Living Godly in a Hellenistic Culture

By Daniel K. Williams

The test had come. Four godly young men, who were hundreds of miles away from their homeland, had to decide whether they would give in to the worldly culture around them or would remain faithful to the Lord. Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego made the right choice. At the risk of their lives, they refused to eat the king’s food, and instead served God in Babylon.

For the next 600 years, faithful men and women of God faced a similar choice. After Cyrus conquered Babylon, the Persians ruled Judea for over 200 years, and infused the Jewish people with near Eastern culture and language. In 330 B.C., the Greeks conquered the Persians, and the Jews became part of a Greek-speaking empire. For the next four centuries, God’s people struggled to remain holy in the midst of a Hellenistic culture. Some gave in to the temptations around them, while others kept themselves pure.

When Alexander the Great conquered the Persians in the late fourth century, Greek generals replaced the Persians as governors of Palestine. Centuries earlier, Daniel had predicted that Alexander’s successors would fight for control of his kingdom, and would involve the Jews in their struggle (Dan. 8, 11). In the twenty-two years following Alexander’s death, Greek armies passed through Palestine at least seven times.

Greek rule was not a completely negative experience for the Jews, though. After 301, the Ptolemies ruled Judea for a century, and the Jews benefitted from the new technology and economic impetus that these Greek-speaking kings of Egypt brought to Palestine. Artificial irrigation, a more efficient oil lamp, a new coinage standard, and a foot-powered potter’s wheel were only a few of the innovations that the Greeks gave the Jews. Under the Ptolemies, many Jews moved to Alexandria and other Greek-speaking cities, and they soon began to adopt Greek modes of thought. Nearly all of the Jews who moved abroad, and even many of those who remained in Palestine, learned to speak Greek. Some Greek-educated Alexandrian Jews wrote theological works that defended the Mosaic law using Platonic arguments.

A few Greeks who encountered the Jewish people were intrigued by their faith. One Ptolemaic king of the third century B.C. authorized a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. Known as the Septuagint, this translation remained the primary Bible of the Greek-speaking Jews and Christians for over five hundred years.

The peace of the early third century B.C. soon gave way to continued warfare between the Ptolemies and their rivals, the Greek Seleucids. Shortly after the Seleucids gained control of Palestine, Antiochus IV, a Seleucid monarch, attempted to hellenize the Jews by force. In 168 B.C., he converted the Jewish temple into a sanctuary of Zeus, and forced the Jews to abandon their religious rites. Many Jews were only too ready to comply. A few years before, the high priest Jason had already built a gymnasium in Jerusalem, where Jewish youths, who had tried to surgically reverse their circumcision in an effort to conform to Greek norms, competed naked in athletic events. As Daniel prophesied (Dan. 11:32), there were Jews who refused to tolerate these pagan practices. The Maccabeans led a revolt that drove the Greeks out of Jerusalem. They established their own Jewish Hasmonean dynasty, which soon became as corrupt as the pagan rulers had been. When the Romans conquered Judaea a century later, they deposed the Hasmoneans, and ruled the Jews themselves, first through the Herodian dynasty, and then through Roman governors. The Romans imposed their own military rule on Palestine, but they did not attempt to Latinize the Hellenic influence that had been present for centuries. The Jews, as well nearly everyone else in the eastern half of the Roman empire, continued to speak Greek. The Romans adopted many facets of Greek religion, art, architecture, and literature, so that the new Greco-Roman culture differed little from the Hellenistic culture that had previously pervaded the area. Faithful Jews, and subsequently Christians, continued to struggle against pagan influences as they tried to worship God in the midst of a Greek world.

There were many aspects of Hellenistic culture that all but the most ascetic Jews accepted. The Greek style of architecture dominated the Palestinian landscape. From the outside, a synagogue could be mistaken for a pagan temple, because the architectural styles were identical. Even Pharisaic Jews, who prided themselves on a strict observance of the law, read Greek literature. When Paul dealt with Gentiles, he quoted Greek poets (Acts 17:28; Tit. 1:12). Most Jews, except for some who lived in rural Palestine, spoke Greek. There were many educational, economic, and technological advantages to hellenization that were not sinful. As long as adaptation to Greek custom did not involve pagan practices, Paul said that he tried to fit into the culture around him for the sake of the gospel (1 Cor. 9:21).

Despite hellenization’s benign features, many sinful aspects of Greek culture caused problems for faithful Jews. The two greatest dangers lay in the area of religion and sexuality, as James suggested when he said that Gentile Christians needed to “abstain from the pollutions of idols and from fornication” (Acts 15:20).

