The Subtlety Of It

By Donnie V. Rader

The problem with indifference is that many who have it don’t know it; and those who do don’t care. Few, if any, churches exist that do not have some members who are indifferent.

What Is Indifference?

Indifference is apathy, unconcern, and disinterest. The dictionary says, “1. Characterized by a lack of partiality or bias. 2. Not mattering one way or the other; of no great importance. 3. Having no marked feeling one way or the other . . . 4. Having no particular interest or concern . . . 8. Not active or involved” (American Heritage Dictionary 655). Those lacking in diligence, dedication, and devotion are indifferent. Simply put it is an “I don’t care” attitude.

Like a cancer, indifference eats away at the life of a Christian and a local church.

God’s People Have Always Been Plagued With Indifference

Jeremiah, the weeping prophet, lamented the fact that Judah, who was doomed to captivity, acted as if it was nothing (Lam. 1:1-12). Centuries later, the church at Corinth had a fornicator in their midst and had done nothing about it (1 Cor. 5:1-13). They were not even upset about it. Laodicea, one of the seven churches of Asia, was rebuked for being neither cold nor hot, but lukewarm (Rev. 3:15-16).

The People of God Should Be Diligent, Devoted And Zealous

We should seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness (Matt. 6:33). The priority of our life should be for God to rule our heart and live right before him. In so doing, we will sanctify (set apart) God in our hearts (1 Pet. 3:15). Our service to God must be with a fervent spirit (Rom. 12:11).

Solomon wrote, “Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with your might” (Eccl. 9:10). If anything deserves our whole being, it is the service of God. Paul said, “And whatever you do, do it heartily, as to the Lord and not to men” (Col. 3:23).

When God is served with all our soul and strength, we will not be indifferent.

The Subtlety of Indifference

Indifference is not always easy to detect in ourselves or others. Thus, part of the danger of it is that it is subtle. What makes it so subtle?

1. It develops gradually and slowly. The Hebrew writer warned that we should give earnest heed to the word, “lest we drift away”(Heb. 2:1, NKJV ). The KJV says, “let them slip.” The footnote in the KJV adds, “Gr. run out as leaking vessels.” All of these describe a slow and gradual departure.

This doesn’t happen overnight. One is not diligent and enthused one day and the next indifferent. Rather, like a leaking vessel, it leaks out a drop at a time. That makes it hard to recognize in yourself. A casual examination of self may look okay since I may not recognize much difference in what I was a few months ago or even the year before. But the little movements accumulate over time.

I may look at my actions and see little change in what I have been in the past. But again, my examination of self may be flawed. I must recognize that indifference strikes first at the heart and then manifest itself in my actions.

2. It is harder to see what we are not doing. Paul rebuked some brethren who ought to have developed into teachers, but needed to be taught themselves (Heb. 5:11-12). It was not what they were doing, but what they didn’t do. That’s not easily seen.

Overt acts of sin are easily seen by self and others. I know if I lie, cheat, curse, drink, or steal. Even sin in attitude that involves doing is easily seen. I know if I hate, lust, am bitter, have envy, jealousy, or anger. But, it is harder to detect what I fail to do. It is even harder to see that I don’t care as much as I ought to . . . that I’m not involved as I ought to be . . . that I’m not as dedicated as I ought to be . . . that I should have grown more by now.

This principle is especially true with one whose apathy has not caused him to quit altogether.

3. We focus on the signs or fruit of indifference as being the real problem. When we see the symptoms of a problem it is easy to deal with the symptom rather than look for the cause. It is like going to the doctor with pain in your arm. The pain is merely a symptom of the real problem (i.e., a pinched nerve). If the doctor loads the patient up with pain killer, he is merely treating a symptom and not the real problem.

If one doesn’t attend as he should, we preach to him about attendance. It may not seem to do much good. He doesn’t change. If one doesn’t study and grow as he should, we may preach to him about growing and studying. Again, it may not seem to do much good. Those things we are addressing (and need to address) are symptoms of indifference. The real problem is in the heart (Prov. 4:23; Matt. 15:19). The person is indifferent! He doesn’t care! He doesn’t have the respect for God and his word as he should. That’s why our preaching on attendance or other matters may not seem to generate any change. If we can cure the indifference, the symptoms will be removed.

