend because “such showmanship has no place in the pulpit?” Some of our brethren need to go back and relearn the impact of the message contained in John 6.

Truth Magazine XX: 37, p. 587
September 16, 1976

Situation Ethics

By Steve Willis

“Ethics” has to do with what one “ought” to do. Situation ethics means the “situationist (the individual practicing situation ethics-SW) enters into every decision-making situation fully armed with the ethical maxims of his community and its heritage (this includes the Bible-SW) and he treats them with respect as illuminators of his problems. Just the same he is prepared in any situation to compromise them or set them aside in the situation if love seems better served by doing so” (Joseph Fletcher, Situation Ethics, p. 26). The only rule is no rules are definite, or absolute. Love is supposed to decide what is good. Rules are “. . .only valid if they happen to serve love in any situation” (p. 30).

Situation ethics means in some cases (perhaps to save a life), as long as there is love (and to serve love), God permits lying, fornication, murder, or any other act that would in other situations be considered sin. There are two major fallacies, regarding love.and regarding goodness, that are foundations of the situationist view.

God is love (1 Jn. 4:8,16). God’s infinite love has already determined the rules for men, This is the highest love, which no man can match. Which situationist is to say that his love in a given situation is greater than God’s love? If love is the norm, let us use God’s love. “. . .and whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has been truly perfected” (1 Jn. 2:5). “For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments” (1 Jn. 5:3).

No one is good except God alone. This is what Jesus said in Mk. 10:18. A man had just asked what to do to have life. Jesus told the man to “keep the commandments” and then listed: “You shall not commit murder-, You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; Honor your father and mother; and You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Mt. 19:17-19). What man can claim to know what is good except by revelation from God? Eph. 2:9 teaches that man cannot determine the works that will save him. Does the situationist think himself so good that he can transcend the goodness, the laws of God?

God is love. If love demands good be done to an individual, do what God has defined as good, His commandments. Our knowledge might not think some acts would be “good” in a situation, but that is because our knowledge is finite. God’s “commandments are not burdensome (1 Jn. 5:3). Keep them!

Truth Magazine XX: 37, p. 587
September 16, 1976