The Greeks worshiped a pantheon of impotent, immoral, and competing deities. There were twelve gods and goddesses in the original pantheon, but each city honored its own patron deity above the others. Thus, Athens honored Athena as its patron goddess, while Ephesus worshiped Artemis (the Roman Diana). A number of intellectuals had already abandoned faith in these traditional gods by the first century A.D., but they continued to attend their city’s sacrifices out of a sense of civic duty. Everyone knew that temple sacrifices were not a display of faith, but a ritual obligation. People who wanted more from religion usually joined a mystery cult, where they could engage in a more fervent form of devotion that sometimes involved orgies, sexual immorality, or charismatic phenomena. Others turned to philosophy, which promised to offer atheistic, rational explanations for the questions of life. Athens was the philosophic center of the ancient world, and intellectuals throughout the Roman empire congregated in the city to enroll in one of the academies there. Both Plato and Aristotle founded schools in Athens, and other philosophers followed suit. Greek philosophers differed widely on a number of subjects, but nearly all of them continued to worship the traditional Greek gods, even though they doubted the veracity of Homeric myth. Although a few earlier Hellenistic rulers had tried to quell Judaism, the Romans of the early first century tolerated Jewish religion, because they considered it a local ancestral cult of Palestine that was analagous to the Ephesian devotion to Artemis. They could not, however, understand why a pagan who converted to Christianity would no longer be willing to worship the traditional gods, since they viewed such sacrifices as expressions of civic duty and loyalty to the authorities. The early Roman persecutions usually targeted Christians who refused to engage in public sacrifices.

Even those who truly believed in the traditional pantheon did not make worship the central aspect of their lives. Pagan religion treated devotion to the gods solely as a negotiation for beneficence, since they believed that humans could merit divine favors through service to the deities. They knew that humans could err, but they had no real concept of sin. The Greeks thought that a few sacrifices and offerings could usually make a person right with the gods. In contrast, the Lord’s people knew that humans could not offer anything to merit God’s favor; they could only be saved by accepting God’s grace (Acts 17:25; Rom. 6:23; Eph. 2:8).

The Greeks’ view of sex differed radically from God’s moral standards. Most Greek literary creations focused on illicit sexual relations, whether they were between gods or between humans. Greek and Latin authors were fascinated with sex in its many forms, including married love, adultery, premarital sex, rape, homosexuality, lesbianism, bestiality, necrophilia, pedophilia, prostitution, and narcissism. The Greeks did not practice all of these forms of sex on a regular basis, but they did write about them. The most common premarital sexual sins in the first-century Greek world were prostitution and homosexuality, while adultery and divorce were common marital problems. The Greeks expected women who did not become prostitutes to remain virgins until marriage, but they encouraged men to engage in homosexual acts, which they perhaps supplemented with visits to a heterosexual brothel, until they married, which was usually not until they were nearly thirty. Greeks considered it honorable for a male teacher to have sex with a male teenage student. After marriage, Greek males sometimes carried on homosexual relationships with young men, and there were a few who committed adultery, although this sin constituted legal grounds for divorce. Although women could sue for divorce, they had few other rights, since the Greeks thought that women were mentally and socially inferior to men. The apostles taught that Christians needed to reject the selfish view of sex that Greek males had, and to treat women and marriage as honorable in the sight of God (Rom. 1:24-27; 1 Cor. 6:9-20; Gal. 3:28; Heb. 13:4; 1 Pet. 3:7).

The Greeks also differed from Jews and Christians in their view of nudity and the body. Greek males wore no clothing when they competed in athletic games, and Greek artists usually portrayed their heroes and gods in the nude. Some male spectators expressed homosexual admiration for the naked bodies of the youths who competed in the athletic events. Sculptors rarely depicted females in the nude, but  they commonly portrayed women in tight garments that clearly revealed their voluptuousness.

Thus, Jews and Christians in the first-century Greco-Roman world faced the same challenge that Daniel and his three friends faced when they tried to live godly lives in a pagan society. There were certain customs of that society that they could adopt without violating their consciences, but they had to eschew sinful practices. The Jews used the architecture, money, literature, language, and technology of the Greeks without sinning, but the faithful had to refuse the idolatry, pagan philosophy, and sexual behavior of the Gentiles. Christians of the second and third centuries condemned all of the entertainment practices of the Greek world, including the music, theater performances, and athletic competitions of the day. They knew that in order to live godly, they had to reject the practices of the world. Most importantly, they knew that the Greeks, just as much as anyone else, needed a Savior. In Jesus Christ, both Greeks and Jews could be regenerated and become one church (1 Cor. 6:9-11; Gal. 3:26-29). At that moment, even Greeks could begin living as God’s people in the midst of a wicked world.

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 9 p12  May 4, 2000

Other Jewish Sects

By Steve Willis

From the Scriptures and from history we learn of many Jewish sects that would have been present in New Testament times. The Pharisees and Sadducees are covered elsewhere in this issue. A few others are: the Hellenes (see Acts 6), the Diaspora (Acts 18:1-2), the various “messianic” movements (Acts 5:36; 21:38ff; Matt. 24:24), and the “half-Jewish” Samaritans (John 4). For some of these groups, some information comes from the Scriptures while for others, information comes from historical records, such as accounts from Flavius Josephus (A.D. 37 to circa 101), a Pharisee of Galilee, and Philo of Alexandria, Egypt (circa 20 B.C. to A.D. 50). Since the 1950s, an attempt has been made to associate the Dead Sea Scrolls with a variety of these sects, particularly the Essenes. In this article we will cover three more: the Essenes, the Herodians and the Zealots. 

The Essenes

Today the major working hypothesis is that the Essenes lived in the wilderness near the Dead Sea and produced the scrolls found in several caves there. However, all do not accept that view, proffering instead that the scrolls are collections of a variety of Jewish writings that were taken out of Jerusalem and hidden before the Temple fell. Norman Golb makes the case that if the scrolls had been found in a reverse order, that no one would have developed the Essene-Qumran Sect Hypothesis (see Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls?). For this reason, I will cover what was known of the Essenes from earlier writings then note what may be drawn from the Dead Sea Scrolls separately.

