Was He Too Young?

From an Old Preacher’s Journal

It had been a long hot summer! Field crops looked terrible. Their yield would be so low some farmers would not break even to pay for seed and fertilizer. Farm ponds were mud holes, small creeks were dry beds and larger streams were running very low and slow. It was now mid-September, and it was still hot and dry.

There was not a coat to be seen that morning at the worship service. And the funeral home paper fans got a real work out. The preacher may have even taken one into the pulpit! The sermon had to do with, “The Ten Virgins.” The attendance was 47.

That night, to the preacher’s delight, there were 50 present. The sermon was, “The New Testament Church — And Its Identity.” The sermon was concluded and the invitation was extended. As the congregation stood to sing, a small boy began to edge his way from the back up the outside isle. He was so small and young I did not take his movement very serious. In fact it went through my mind that he was easing up closer to an exit so he could get outside the moment the “Amen” was said. But much to my surprise, when he got to the front row, he turn and came to stand directly in front of me. I responded by saying, “Did you want something, sonny?” Much to my surprise he said, “Yes, I want to be baptized.” I have never believed in “infant baptism” so I asked, “How old are you?” The boy answered that he was nine-years old. I really was not acquainted with the boy and was not sure what to do next. So, I turned to an elder standing in the second row and asked if he thought we should baptize him. The Elder hesitated and then said, “That’s his grandmother standing right over there. Ask what she thinks.” The grandmother responded that he was a good boy and that he read his Bible and understood the plan of salvation. She had talked with him and felt it would be all right. The elder responded, “If she says its ok, it’s ok.”

Having settled that, now came the question as to where we would baptize him. Several brethren spoke up but no one had an answer. All the places where we usually baptized were dried up! Then I looked down and the little fellow had his hand up. Again I said, “Did you want something, sonny?” This time he responded that he had anticipated this problem, so Saturday afternoon he had walked the creek and found a place deep enough to be baptized! I was startled, amazed, and relieved. I told the brethren that if this young fellow had enough forethought to go and search out a place where he could be immersed, he must be more mature than we had supposed.

We drove some distance from the church building, through a farm gate, across the pasture field and up to the creek bank. All the while we had followed the boy’s instructions. When we got out of our cars, he led us further down the creek and sure enough, there was a low spot where the water was perhaps two-feet-deep. We took his confession and baptized him. We had a dismissal prayer and we all drove off, disappearing into the approaching darkness.

I continued to preach there from time to time and then after awhile I pretty much lost contact with that church. Over the years I could not get that young fellow out of my mind. He was so young! He was so little. Did he really know enough to be baptized? Should we have tried to put him off till he was a little older? Did we do the right thing? Was he still attending services?

Then about seven years later, I was invited back to preach a meeting there. As I drove that Monday on the way to the meeting, that boy came to mind again! When I arrived at the building I was greeted by a number of the brethren that I had known in past years. After a brief, hello, my first question was “What ever became of that little nine-year-old boy that we baptized?” The brethren turned and scanned the church yard. Then one said, “See that 6 foot, 200 pound fellow standing over there — that’s him.” He never misses a service! What a joyful relief that was!

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 6 p5 March 16, 2000

What Can We Learn From Children?

By Mike West

There could be no greater job for a parent than to teach the child about Christ and what a person must do to follow the Lord as the proverb says: “Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it” (Prov. 22:6).

As we strive daily to teach our children (an all-consuming task), there are so many things in our world that we as parents must look out for such as TV, school, friends. I’m afraid that in our effort to teach sometimes we forget to learn from them. We must remember that in order to go to heaven we must be child-like.

And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven (Matt. 18:3).

What could we possibly with all our knowledge learn from such a small child? Have you ever topped to watch a group of small children play? They don’t care if you are white, black, Hispanic, or Asian. They do not have the prejudice we do sometimes as adults. It does not matter if you are rich, poor, popular, cool or not. Can we say as Christians that daily in our effort to serve the Lord that we are child-like in these areas? Are we learning from our children (Jas. 2:8-9)?