In other articles we will consider the causes, signs and cure.

“Andy, Barney, And The Gang”

By Jarrod Jacobs

If entertainment is an authorized, useful way of bringing people to the Lord, don’t you know we would have examples of Christ and the apostles using plays, poetry, songs, and other forms of entertainment to bring the people to God?

The longer we live, the more we see how the lines between the church and the home are continuing to be blurred by those who do not respect the will of God. The line marking the difference between entertainment and worship is being blurred in many places as well. Consider the fact that in recent weeks, I have had the opportunity to read in the newspapers about the latest fad among liberal churches of Christ. What is it? It is to set aside time for watching “The Andy Griffith Show” and trying to find some “moral” to apply to people. Now, before we get too far into this, people who know me know I like watching Andy, Barney, and everyone else in Mayberry. It is a funny show, and I enjoy it. However, the problem comes in trying to bring this into the Lord’s church and passing this off as some kind of “spiritual” message.

Just so we understand that this is not some isolated incident, nor is this hear-say, I have newspaper articles that document liberal churches taking part in this. One such article ran in the January 8-10, 1999 issue of USA Weekend. Under the heading of “Spirituality,” Dennis McCafferty talked about how Joey Fann, and Brad Grasham, both members of the Twickenham church of Christ in Huntsville, Alabama, enjoyed the show so much that they decided to get a class started. Further evidence that this is catching speed comes from an article in The Tennessean, on Sunday, February 28, 1999. The writer, Leon Alligood, went to Tullahoma, Tennessee and sat in on one of the “classes” where “The Andy Griffith Show” was shown. Of course, you can also go online and visit the website of Fann and Grasham, who offer insights into Mayberry, as well as encouraging others to start their own class on Mayberry. One reason they encourage this is because, “Basically, it (The Mayberry class, JJ) offers a casual, non- threatening atmosphere for people to get together, have fun, and think about how we handle certain situations in life” (Quote from Fann and Grasham’s website).

“Where is the harm in this?” some may ask. A better question would be, “Where is such a thing as this authorized by God?” Besides all we could enjoy about Andy, Barney, etc., the show still had its faults. For example, the characters lied in nearly every episode about something. Also, there was Otis, the town drunk. If we’re talking about good influences, etc., is it a good influence to have a “funny”drunk walking around? Let’s take a moment and consider the results of a Bible class based around “The Andy Griffith Show.”

Other TV Suggestions

Could we not follow the “Mayberry class” up with a class based around “Guiding Light,” “As The World Turns,” “Melrose Place,” “NYPD Blue,” etc.? If we can use Andy Griffith as a good example, can we not use these shows as examples of what not to do? Certainly, God gives us examples of people who are not worthy of imitation (e.g., Satan, Ahab, Ananias and Sapphira, Demas, etc.) Why not watch the TV shows mentioned above and spend time talking about what we ought not do in life? If they got good attendance from the “Mayberry class” (and they did), I guarantee people will come to the “soap opera” class! I wonder how long it will be before my suggestion is not considered “ridiculous,” but practiced?

What Attracts The People?

The people behind the “Mayberry class,” though they may have good intentions, have missed the point and purpose of Bible study and worshiping God. When we come together in worship, or in a Bible study situation, it is for that — Bible study!

I am afraid that Mr. Fann and Mr. Grasham have just followed the old standard of “attracting” people with one thing, and then springing the gospel on them later. Many liberal brethren and denominational folks will try to get “big numbers” through special days, outings, a winning ball team, pizza or chili suppers, etc. Then, once the people are there, they will get a “sprinkling of Scripture” added to the event. Is this not what is intended with the “Mayberry class”? The promise of a TV show attracts them (Who doesn’t like Andy?) and then the people are given a Bible lesson while there.

For people who see nothing wrong with this situation, remember Romans 1:16, “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.” Paul says that the gospel is the power of God to salvation. Nothing else has the power to save except the gospel. Consider also the words of Christ, “No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day” (John 6:44). Who is doing the “drawing” in this verse? God is! How is this done? Through the preaching of the gospel (2 Thess. 2:14). Paul said, “It pleased God by the foolish- ness of preaching to save them that believe” (1 Cor. 1:21). Therefore, for man to come along and implement his “think-so’s” for drawing a crowd is to say in essence that we know more about drawing people than God does.