The earliest reference in history to the Essene sect was made by Josephus. He wrote that, at the time of one the Maccabees, specifically Jonathan (died 142? B.C.), there were three sects of the Jews, one being the Essenes. However, the name “Essene” was not mentioned in either book of the Maccabees. It may well be that in that time they were called “Hasidaeans” (from Heb. hasidim, pious ones), identified as “valiant Israelites, all of them devout followers of the law” (1 Maccabees 2:42). The Hasidaeans later deserted the Maccabees when an alliance was made with Rome. It appears that the Essenes lived separately from the other sects of Judaism. Several meanings for “Essenes” have been offered based on or related to a variety of Hebrew or Aramaic words: ones who were “pious,” or had “holiness” (as per Philo), “healers,” “do” (i.e., doers of the Law), or “trust.” Josephus offered yet another word which was identified with the priest’s breastplate, therefore signifying “oracles” or prophets for God. 

Of the Essenes, Merrill Tenney wrote, “The absence from the New Testament of any direct allusion to these people may mean that they had little influence on the main current of Jewish life” (New Testament Times, 102). Still, they may have been present at some of the teachings and miracles of Jesus or the apostles. J.E.H. Thomson wrote, “. . . they may appear in the Gospels under another name. There is a class of persons three times referred to — those ‘that waited for the consolation of Israel’ (Lk 2 45 AV), ‘looking for the redemption’ (2 38), ‘waited for the kingdom of God’ (Mk 15 43 AV; Lk 23 51 AV)” (“The Essenes” in International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia 1005). It is hard to say how many Essenes there were. Hippolytus (circa 170 to c. 235) wrote that besides the Pharisees and Sadducees, the “rest are Essenes” (Refutation of All Heresies). That could be a large number. Eusebius, said to be quoting from Philo, numbers the Essenes in the 10,000s. Present versions of Philo and Josephus both number the Essenes at 4,000. In one passage, Philo wrote: “They dwell in many cities of Judea, and in many villages, and in great populous communities” (Hypothetica 11ff). Yet in another text, he wrote that they avoided the lawless cities preferring only to live in villages (Quod Omnis Probus Liber). Josephus recorded that they lived and traveled among cities. Pliny wrote that they lived near the Dead Sea — thus making them the prime  candidates for writing the Dead Sea Scrolls.  

The Essenes lived in communes. Philo wrote that the Essenes “. . . have every thing in common, their expenses, their garments, their food. When they work for wages they do not retain these for themselves, but bring it into the common stock” (Quod Omnis Probus Liber). They would share all things and work for the commune. Each one would not even own two cloaks or two pairs of shoes. The Essene commune was led by “overseers” (Gr. epimeletai), a president, and priests. When traveling from one community to another, they would seek out the Essenes in the new town and stay with them. Apparently some renounced (“despised” acc. to Josephus) marriage, being suspicious that women were harmful to one’s spiritual standing. Others would be given in marriage, but only to procreate children. Since there were few children, most new converts often would come from without. It took a candidate two to three years of study and devotion as well as “baptisms” or ritual washings before he was fully admitted to the community. As a teen, Josephus, himself, entered into such study, but apparently not for long. Once admitted, the individual was to keep Essene doctrines secret.  

For the Essenes, each day would begin at sunrise with prayers and ritual washings in cold water. Then, while dressed in white linen, they would eat breakfast together in silence. A priest would pray before and after the meal, as in Jewish custom. The meal was followed by hymns. They were dismissed to their various jobs until later in the day, near sunset, when they would again do washings, put on white clothing and enter together to eat. One who committed heinous sins was excommunicated — a sentence viewed by some as amounting to a death sentence. One so expelled might even starve himself to death.

The Essenes carefully observed the Sabbath and met in synagogues. They were taught to do what is right and avoid what is wrong, using a three-fold criterion: Love of God, Love of Virtue, and Love of Man. Guided by these principles, they carefully studied Scriptures. They did not keep slaves. They did not lay up treasures of gold or silver for themselves. They avoided oaths and falsehoods. They took care of the sick and the elderly. Josephus told of at least two Essenes who were considered “prophets” and recorded that were called to predict or interpret dreams for kings. There was a Gate of the Essenes in Jerusalem so it appears that the Essenes went to the Temple on occasions, but would avoid animal sacrifices.

No Essene hope of a coming messiah was recorded by ancient writings. However, writings by Philo and Josephus were presented before Grecian and Roman readers. These authors may have played down such hope to allay fears that a coming one would overthrow existing governments. According to Hippolytus, the Essenes believed in the resurrection of both body and spirit. They also affirmed that there would be “both a judgment and conflagration of the universe, and that the wicked will be eternally punished” (Refutation XXII). 

Hippolytus wrote that four divisions developed among the Essenes. One group would not handle coins nor enter city gates with images. Another division would carefully watch a Gentile who had been taught to see if he would undergo circumcision. If he did not, these Essenes would threaten to slay him. “. . . an Essene spares not, but even slaughters” (Refutation XXI). Hippolytus identified this second group by two names: the Zealots and the Sicarii. A third party would call no one “lord” except God, even if put to torture or death. The fourth group were those who left the Essene discipline. A “faithful” Essene would avoid those deserters, and should he come in contact with one, he would have be cleansed by washings.