Have you ever been around a child when the child starts to learn to read? Kaylee sometimes drives me crazy. She wants to read all the time! It never stops. Twenty-four hours a day she is bugging me to read more and more. She always wants me to write down math problems — always wanting to learn, like it is a game. Her hunger to learn is like yearning for a type of food she can’t do without. As I strive to serve the Lord, do I have this type of an appetite for the knowledge it requires to follow God’s word? “As newborn babes, long for the spiritual milk which is without guile, that ye may grow thereby unto salvation” (1 Pet. 2:2; Tit. 3:14).

And let our people also learn to maintain good works for necessary uses, that they be not unfruitful (Tit. 3:14). As adults we often have problems with others, and we might have a brother sin against us. How do we then treat that brother? Do we hold that grudge for a long time or is it forgotten immediately? How long will you be mad at someone before things are back to normal? Kaylee and Stewart will have a knock-down, drag-out fight; I will settle them down, and when I’m finished correcting them five minutes later they are best friends again. Do we forgive and love again as fast as a child? Do we forgive at all?  “Take heed to yourselves: if thy brother sin, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. And if he sin against thee seven times in the day, and seven times turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him” (Luke 17:3-4).

Children love to please their parents. They are so proud when I tell them that they have done a good job. Kaylee and Stewart always love to stand before us proud of the way they have cleaned their room or done something that they know we wanted. Do we each day want the Lord to see the way we live our lives, or do we need to act as a misbehaving child and hide in shame? “Whatsoever ye do, work heartily, as unto the Lord, and not unto men; knowing that from the Lord ye shall receive the recompense of the inheritance: ye serve the Lord Christ. For he that doeth wrong shall receive again for the wrong that he hath done: and there is no respect of persons” (Col. 3:23-25).

It is not a small task to raise a child that will follow  God’s word, and the parents who have done so should be commended and respected. They should be good examples for us all to follow, but let us all try to remember that to serve God we must learn from our children. 

25 Morning Dove Ct., Newnan, Georgia 30265 Mastiff@bellsouth.net 

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 6 p13 March 16, 2000

The Sword & Shield Begins

By Ron Halbrook

A new gospel paper named The Sword & Shield was launched in the Republic of the Philippines during 1999. It is being published quarterly under the able editorship of Lordy G. Salunga. The masthead quotes Ephesians 6:16-17, “taking the shield of faith . . . and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,” which well expresses the spirit of this new journal. Each issue carries the following clear statement of the purpose of the paper: “The Sword & Shield is committed to the open study of the Scriptures and to the preaching & teaching of the truth. It is set for the defense of the Gospel. It is not the voice of the church but each author speaks only for himself.” 

With the special encouragement of Jim McDonald and Bill Cavender, brother Salunga agreed to publish and edit this new paper. Those of us who know Lordy have complete confidence in his soundness in the faith, his ability as a writer, and his sense of fairness, the very qualities most needed to effectively edit a gospel paper.

Brother Salunga’s first editorial, entitled “The Sword & Shield Begins,” includes the following statement of principles which will guide this new journal:

Any journal has underlying principles and guidelines to steer its existence. This paper will be an open paper. This means first that both sides of an issue will be given an equal opportunity in its pages. Truth does not fear investigation. Christ told the Jews to “search the Scriptures” for these “are they which testify” of him. Christ did not fear investigation. Truth is with him. The editor does not have respect for papers which fashion themselves to be “gospel” papers but shy away from controversies and would only allow articles which are positive in nature and discussion of issues affecting the brethren are never allowed. They “accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative.” Such a philosophy is alien to the Scriptures. . . . The New Testament is replete with examples of brethren discussing an issue to resolve it (e.g. Acts 15). This journal will encourage such honorable discussion of issues affecting the brethren in the light of what the Scriptures say. It is set for the defense of the Gospel! The Scriptures are our standard. The paper will expose error and name the names of the exponents if need be. Paul wrote the Ephesians, “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but rather expose them . . . all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light” (Eph. 5:11, 13) (The Sword & Shield I, 1 [Feb.-Mar.-Apr. 1999] 2, 18, 11).