Illustrations vs. Entertainment

Some may suggest, “The use of the TV show is merely an illustration. Jesus used illustrations, and this is all it is.” Yes, Jesus used illustrations in his teaching (vineyard, mustard seed, fishing net, ground, tree, etc.), but where do we see Jesus using entertainment as the supposed “illustration”? Where do we see Jesus using the plays, poets, and singers of the day to “illustrate” his point and “draw” the crowd to him? The apostles were the ambassadors for Christ (2 Cor. 5:20). Where do we see them stooping to that level? If entertainment is an authorized, useful way of bringing people to the Lord, don’t you know we would have examples of Christ and the apostles using plays, poetry, songs, and other forms of entertainment to bring the people to God?

Yet, what do we see in the Bible? “Preach the word  . . .” (2 Tim. 4:2); “Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15); “I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2). Time and again the command and examples are shown as to what truly does people good, and will truly “bring them in.” What will do it? It is the gospel of our Lord. It alone will truly draw, convert, and save people! We will be judged one day by the word of God (John 12:48). Therefore, doesn’t it make sense to live by that word regardless of the consequences?

“A Casual, Non-Threatening Atmosphere”

One last point to consider was the quote made by Mr. Fann in trying to justify playing “The Andy Griffith Show” as a Bible Study. He said,  “Basically, it (The Mayberry class, JJ) offers a casual, non-threatening atmosphere for people to get together, have fun, and think about how we handle certain situations in life.”

Oh, that Mr. Fann and Mr. Grasham had been around during the time of Christ and the apostles! They could have solved a lot of problems for them. Did you know Jesus had no better sense than to “offend” some people on one occasion (Matt. 15:12)? In fact, the Bible says that Christ caused some people to be “filled with madness” because of what he preached (Luke 6:11). You reckon these people Christ taught felt “threatened”? Perhaps John wouldn’t have lost his head if he had told Herod “it is not lawful for thee to have thy brother’s wife” (Mark 6:18) in a “casual, non-threatening atmosphere.” Brethren, those who know me know I’m all for an open atmosphere of study where people are encouraged to open their Bible and study for themselves. But, there comes a time when sin must be threatened. There comes a time when we must stop playing around and charge upon Satan and sin with the “sword of the Spirit” (Eph. 6:17). Read 2 Corinthians 10:4-6, and explain how acting like this will make those in sin feel comfortable, or not threatened. The problem we are facing in this country is that we have a generation of people who are more concerned with people’s physical comfort than their spiritual welfare! The “unforgivable sin” for many is to suggest that someone is living in sin. We have people today who think we can “sneak” the gospel in on people, or “trick” them into obeying the gospel with little or no confrontation of the sin and error that may be in their lives. How foolish we are for thinking this! Friends, the best thing we can do for people is to appeal to their common sense, and show them what the Bible says. Let’s not “sugar-coat” it, or apologize for what God says, but let us present the Bible to people in a loving, caring way so that they cannot misunderstand, and let the chips fall where they may.

Conclusion

Brethren, let us learn and learn well that there is a difference between the teaching of the gospel, and entertainment. People who complain about being “bored” in the services do not understand that difference. There- fore, rather than teach the truth, denominational folks, as well as some of our liberal brethren have catered to these people. This is why Andy, Barney, and the rest of the gang in Mayberry are being used as some type of “instructional tool,” and the Bible has taken a back seat. Let us learn the difference between entertainment and Bible study! Let’s leave entertainment where it belongs and the Bible where it belongs (1 Pet. 4:11; Col. 3:17).

The Emergence of the Church of Christ Denomination

By John R. Hurt

How long have you been a member of the Lord’s Church? Is it just me or is the general direction, teaching and preaching considerably different than it used to be? Where is the church of Christ headed? Are we seeing the emergence of a different religious body?

Personal Background and Reminisces

It has been nearly 32 years since I obeyed the gospel of Christ. The first weekend that I went to my girlfriend’s home town to meet her family I learned that the Sunday morning ritual included a delicious breakfast and the expectation that everyone in the house was to attend worship services and class. How could any hopeful, young suitor not conform?