According to Josephus, the Essenes had secret books including some with the name of many angels. He wrote that they were bound by an oath to preserve these books (Wars II. viii.7). Before the finding of the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS), scholars presumed these books to be some of the already known, non-canonical, pseudepigraphic books, such as 4 Esdras. Since 1947 numerous scrolls and fragments have been found in many caves near the Dead Sea, which many started associating with the Essenes. That may well be, but not all are satisfied with this hypothesis. The DSS seem to span time between 200 B.C. and A.D. 70. According to the non-Essene hypothesis, these scrolls may represent several Jewish sects. One text indicates that many treasures and writings were removed from Jerusalem and hidden in the wilderness to protect them from the Romans who destroyed Jerusalem. Some may well describe the Essenes, though again, they are not mentioned by that name. Even if not, they add background to the study of New Testament times.

The DSS include most of the Old Testament Scriptures, commentaries on some of those books, lists, hymns and other important books of the sect that lived near the Dead Sea. The Damascus Document describes a group that took itself away from the corrupted worship in Jerusalem (similar to the Zadokite Fragments found in 1896). The Manual of Discipline and A Sectarian Manifesto (MMT) set down rules for a community. A conflict between a Teacher of Righteousness and a Wicked Priest is detailed — both not identified by names. The War Scroll told of the battle between the Sons of Light and the Sons of Darkness. Portions of calendar texts found seem to show that they thought the timing of worship at Jerusalem was corrupt. Messianic hopes may have been expressed in some of the Thanksgiving Psalms — though a century too early for Jesus. A Vision of the Son of God described a coming messiah: “He will be called Son of God, they will call him the son of the Most High.” Another tells of a “pierced” messiah (or one that pierces, depending on the translation). These are concepts unknown in Jewish writings — outside the Bible — until the finding of the DSS. The “Copper Scroll” listed scrolls and treasures hidden. At least some of the DSS reflect modified-Sadducean views, certainly anti-Pharisaic views. Other passages agree with the hope of resurrection held by the Pharisees. Much more study and probably more finds must happen to clarify better the relation, if any, between the Essenes and the Dead Sea Scrolls. 

The Herodians

From 67 to circa 61 B.C., the Roman general Pompey fought wars against Syria and marched into Jerusalem. Judea came under Roman rule. In 47 B.C., Herod the Great became the Roman procurator over Judea. By 39 B.C., he was proclaimed King of the Jews — though he was not actually a Jew, but an Idumean. Herod the Great became known as a “friend of Caesar” (cf. John 19:12, said in challenge to Pilate). The earlier Maccabean revolt tried to put Judea under a priest-king. The Jews were disappointed with lowliness of Roman rulers and that under Rome they no longer had a priest-king. So, according to Michael Grant, “some of them took a second and more favorable look at the vanished monarchy, and formed a nostalgic party aiming at restoration of Herod’s house” (The Jews in the Roman World 87). This group became known as the Herodians. Perhaps, like the present-day FOBs (Friends of Bill [Clinton]), the Herodians were friends of Herod and his family dynasty. Being a political party, the Herodians may have included people of the several Jewish sects, but they were also more Hellenized (i.e., like the Greeks) than other Judeans. Jesus warned against the leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod (Mark 8:15). The Herodians are mentioned by name in the New Testament. Jesus and John challenged the life and status of the “King of the Jews” and his family (Matt. 14:1-6; Luke 13:31-32). In Mark 3:6 and 12:13 (|| Matthew 22:16), the Herodians along with the Pharisees tried to destroy Jesus. On the latter occasion, they tried to trap him with whether he would advise paying the poll-tax to Caesar. 

The Zealots

The “Zealots” (enthusiasts) were a Jewish political party which despised the political compromises of their leaders. As noted above, Hippolytus thought the Zealots were a division of the Essenes. According to Josephus, the Zealots originated in A.D. 6, during the reigns of Herod the Great and Quirinius. Judas the Galilean was the original leader of this group. The Zealots resisted Rome and its appointees (such as the Herods) in any attempt to rule Judea. Like patriots today, the Zealots strongly supported Israel’s right to exist in Canaan under its own government. It appears that “Canaanean” was a synonym to “Zealot.” One of Jesus’ disciples, Simon, was called a Zealot and Canaanean (Matt. 10:4; Luke 6:15). Some extremists among the Zealots were known as Sicarii (dagger men). Josephus indicated that Zealots started the uprising against Rome in A.D. 66, which led to the destruction of Jerusalem and its Temple. 

Conclusion

We must realize that these Jewish sects were composed of people in a time of religious division and political unrest. These were people who also needed God’s Savior. It seems likely that some from the many Jewish sects, though unknown now by name, must have lowered their politics and religious views to lift their eyes to Jesus, who could unite them in the gospel message of truth and love. May we do the same.

18 Rossmere Ct. SE, Medicine Hat, Alberta Canada T1B 2M3

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 9 p5  May 4, 2000

The Sadducees

By Jerry Fite

In 168 B.C., conflict over the Grecian influence in the lives of the Jewish people came to a head. In December of that year Antiochus IV (Epiphanes), the Grecian ruler in Syria, plundered the Temple in Jerusalem; sacrilegiously offered swine upon the altar that he had built over God’s altar; and commanded circumcision to stop immediately. This forced intrusion kindled the religious fires of such men as Mattathias and his son, Judas. The Maccabean revolt began, and the Hasmonean line of leaders became prominent in Judea for about 104 years. During the Maccabean period (167-63 B.C.), names of the various sects among the Jews surfaced. Josephus records that one of these sects was the Sadducees (Antiquities XIII.v.9).