A paper published on such principles is the friend of truth and the enemy of sin and error.

Most articles to be published in The Sword & Shield are to be written by Filipino brethren. So far, a number of experienced and seasoned preachers have written excellent articles, including R.G. Carino, Sr., Domie A. Jacob, Juanito Balbin, Emilio S. Lumapay, and Cipriano S. Carpentero. Also, a number of younger men are producing fine material, including Egdon Sabio, Richley Lumapay, Ric Darasin, and Rolando P. Azurin. Good articles by W.G. “Bert” Enostacion and the Torreliza brothers, Leonito and Romeo, have appeared. The front page series by brother Carino entitled “The Scriptures Came from God” is superb, as is Cecilio S. Galosmo’s recent article, “Preaching the Whole Counsel of God” (I, 3 [Aug.-Sept.-Oct. 1999]:6-7, 13). These materials would be suitable to appear in any gospel journal published in the U.S.

Virtually all articles will be written by Filipino brethren because there are many strong, sound, solid Filipino preachers. There are so many dialects in the Philippines (about 80) that English is widely used as a common avenue of communication. Therefore, most articles in The Sword & Shield are in English, though some are in the national language (Tagalog) as well as in other widely spoken dialects (Cebuano and Ilocano). A wide range of subjects will be covered so that the paper will serve as an evangelistic tool, cover topics of interest among saints, provide some news of the work around the Philippines, and provide a question-and-answer column.

Filipino readers may receive The Sword & Shield free upon request to the editor by writing Lordy Salunga, P.O. Box 6, Tarlac City, 2300 Tarlac, Republic of the Philippines (e-mail address: lordy 1 @flashemail.com or Isalunga@hotmail.com). American brethren who may wish to read this new journal should send brother Salunga $10.00 each year. The gospel is spreading far and wide in the Philippines and multitudes of souls are being saved, just as occurred in the early days of the church in the book of Acts. The Sword & Shield will be a valuable asset to the Filipino brethren to strengthen the saved and help the lost to be saved!

3505 Horse Run Ct., Shepherdsville, Kentucky 40165-6954

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 6 p8 March 16, 2000

“Hallelujah, Christ Arose!”

By Daniel H. King

No doubt you recognize the title of this article as the beautiful closing line of Robert Lowry’s century-old hymn Christ Arose. It appears in most song books used by brethren because it represents the victorious theme of authentic Christian preaching from the day of the apostle Peter’s Pentecost sermon to the present time. Those triumphant words, “This Jesus did God raise up . . .” (Acts 2:32), must have ripped through the hearts of those Jewish leaders and their dupes who had only a month before sent Christ to his death. Imagine their frustration at the thought that they were not rid of him after all! 

But imagine the joy in the hearts of the disciples in knowing he was risen to sit at the right hand of the throne of majesty on high, “Being therefore by the right hand of God exalted . . .” (Acts 2:33). How central this theme of the Risen Christ is to the church of the first century and the church today is not well enough recognized by many who claim to put their faith in Jesus. Some who assert that they are Christians do not wish to affirm the resurrection of Christ as a fact of history, or they are not willing to argue the point. “Maybe it happened, maybe it didn’t,” they tell us, “who knows for sure?” 

I shall not forget a lectureship which I attended years ago, wherein a Roman Catholic biblical scholar addressed the audience on the topic of the resurrection. After he had spoken for some 45 minutes or so, a student (who apparently was not particularly bright), inquired of the professor: “Well, did it really happen or not?” To which the distinguished savant replied, “I’m not sure.” My friends, one thing I can tell you without any hesitation: the early church was sure that Christ rose from the dead on the third day. Early Christians lived and died for this faith. Paul said that Jesus “was declared to be the Son of God with power . . . by the resurrection from the dead; even Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom. 1:4). His Lordship, in their thinking, was attached inextricably to his having triumphed over death and the grave.