My religious background was from the Presbyterian denomination. I had been sent to church by my parents who seldom attended but believed I needed a “church upbringing.” All I knew about the church of Christ was that they didn’t use an instrument of music in worship. This didn’t make any difference to me. I was in love and wasn’t concerned about the religious beliefs of my girl. I just wanted to get married. I agreed that any children we might have would be brought up in the church of Christ.

Later, after we were married, sometimes I would express my thoughts to my wife about the things that were taught, how nit picking some of them were. The thing that always got me though, was that there was always a scriptural basis for what was being taught. The level of Bible knowledge among members of the church of Christ was very impressive to me. Those people knew their Bibles! It didn’t occur to me until years later how coincidental it was that often on my next visit that very subject would come up in the preacher’s lesson with a very logical, scriptural answer to my question.

So when the same preacher came to our home and began to study a series of basic first principal les- sons with us, my mind was already prepared to look for the things the Bible taught. I was amazed at what the Bible taught about the New Testament church. The lessons that we studied taught me that the New Testament gave God’s people a complete organizational pattern for the believed that Jesus was the Christ. I was taught what the Bible says about salvation. Upon belief I was to repent of my sins (Acts 17:30). Then I was to confess Jesus as my Lord (Acts 8:37). I was then to be buried with my Lord in baptism for the remission of my sins (Acts 2:38). Then I was expected to live the Christian life faithfully until death (Rev. 2:10). What a wonder- ful plan of salvation our Lord and Savior has given to us! How could I not obey?

 

About five or ten years into my spiritual life I began to experience s o m e t h i n g t h at I b e l i e ve m a ny young children of God experience, and I’m afraid from which many never recover. I began to notice that I no longer got the same feeling of “revelation” out of most of the les- sons and sermons. I must admit that I went through a period that some- times I would experience the feeling “not this lesson again.”You see, after a few years we have heard most of the first principal and the majority of the basic doctrinal lessons. Early on as babes in Christ we can experience considerable growth just by being at the services, listening to the preach- ing, and getting up our class lessons. What’s happening is that we are literally being spoon fed the gospel as surely as we spoon feed our little children. This is, of course, the lesson Paul taught the Hebrew Christians (Heb. 5:11-14). At this time in our spiritual growth, it is time to move on to meat instead of milk. We need to understand that to grow we must begin our own study, in addition to what we get from the preaching and the assembly. To be pleasing to God, we must bear fruit and grow in knowledge (Col. 1:10). The danger is that many don’t study properly and grow. Then comes the frequent cry! “Not this lesson again.” When I began to study properly, I never again experienced any such feelings, and I began to experience the “full

assurance,” “wealth” and “treasure” that comes from a personal study of God’s word (Col. 2:2, 3).

 

 

 

Enter Subtle Changes

As I stand on the threshold of sixty and reflect on my years in the Lord’s church, I am struck by a number of things. One is the emphasis of our preaching and teaching as opposed to that of 30 years ago. One of the individuals that I often discussed this with would become infuriated whenever I brought up this point. “It doesn’t make any difference what they taught then,” was his constant reply. This, of course, is true and so was the rest of his point. “It is what the Bible teaches that matters.” How- ever, neither he nor anyone else that I have discussed this with has made any attempt to show me that the vast majority of things taught then were not the truth. There were more lessons on scriptural authority. What was it? How did we establish it? Why was it necessary? When was the last time you heard a lesson about “direct

commands,” “scriptural examples” and “necessar y inference”? How often are these subjects discussed? As we look around us, we hear a call for “the new hermeneutics.” A very liberal call for a new way to interpret Scripture. I’m convinced that one reason that we hear this call is because God’s people have forgotten or never learned the “old hermeneutic”!

Perhaps it’s just me, but I don’t believe we are getting nearly as many lessons dealing with truth and doctrinal error. If the church of Christ is correct in the doctrine we teach, the vast majority of the religious world around us is teaching error and in danger of facing judgment in that condition. Should we not continually remind God’s sheep of the dangers of false doctrine? Should we not continually prepare God’s people to be able to answer and refute error? Should we not do everything we can to try and save our friends and neighbors from the error of their way? Yet, we hear the hue and cry, “we are tired of so much negative preaching.” If Colossians 1:28 means anything, preaching Christ should be at least one half “warning or ad- monition.”