The origin of the word, “Sadducee” is uncertain. Some trace the word to the Hebrew verb tsaddaq which means, “to be righteous.” They see this fitting the Sadducees, for this sect believed they should only be governed by the written law of Moses, not the oral law or traditions of the Fathers. Others connect the word to the proper name “Zadok.” This name is found in the Bible referring to the High Priest in David and Solomon’s kingdom (2 Sam. 8:17; 1 Kings 1:32). Ezekiel exalts the “sons of Zadok” as the ones who “come near to Jehovah to minister unto Him” (Ezek. 40:46). Ezra, one of the sons of Zadok, returns to Jerusalem following the Babylonian Captivity to serve God as Priest, diligently teaching the people God’s law (Ezra 7:1-2, 10). Some therefore see the word “Sadducees” originating from the word “Zadok,” not due to spelling similarities, but due to the stronghold the Sadducees had on the High Priesthood during the inter-testamental period. 

The Sadducees had their nucleus in the Jewish aristocracy. Josephus writes they “were able to persuade none but the rich, and have not the populace obsequious to them, but the Pharisees have the multitude of their side” (Antiquities XIII.x.6). They were determined to keep their dominance in the office of the high priest. Their problem with Herod the Great in (47-37 B.C.) was not over his being pro-Roman as much as he was Idumean. They hated him, as they had hated his father Antipater, for they saw the Idumeans encroaching on the Hasmonean royal house. Herod the Great, on becoming ruler, arrested and executed forty-five of “the principal men of Antiochus’s party” — the Sadducees (Ibid. XV.i.2). He filled the vacant seats in the Sanhedrin, but limited the Counsel’s jurisdiction to doctrinal law. 

The appointments to the presidency of the Counsel would now be vested in himself. He would eventually marry into the Hasmonean line and appoint his new father-in-law as high priest. This action not only allowed him to satisfy his desires for beautiful women, but it also helped to legitimize his  standing among the aristocracy (Ibid. XV.ix.3). Herod was crafty for he initially appointed those of the old high-priestly family as high priest. However, his intrusion through marriage into the power base of the Sadducees changed the aristocracy. While initially keeping the aristocracy of birth in place, more important to him, he was building an aristocracy of Sadducees characterized by loyalty and service to him as king. 

As we open the pages of the New Testament, we observe this type of aristocracy in place. The close connection between the Sadducees and the Herods is seen in comparing Jesus’ statement in Matthew with Mark’s. Jesus warns, “take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees” (Matt. 16:6). Mark records Jesus as saying, “take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herod” (Mark 8:15). The high priest is connected with the sect of the Sadducees rising up and putting the apostles in public ward (Acts 5:17). The aristocracy of “the priests, the captain of the temple and the Sadducees” manifested their authority over doctrinal matters when they imprisoned the apostles for preaching the resurrection of Christ with its implications (Acts 4:1-2). They had constant political concerns. For example, the “chief priests” along with the Pharisees were concerned over the stir Jesus was causing with his miracles. They feared the people would believe on him, and “the Romans would come and take away both us and our nation” (John 11:47-48). 

Along with the Pharisees, the Sadducees’ desire to keep their political prominence may have been one of the factors blinding them to their spiritual needs. John warns these sects about the true meaning of repentance connected with his baptism (Matt. 3:7-9). Bringing forth “fruit worthy of repentance” was the need of these “offspring of vipers.” Physical identification with Abraham was not enough. Apparently, they came out of curiosity over why so many were going into the wilderness unto John. They wanted to keep their finger on the pulse of the people, not truly change their own hearts and lives toward God. They asked Jesus, “show them a sign from heaven.” Their motive was to “try” him, not accept the spiritual truth these signs confirmed (Matt. 16:1). They would acknowledge a “notable miracle” among Jesus’ apostles. But instead of believing the Christ whom the apostles preached, they threatened them in order that “it spread no further among the people” (Acts 4:6, 16, 17). 

Josephus describes the Sadducees as one of “three philosophical sects among the Jews” (Wars II.viii.2). According to Josephus, the Sadducees rejected the “oral traditions” or “traditions of the fore-fathers” which the Pharisees added to the written Law of Moses (Antiquities XIII.x.6; XIII.xvi.2). They believed that the “souls died with their bodies,” rejecting the idea of a resurrection, and the punishments and rewards of an afterlife (Ibid. XVIII.i.3). They rejected the concept of God’s providence or fate ruling in people’s lives. “But the Sadducees are those who compose the second order, and take away fate entirely, and suppose that God is not concerned in our doing or not doing what is evil . . . ” (Wars II.viii.14). 

The New Testament confirms some of these disbeliefs that characterized the Sadducees’ philosophy. In reminding the assembly that the reason for him standing before them was his belief in the hope of the resurrection, Paul caused dissension among the Sadducees and Pharisees, dividing the assembly. Why? “For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit but the Pharisees confess both” (Acts 23:8). They were known as a group who professed, “there is no resurrection” (Matt. 22:23; Mark 12:18; Luke 20:27). They did not believe in spirit-beings called angels, nor man having a separate “spirit” distinguishable from the “breath” that animates the body. 