Some have striven mightily to explain the disciple’s faith. They cannot accept it at face value, because “people just don’t walk out of tombs,” in their own experience, at least. So, they have invented shallow explanations which, to their minds at least, satisfy some of the criteria surrounding the case and explain a few aspects of the gospel records. 

One theory suggests that Jesus did not actually die, but only swooned. According to this view he later succumbed to his wounds, but the disciples were fooled by his temporary “resurrection.” But, how could Jesus have moved the stone from before the tomb and escaped the guards in this weakened condition? And, what about the fact that John says that one of the soldiers on the death squad forced a spear up into his chest cavity to assure himself that Jesus was finished? 

Another view says Jesus’ followers had a grandiose hallucination and saw what they hoped for rather than reality. But, if this is true why could not the enemies of Christ produce the body? That would have ended the preaching of the resurrection! And, as F.E. Hamilton wrote: “Now it is perfectly possible for one man to have an hallucination, and two men might have the same hallucination by a singular coincidence, but that eleven men of intelligence, whose characters and writings indicate their sanity in other respects, or that five hundred men in a body should have seen the same hallucination and at the same time, stretches the law of probability to the breaking point!” 

A third hypothesis supposes that the Lord’s body was stolen. But this does not explain why the disciples of Jesus would preach what they knew to be a lie at the risk of their lives. Many of them endured horrible persecution and ultimately died as martyrs. Do men suffer or die to perpetuate what they know to be a lie?

None of these views renders a satisfying explanation for the disciples’ preaching of the resurrection. They preached a Risen Lord because they believed with all their hearts that the Lord was risen. It is that simple, and nothing else can ever explain away what they believed and why they believed it. 

The evidence found in the four Gospels, and related by all the witnesses in the first century, is characterized by great unanimity and synchrony, while obviously being told from different perspectives and in different words (proving that the witnesses did not conspire among themselves to lie, and were not coached). The summary result of what their corporate testimony announced to the world was that Jesus came forth from the grave on the third day after his crucifixion, and that he is alive forevermore as Savior and Lord, King and High Priest.

Moreover, they were willing to risk it all for their conviction. They realized that everything was on the line, and if they had believed a lie, then all was lost. They did not philosophize as do moderns as to whether it was worth it to follow Jesus anyway, regardless of whether he was only an extraordinary man or not, whether or not he really rose from the grave. The times and circumstances in which they lived did not permit them this modern luxury. Christianity was an illegal religion. And proponents of illegal religions were punished with death. As Paul declared, “. . . if Christ hath not been raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. Then they also that are fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If we have only hoped in Christ in this life, we are of all men most pitiable” (1 Cor. 15:16-19).

In that noble declaration Paul spoke for all Christians of every age, not just of his own. Truly, if we have only believed in empty promises, if we have only followed a deceiver and a charlatan, if we have only believed a lie — then we have only trusted in Jesus Christ in this life, and there is nothing for us beyond death and the grave, and we are “of all men most pitiable.” No doubt about it! If the world is right and we are wrong, then we have wasted our lives in the service of Jesus. We have lost everything. But, if we are right and the world is wrong, then the world has lost everything!

Howbeit, the Christian now is as the Christian then, convinced that we have not followed “cunningly devised fables” (2 Pet. 1:16), but persuasive and authentic testimony from eyewitnesses who were willing to risk life and limb to proclaim to the world that “The Lord is risen indeed . . .” (Luke 24:34). And if the Lord is risen, then our future is wrapped up with him, in glory! As the song-writer so fittingly said it, “Hallelujah, Christ arose!”   

P.O. Box 148335, Nashville, Tennessee 37214

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 6 p10 March 16, 2000