Many brethren are uneasy and worried when a preacher actually mentions the name of a denomination from the pulpit. Certainly, this should not be done in an ugly or distasteful way, but are we reaching the point that many of our brethren have so little conviction that they are ashamed to have their visitors hear the Truth proclaimed from the pulpit? Mentioning denominational names from the pulpit has long been a difference of opinion among preachers. Yet, even the casual student of the restoration movement knows that even then there were preachers that would not mention such names publicly. Make no mistake about it though, the lessons taught then were distinctive enough in nature that the audience easily understood that what was being preached was not the same message being taught by the denomination down the street. When fifty percent of the lessons taught from the pulpit become so general in nature that our visitors can’t distinguish them from what is being taught down at the Methodist Church, mark it down, we are well on our way to apostasy! Apply the fifty percent test! Pay attention, the percentage you find may surprise you.

As with every generation, God’s church is under attack. When I first obeyed the gospel, the charge from the denominational world was that we needed to “preach the man and not the plan.” The charge is the same as it has been for centuries. In the current generation the same charge takes many different forms, but the gist is still the same. From our own brethren we hear “the church is teaching too much on commandments and not enough on Jesus.” “The church is not teaching enough on ‘love.’” More recently we have heard that “we are not teaching enough on the ‘cross of Christ.’” These petty attacks often focus on words and phrases that God’s people have used over the years. The “love” brethren made a big deal out of our reference to “personal work.” They insisted that it should be called “discipling.” Now we hear from the latter group that we are not saved by a plan of salvation but by a Savior. All of these are but attacks on the emphasis of the church. There are in our midst those that would change the focus and teaching of the church of Christ. They cannot scripturally show that the teaching of the church is wrong, but they want to quit teaching the truth knowing this will change the church. If we quit preaching “all the truth” for about a generation, they won’t have to be able to refute sound doctrine. The next generation just will not know the truth!

Greater Spirituality?

As so often occurs, these ideas are usually brought in and pushed by brethren who have in times past been brave soldiers for the truth. Only God in heaven knows what causes the change in their love for the truth and motivates them to push for a church with an altogether different emphasis. The sad, tragic reality is, though, that the pews are already filled with brethren who are ready and even longing for the false doctrine that they are now teaching. There are those that have never grown for lack of personal study and those that have never heard all those sound, basic lessons of times past. The brother or sister that has never grown and matured in the nurture and admonition of the Lord is often seriously intimidated by the charge, “The church is not teaching enough on the person of Jesus.” And make no mistake about it, the church is not teaching as much on the “person of Jesus” or “the cross of Christ” as the denominational group on the corner. Not only are they intimidated by the charge, many of these brethren find, often for the first time in their spiritual lives, they are moved emotionally by these in-depth lessons. Now, not only are these brethren bored and bothered by the same old lessons on doctrine, authority and error, but they see what they feel is a greater spirituality with the brethren pushing for the new emphasis. After all, what could possibly be wrong with spending more time and emphasis centering our thoughts and affections on our Savior? To them these kinds of thoughts and charges seem to be an effective indictment of what they believe to be the out-dated teaching and doctrine of the church of Christ.

Well, perhaps we would do well to consider the question raised. Are we seeing from this new emphasis a greater more enlightened spirituality? I wonder. One young gospel preacher who was caught up in the “love” movement was thoroughly convinced of this. In several discussions, he told me that almost everywhere he went preaching these emotional, “Christ centered lessons,” some member of the church would come up to him and tell him that they had never heard, in all their years in the church, such stirring and moving lessons. Then, although the words were not quite the same, the charge and implication was that most members of the church of Christ are too legalistic, too caught up in rituals in rote and didactic discipline to have any such spiritual depth. He once said of the congregation where I used to wor- ship “they are as cold as a stone.” How could he possibly know what was in their hearts? (This preacher is now a member of a large main stream denominational group, singing in the choir and happily participating in all their many activities.) You see! All this is a judgment against my heart! Somehow, since I am a member of the church, I don’t have any “love” in my heart. Somehow, I don’t appreciate “the person” of my Lord. Somehow, I don’t have enough depth and spirituality to really understand and appreciate the “cross of Christ.”

Have They Been There?