The Sadducees came to a place of prominence in Jewish history in the last half of the second century before Christ They were known only in Jewish and Christian circles for a little over two hundred years. They gloried in the “written” Law of Moses, but were silenced by the Lord when he told them they “err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God” (Matt. 23:29). The very Scripture they acknowledged and in which they gloried (Exod. 3:6), was the basis for Jesus logically showing that there must be the resurrection from the dead, which they denied. Having no hope for life after death, the Sadducees lived for this world only, coveting its materialistic trappings. Then, they lost the only thing that was important for them to retain — their place of prominence in this world among the dignitaries. By rejecting the Messiah, Jesus the Christ, their prominence ended, never again to arise (cf. Matt. 23:37-24:2; John 11:48). The Sadducees, and their history are indeed as I learned as a child: “sad-u-cee.”

4018 Danpree, Pasadena, Texas 77504

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 9 p3  May 4, 2000

The Temple

By Daniel H. King, Sr.

Throughout the history of Israel, the temple represented the place where Heaven and earth came together for the purpose of sacred worship. Like the ark before it, the temple was intended to be a symbol of God’s presence in the midst of his people (Exod. 25:21-22). Its location was, therefore, the most sacred place on earth. The O.T. word for temple, hekal, meant “palace” or “great house.” The Sumerian word from whence it derived could be used of the dwelling place of a king or of a god. More often used in the O.T., however, were the terms beth Yahweh or beth Elohim, which simply signified the “house” of God, his place of earthly dwelling. In the N.T. two terms are found. First there is hieron, signifying a “temple area,” and naos, which described the “sanctuary” itself.

Three Temples

The Bible records in its history the stories of three successive Temples. Solomon built the first Temple (ca. 957 B.C.) after David had planned it and spent years accumulating wealth to adorn it (2 Sam. 7:3-16). David had acquired the Temple hill as a place of sacrifice from Araunah the Jebusite at an earlier period at the insistence of the prophet Gad (2 Sam. 24:18-25). The book of Chronicles identifies this hill with Mount Moriah, where Abraham offered his son Isaac (2 Chron. 3:1; Gen. 22:1ff.). So the place itself was considered sacred on account of these earlier events. 

The second period of Temple construction was initiated by the decree of Cyrus in 538 B.C. This proclamation made it possible for the Jews to return to their homeland from Babylonia. Persian financial aid was also offered to make the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem a reality. Sheshbazzar, the governor, laid the original foundation, but it was left to Zerubbabel the new governor in 520 B.C. to complete the work. Jeshua the high priest supplied support for the work, as did the prophets Haggai and Zechariah (Ezra 5:1-2). The size of this Temple was approximately that of Solomon, except that some aspects appear to have been influenced by the Temple Vision of Ezekiel (Ezek. 40-42). This Temple was later profaned by Antiochus in December, 167 B.C., and subsequently rededicated by Judas Maccabeus in 164 B.C.. Still later, it was captured by the Roman general Pompey in 63 B.C. Pompey, however, neither profaned nor plundered it.

The third and final epoch of Temple building is roughly equivalent to the period of the N.T. itself. Herod the Great came to power in 37 B.C. Hoping to capture the hearts of his Jewish subjects and the imagination of all the Roman Empire, Herod set about making the Jerusalem Temple one of the architectural achievements of the age. Since the Jews were afraid that the work would interrupt the temple service, Herod went to great lengths to prevent this, rebuilding the old structure piecemeal, never stopping the worship. Since only priests could enter the Temple and the inner court, one thousand of them were the masons and carpenters for that inner area. 

Herod’s workers began their work in 20 B.C., and although the king died in 4 B.C., they continued their labors until the rebellion in A.D. 64. Actually, the house itself was completed in a year and a half; eight years were spent on the surrounding buildings and the court areas took many decades. The Jews said to Jesus that the Temple had been under construction for forty-six years (John 2:20); more than thirty more years were to pass before the work was completed. Unfortunately, this great monument was destroyed just six years later in A.D. 70.

The Temple During N.T. Times

The most notable contribution of Herod the Great was the magnificent stonework of the Temple platform which was greatly enlarged by his workmen, to roughly twice its former dimensions. As enlarged by Herod, the Temple area occupied an elongated square of from 925 to 950 feet and upwards. Both at the southeastern and the southwestern angles of the once proud structure, excavators have found stones measuring from 20 to 40 feet in length, and weighing above 100 tons! The description which is found in the writings of Josephus (Antiquities XV.11; Wars of the Jews V.5) and the tractate Middoth of the Mishnah (written ca. A.D. 150) have thus been further fleshed out by the discoveries of recent archaeological efforts.

Herod is said to have surrounded the whole Temple enclosure with magnificent porches, particularly the royal stoa along the southern wall. Through the Huldah gates, double and triple arches of which may still be seen, worshipers went up through enclosed passageways into the court of the Gentiles. Greek inscriptions separating this court from the court of the women and the holier inner courts of Israel (men) and the priests have been found. The steps south of the Temple, where Jesus is thought to have taught on several occasions, have been excavated and reconstructed. An inscription which reads, “To the place of trumpeting,” was found below the southwest corner where there was a monumental staircase ascending into the Temple from the main street below. Perhaps this was the “Pinnacle of the Temple” from which Satan tempted Jesus to throw himself down.