To adequately consider their charge, please permit me the indulgence to reflect a little on personal study habits. I wonder, have most of these brethren really studied God’s Word? I mean have they really studied and meditated upon it? These brethren who clamor to be spoon fed with more spiritual, preaching lessons of the new emphasis, have they been with Jesus during that tumultuous last week of his ministry? Have they followed on each heart rending stop as Jesus was taken from the garden and then taken first to Annas, then to Caiaphas, then to the council, then to Pilate, then to Herod, then back to Pilate? Have they been there and experienced the grief, anger, horror, utter confusion and doubt. Then, have they stood with the three Marys on Golgotha’s dreadful crest and with a crushed and broken heart watched the most evil deed ever perpetrated by mankind? Through the eye of meditation have they ever wanted somehow, someway to ease the awful pain and suffering of the precious Lamb of God led to slaughter by wicked and ruthless men?

Yes, I know that the charges that we teach too much by repetition and rote are really attacking my spiritual depth. Remember, though, when they can’t refute the plain teaching of the Bible, they come after your heart, your motivation or your emphasis. What I don’t see, though, is how little spoonfuls of spirituality will ever lead to depth. How can listening to a few “spiritual” preaching lessons ever take the place of a life time of in-depth study and meditation on the Word of God? Have these brethren ever sat down and read the 119th Psalm? I mean really read and meditated upon it. Read all 176 verses, each dealing with a different aspect of the revelation of God. Have they then, after sober awesome reflection and meditation upon God’s Word, ever wept for joy? What I am describing here is what countless thousands of God’s people experience to a lesser or to a much greater degree every day of their lives. Members of the Lord’s Church need not be intimidated by those who pay a lot of lip service to the “person of Jesus” or “the Cross of Christ.”

Oh, yes, I also know that some of our brethren that accuse us of “rote religion” as well as many teachers from the denominational world that study and reflect on our Lord, can and often do achieve some degree of “spiritual depth.” The young preacher that I mentioned earlier brought up a denominational teacher that he thought was so spiritually deep. It seems he had just read one of his books and was very impressed with his spiritual insight. “How could one so spirituality deep not be in the right relationship with God?” was his query. What he and so many others with similar questions fail to realize is that the “treasures of the wisdom and knowledge” are there for all who will mine them (Col. 2:3; Rom. 11:33). Anyone who studies the Word of God in depth will be moved and built up by the gems of truth that he mines. Many, indeed, are the lessons and insights that are to be found in the inexhaustible mine of truth. With each new discovery comes a feeling of wonder and exhilaration (Ps. 119:18). The glowing coals of truth give off a warmth to the soul. Legion is the name of many who have spent a lifetime finding and meditating on the wonderful positive treasures of God’s Word. However, the real depth and spiritual understanding belongs to the student who re- members what the angel said to Peter in Acts 5:20, “Go, stand in the temple and speak all the words of this life.” If all we do is center our studying on the many wonderful and positive aspects of our Lord and Savior, our spiritual development becomes one sided. Such a student may find himself numbed by the “positive glow.” Forgive me, but isn’t this dangerously close to hedonism? Even if it is not, isn’t this the same student whose one-sided study may lead him to that often reached erroneous and fatal conclusion, that such a good and wonderful God would never send anyone to hell? What good is our study with- out the proper balance? What good is the study of the Lamb (John 1:29) without the study of the Lion of the tribe of Judah (Rev. 5:5)? Such a student forgets that it is Jesus who is the primary teacher of the fires of hell.

Perhaps, you too have talked to or maybe read an article of some brother or sister that laments that they didn’t get to hear many in-depth lessons on the “Cross of Christ” or the “Love of God” because the church where they were preached too much on “the issues” or “commandments.” Consequently, because of this they wail and blame the church for their lack of spiritual growth. Yes, the body is to be edified and the sheep fed, but is the church responsible for the total growth of every soul? Not so! The problem here is they didn’t pick up the shovel and walk into the mine!

Have those who long for positive lessons and spoon fed spirituality ever stood in the hot wilderness of Paran and observed as Korah presumed that he could take Dathan and Abiram, sons of Reuben, and take over the duties of Moses and Aaron (Num. 16)? Have they watched in Godly awe and trepidation as God, through Moses and Aaron, taught the people of God what it meant to presume they could worship God in whatever way they chose? Have they backed away in fearful haste from the tents of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram and then watched in stunned dismay and wonderment as the ground rumbled beneath them and opened up and swallowed them, their tents and their families? Have they in a moment of stunned silence stood aghast in complete belief in the terrible power of God? If through the eye of faith they have been there, they know that God demands scriptural authority for everything we do in our service to him!