The Fortress Antonia

Near the northwest corner of the Temple area was located the fortress Antonia. This structure was built or rebuilt in Hasmonean times upon a rock 50 cubits high covered with smooth stonework to make it more difficult to climb. Herod strengthened it and gave it the new name it had in N.T. times in honor of Antony. Protected by a wall 3 cubits high, the tower itself was 40 cubits high. At each corner of the tower was a turret. Three of these were 50 cubits high, but the one on the southeast corner was 70 cubits high. Stairways led up from the porticoes of the Temple to the tower. This defensive structure dominated the Temple, and was the headquarters of the Roman garrison so often needed to keep the peace. From the stairs which led from the Temple precincts to Antonia, Paul delivered his sermon after having been rescued by the guard from the riotous mob (Acts 21:31-22:21). The priestly vestments were kept in this building.

The Royal Bridge

By far the most magnificent avenue into the complex was that at the southwestern angle of the Temple. A colossal bridge on arches spanned the intervening Valley of the Tyropoeon, connecting the ancient City of David with what is called the “Royal Porch of the Temple.” Each arch of this bridge spanned 41.5 feet, and the spring-stones measured 24 feet in length by 6 inch thickness. It is difficult to exaggerate the splendor of this approach to the sanctuary. Here the city would have lain spread before us like a map. Over the parapet of the bridge we might have looked into the Tyropoeon Valley below, a depth of not less than 225 feet. The roadway which spanned this cleft for a distance of 354 feet, from Mt. Moriah to Mt. Zion opposite, was about 50 feet wide. And, it was over this bridge that the Jewish leadership led the Savior, in the sight of all Jerusalem, when they shuffled him to and from the palace of the high-priest, that of Herod, the  meeting-place of the Sanhedrin, and the judgment-seat of Pilate.

The Temple Porches

The Royal Bridge led into the Royal Tem- ple Porch. This Porch (portico, Greek stoa, an area with a roof supported by columns) consisted of a treble colonnade, formed of 162 pillars, ranged in four rows of 40 pillars each, the two odd pillars serving as a kind of screen, where the Porch opened upon the bridge. It consisted of a central nave 45 feet wide, with gigantic pillars 100 feet high, and of two aisles 30 feet wide, with pillars 50  feet high. This was only one of the porches which formed the southern enclosure of the first and outermost court of the Temple, that of the Gentiles. The view from the top of this colonnade into Kidron was to the stupendous depth of 450 feet. This and the other porticos, or cloisters, were among the finest architectural features of the Temple. They ran all around the inside of its wall, and bounded the outer enclosure of the Court of the Gentiles. They consisted of double rows of Corinthian pillars, all monoliths, wholly cut out of one block of marble, each pillar being 37.5 feet high. A flat roof, richly ornamented, rested against the wall, in which also the outer row of pillars was inserted. Possibly there may have been towers where one colonnade joined the other.

These halls or  porches around the Court of the Gentiles must have been very convenient places for friendly or religious meetings and discussions. Here Jesus was found by his parents, disputing with the doctors; here in later years he would often teach the people; and here the first assemblies of the Jerusalem church when they were “continuing daily with one accord in the Temple . . .” (Acts 2:46). In Solomon’s Porch, which ran along the eastern wall of the Temple, Jesus walked during the Feast of Dedication (John 10:23), when he so boldly declared, “I and my Father are one.” All the people ran together to this location after a “notable miracle” was performed upon a lame man (Acts 3:11), since this was the place where the Christians assembled on a regular basis (Acts 5:12).

The Court of the Gentiles

When one entered the Temple, it was the rule to pass in by the right side, and when leaving it to go out by the left hand. The first great expanse as one came into the structure itself was the great Court of the Gentiles. It formed the lowest or outer enclosure of the Sanctuary. The area was paved with the finest variegated marble. Its name was derived from the fact that it was open to all, both Jews and Gentiles, provided they observed the rules of decorum and reverence. In this court tradition places the apartments for the Levites, and a synagogue. In addition, a market was located there for the sale of oxen, sheep, and doves to be sacrificed. Here also were the tables of the money-changers (Matt. 21:12; John 2:14). 

Within a short distance, in the court, a beautifully ornamented marble screen stood 4.5 feet high, bearing Greek and Latin inscriptions warning Gentiles not to proceed further, on pain of death. Because the Jews thought Paul infringed this order, the infuriated multitude “went about to kill him” (Acts 21:31). Beyond this enclosure a flight of 14 steps, each 9 inches high, led up to a terrace 15 feet wide, which bounded the inner wall of the Temple.

The Gates of the Temple

On both the north and south sides of the Temple terrace, flights of steps led up to three gates which opened into the Court of the Priests, while a fourth gate led into the Court of the Women. Thus there were nine gates opening from the terrace into the Sanctuary, the principal one from the east, and four north and south, of which one on the north and south, led into the Court of the Women. The other three on both north and south led into the Court of the Priests. These eight side gates were all two-leaved, wide, high, with superstructures and chambers supported by two pillars, and covered with gold and silver plating.

More magnificent than all of these, however, was the ninth or eastern gate, which formed the principal entrance into the Temple. The ascent to it was from the terrace by fifteen easy steps. On these steps the Levites were wont on the Feast of Tabernacles to sing the fifteen ‘Psalms of Degrees,’ or ascent (Pss. 120-134). The gate itself was made of dazzling Corinthian brass, richly ornamented, and so massive were its double doors that it needed the united strength of twenty men to open and close them. This was the ‘Beautiful Gate’ of the Temple. It is twice mentioned in the N.T. (Acts 3:2, 10). From the fact that it was composed entirely of Corinthian brass, and had been the gift of a certain Nicanor of Alexandria, Josephus tells us it was known as “the Corinthian gate,” and the Mishnah informs us that it was also called the “gate of Nicanor.” It was before this gate that everything that was ordered to be done “before the Lord” took place. There the cleansed leper and the women coming for purification presented themselves to the priests, and there also the “water of jealousy” was given to the suspected wife.

The Court of the Women

This was most likely the place of common worship for most Jews. Since women were not allowed to proceed any further into the Temple complex, females occupied raised galleries along three sides of this court. The space itself covered an area around 200 feet square. All around it ran a simple colonnade, and within it, against the wall, the 13 chests, or “trumpets,” for charitable contributions were placed. These chests were narrow at the mouth and wide at the bottom, so that they were shaped like trumpets. Nine were marked for legally required gifts, the others were for strictly voluntary contributions. Trumpets 1 and 2 were for the Temple half-shekel; Trumpet 3 was for purchase of turtle doves for sacrificing (cf. Luke 2:22, 24); Trumpet 4 similarly received the value of the offerings of young pigeons; Trumpet 5 was for wood used in the sacrifices; Trumpet 6 for incense; Trumpet 7 for golden vessels; Trumpet 8 for sin offerings; Trumpets 9-13 for any left over after purchase of trespass-offerings, offerings of birds, the offering of the Nazirite, of the cleansed leper, and other voluntary offerings. This was the treasury where Jesus taught during the Feast of Tabernacles (John 7-8). He also taught several lessons which pertained to this place and the practices which were familiar there (cf. Matt. 6:2; Mark 12:41; Luke 21:1).

The Court of Israel

This large double court, divided as it was by a low balustrade 1.5 feet high, measured about 280.5 feet in length by 202.5 feet in breadth. Of this only a narrow strip, 16.5 feet in width and extending the entire breadth of the court from north to south, formed the Court of Israel. Two steps led up from it to the Court of the Priests. In that court, three low semicircular steps brought one up to a sort of pulpit or platform, where the Levites often sang and played during the ordinary Temple service. On the northern side of the Court of the Priests were three gates, that of Nitzutz, Sacrifices, and Beth-Moked. But the most prominent object in this Court was the immense altar of unhewn stones, 15 feet high, and 48 feet square. An inclined plane, 48 feet long by 24 wide, led up to the altar. Beside it was a great heap of salt wherewith every sacrifice was to be salted, and upon it burned three separate fires. One was for the sacrifices, another for incense, and the third to supply the means for kindling the other two. An immense Molten Sea or Great Laver for the priests ablutions, stood between the altar and the porch of the Temple, supported by twelve colossal lions. It was filled every morning and drained every evening by machinery which brought it from tunnels in the Temple mount. They ultimately derived the water supply from the hills about Hebron, from Etham, and from the three pools of Solomon. The total length of this aqueduct (called the “low-level” aqueduct) was over 40 miles in length. Archaeologists have estimated that the total number of gallons which could have been stored for Temple use in the storage cisterns which they have discovered approach some 10 million gallons!

The Holy House

The Temple itself was built upon immense foundations of solid blocks of white marble covered with gold, each block measuring, according to Josephus, 67.5 by 9 feet. Mounting by a flight of 12 steps up to the Porch, the Holy Place and the Most Holy were contained within a building which was 90 by 120 feet. A gabled cedar roof, with protruding golden spikes, and surrounded by an elegant balustrade, covered the entirety.

Five Things Lacking

The Babylonian Talmud (Yoma 21b) presents a list of five things that were present in the Temple of Solomon which were lacking in the Herodian sanctuary. They are: the ark and its equipment, the sacred fire, the Shekinah, the Holy Spirit, and Urim and Thummim. The whole point of the passage is to point out the relative inferiority of Herod’s Temple, despite its physical grandeur, to that of Solomon.

Jesus Pronounces a Curse Upon the Holy Temple

In Matthew 24:1, 2 Jesus foretold the end of the magnificent Jewish sanctuary, noting that “not one stone shall be left upon another which shall not be thrown down.” The Lord’s prediction was fulfilled with chilling accuracy in the year A.D. 70, within one full generation of Jesus’ pronouncement. The Arch of Titus in Rome, upon which are sculptured some of the sacred objects taken from the Temple, is interesting in this regard. It pictures the golden lampstand, the golden table of the bread of the Presence with incense cups, two silver trumpets, and other objects being carried in the triumphal procession in honor of Titus, Jerusalem’s conqueror. These were the final vestiges of the sacred worship of Israel’s Temple. It has never again been rebuilt.

P.O. Box 148335, Nashville, Tennessee 37214-8335 danielhking@email.msn.com

Truth Magazine Vol. XLIV: 9 p8  May 4, 2000