Back to the “Ancient Paths”

Brethren, let us not be lulled to sleep by the voices of superficial spirituality. We need not listen to voices that espouse the wonders of the person of our Lord Jesus and teach us to know esoteric marvels of the cross of Christ. Their “more spiritual” pleas are just another call for God’s people to stop work and come down to the plain of Ono. I’m afraid that numerous such calls during the past 30 years have caused the people of God to almost stop the “great work” they have been doing. This “more spiritual” appeal reminds me of the occasion when, as Jesus preached, a woman in the audience “waxed eloquent” and cried out “blessed is the womb that bore You, and the breast at which you nursed.” Jesus replied, “On the contrary, blessed are those that hear the word of God, and observe it” (Luke 11:27, 28). What God’s people need at this point in time is less spiritual eloquence and more?

The Sin of Neutrality

By Olen Holderby

Those who remain quiet in the name of “peace” have forgotten the “gospel of peace.”

“Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly con- tend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3). The Williams Translation says, “Carry on a vigorous defense of the faith.”

The word “faith” as used here refers to the gospel — that which was “delivered unto the saints.” We may acquire a personal faith for ourselves (Rom. 10:17). Jude, then, is instructing every Christian to be vigorous in the defense of the gospel. No Christian can be neutral, where the truths of the gospel are concerned, without sinning. It makes absolutely no difference at all who is involved; when truth and right are under consideration the Christian must take his stand for the truth or be an enemy of the same.

I was recently discussing the “issues” with a brother who was serving as an elder in a local church, and he claimed to be sound in the faith. He insisted that the problems of institutionalism should not ever be mentioned publicly unless someone made an issue of them. When I pressed him on this matter, he said, “No sin should be mentioned until someone makes an issue of it.” I asked, “What sins does your preacher preach against?” His reply was, “You will have to ask him.” I did not have to wonder any longer how it was that some attending where he served did not know the truth concerning those things which he, himself, admitted to be wrong.

Neutrality comes in different forms. “Silence” is often a form of neutrality; though, “the middle-of -the-road” may be a more frequently used expression. Regardless of the form in which it may come, neutrality concerning truth is sin. John said, “Dearly beloved, stop believing every so-called spiritual utterance, but keep testing them to see whether they come from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1, Williams Translation). Those who remain quiet in the name of “peace” have forgotten the “gospel of peace” (Eph. 6:15). Paul told the Philippian Christians to strive together for the faith (gospel) and to not be terrified by adversaries (Phil. 1:27-28). The Lord commended the church at Ephesus for exposing the true character of the false teachers (Rev. 2:2). Jesus declared that those who were not with him, and those not gathering together with him were scattering abroad (Matt.12:30). The silent neutral person merely lends support to error and, in reality, assists in corrupting the church for which Jesus died (Eph. 5:25).

Read Galatians 5:19-21 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. It is difficult for me to believe the brother mentioned above does not want such sins publicly or privately condemned. However, this would be consistent with his idea of not condemning the sins involved in supporting the institutional orphan homes and the “Herald of Truth.” Brethren who sit silently by and raise no objections when the church builds kitchens, dining rooms, recreational facilities, arranges for social functions, sponsors scout troops or youth camps, and many other like things, are permitting sin to get a greater hold on the minds of those involved. In order to be free from the blood of all men, teachers of God’s Word must declare the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27). When are those in such positions ever going to learn this lesson? He who handles the word of God deceitfully (2 Cor. 4:2) is treading the path of apostasy. This cowardly path of neutrality is packed hard by the feet of them who have betrayed the Son of God, even if they do walk it in apparent pride. They have ignored the example of Jesus (Matt. 23), and they have rejected the commands of his gospel.

Being patient, kind, considerate, and understanding does not preclude our putting up a “vigorous defense of the faith.” Let every teacher read 2 Timothy 4:1-5 and let every elder read Ezekiel 33:7-9, and let both heed the instructions there, carefully! May God help us all to “declare” ourselves for our own justification (Isa. 43:26), and for those who may hear (1 Tim. 4:16).